From Cradle to Plate: Analysing the Life Cycle Sustainability of Fish Feed Composition
By: Beate Zlaugotne and Jelena Pubule
References
- International Feed Industry Federation. Annual Report 2022–2023. 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://annualreport.ifif.org/wp-content/uploads/IFIF-Annual-Report-2022-2023-15-03-24.pdf
- European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Feed and food 2023. 2024. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/FF_2023.pdf
- European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Feed Sustainability Charter 2030. 2020. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/home/fefac-feed-sustainability-charter-2030/
- European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Circular Feed – Optimised Nutrient Recovery Through Animal Nutrition. 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 15.07.2024]. https://fefac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/FEFAC-Circular-Feed-Publication-13-June-2022.pdf
- Good practices for the feed sector. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Feed Industry Federation, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1761en
- European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed. Official Journal of the European Union 2018 L 229/1
- European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Official Journal of the European Union 2021 L 268/29
- European Feed Manufacturers Federation. PEFCR Feed for Food-Producing Animals. 2018.
- Roques S., Deborde C., Richard N., Skiba-Cassy S., Moing A., Fauconneau B. Metabolomics and fish nutrition: a review in the context of sustainable feed development. Reviews in Aquaculture 2020:12(1):261–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12316
- European Feed Manufacturers Federation. Advanced feeding strategies for enhanced and circular sustainable livestock and aquaculture production. How do they work? 2023.
- ISO. ISO 14040 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. 2006.
- ISO. ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. 2006.
- Roy S. M., Machavaram R., Moulick S., Mukherjee C. K. Economic feasibility study of aerators in aquaculture using life cycle costing (LCC) approach. Journal of Environmental Manage 2022:302:114037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114037
- United Nations Environment Programme. Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). 2021.
- Craig S., Kuhn D. Understanding fish nutrition, feeds and feeding. 2017.
- Aragão C., Gonçalves A. T., Costas B., Azeredo R., Xavier M. J., Engrola S. Alternative Proteins for Fish Diets: Implications beyond Growth. Animals 2022:12(9):1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091211
- Nasopoulou C., Zabetakis I. Benefits of fish oil replacement by plant originated oils in compounded fish feeds. A review. LWT 2012:47(2):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.01.018
- Kamalam B. S., Medale F., Panserat S. Utilisation of dietary carbohydrates in farmed fishes: New insights on influencing factors, biological limitations and future strategies. Aquaculture 2017:467:3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.007
- Lerfall J., Bendiksen E. Å., Olsen J. V., Morrice D., Østerlie M. A comparative study of organic versus conventional farmed Atlantic salmon. I. Pigment and lipid content and composition, and carotenoid stability in ice-stored fillets. Aquaculture 2016:451:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.09.013
- Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F. A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Protein Alternatives for Use in Fish Feed – Life Cycle Assessment of Black Soldier Fly, Yellow Mealworm and Soybean Protein. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):581–592. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0043
- Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Life cycle assessment of fish feed for oil alternatives-environmental impact of microalgae, rapeseed and fish oil. Agronomy Research 2023:21(3):1351–1360. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.074
- Zlaugotne B., Diaz Sanchez F. A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Microalgae and Synthetic Astaxanthin Pigments. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0018
- Xiarchos I., Morozinis A. K., Charitidis C. Life cycle assessment and possible impacts of CFRPs for space applications. MATEC Web of Conferences 2019:304:07006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930407006
- UNEP. Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 11.07.2024]. Available: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Methodological-Sheets_2021_final.pdf
- Chakraborty S. TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal 2022:2:100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021
- García-Cascales M. S., Lamata M. T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math Computer Model 2012:56(5):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022
Language: English
Page range: 686 - 694
Submitted on: May 14, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2024
Published on: Nov 13, 2024
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Beate Zlaugotne, Jelena Pubule, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.