Analytical Hierarchy Method for Evaluating the Environmental Sustainability in the Context of Ecosystem Services Enhancing: A Case Study of the Biosphere Reserve, Ukraine
References
- Brown T., Веrgstrom J., Loomis J. Defining, valuing, and providing ecosystem goods and services. Natural Resources Journal 2007:47(2):329–376.
- Fagioli F. F., Paolotti L., Boggia A. Trends in Environmental Management Systems Research. A Content Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0005
- Costanza R., et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 2014:26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
- Siksnane I., Lagzdins A. The Effects of Meteorological and Hydrological Conditions on Nutrient Losses from Agricultural Areas in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):512–523. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0039
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment [Online]. [Accessed: 30.01.2023]. Available: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.301.aspx.pdf
- Harrington R., et al. Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary. Biodiversity and Conservation 2010:19(10):2773–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9834-9
- Haslett J. R., et al. Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework for integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiversity and Conservation 2010:19(10):2963–2977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9743-y
- Oguh C. E., et al. Ecosystem and Ecological Services; Need for Biodiversity Conservation-A Critical Review. Asian Journal of Biology 2021:11(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajob/2021/v11i430146
- Mace G. M., Norris K., Fitter A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2012:27(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
- Bohvalovs G., et al. Bioeconomy Sustainability Index: A Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0095
- Bennett E. M., Peterson G. D., Gordon L. J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 2009:12(12):1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
- Ewel J. J. Natural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use. Agroforestry Systems 1999:45:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006219721151
- About the Sustainable Development Goals—United Nations Sustainable Development [Online]. [Accessed: 30.01.2023]. Available: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
- Pelletier M.-C., Heagney E., Kovač M. Valuing recreational services: A review of methods with application to New South Wales National Parks. Ecosystem Services 2021:50:101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101315
- Palomo I., et al. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services 2013:4:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
- Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem services (CICES, Version 4.1). European Environment Agency, 2012. [Online]. [Accessed: 04.02.2023]. Available: https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2012/09/CICES-V4_Final_26092012.pdf
- Haines-Young R., Potschin M. B. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure, 2018.
- Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775302-4
- Towards a Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) for Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. [Online]. [Accessed: 07.02.2023]. Available: https://cices.eu/resources/
- KPMG. Expect the Unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. [Online]. [Accessed: 07.02.2023]. Available: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2012/08/building-business-value-part-1.pdf
- Vihervaara P., et al. Biophysical mapping and assessment methods for ecosystem services. Deliverable D3.3. EU Horizon 2020, ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007. [Online]. [Accessed: 08.02.2023]. Available: http://www.esmeralda-project.eu/getatt.php?filename=ESMERALDA%20D3.3_14966.pdf
- Ehrlich P. R., Ehrlich A. H. Extinction – the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York: Random House, 1981.
- Daily G. C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
- Costanza R., et al. The value of the World's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997:387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
- De Groot R., Wilson M. A., Boumans R. M. J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 2002:41(3):393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
- Wallace K. J. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 2007:139(3–4):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
- Fisher B., Turner R. K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 2009:68(3):643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
- Kumar P. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity): Ecological and Economic Foundations. London and Washington: Earthscan, 2010.
- Zahvoyska L., Soloviy I. Ecological Economics and Sustainable Forest Management. Economy of Ukraine 2008:3:92–95.
- Buksha I. F. Ukrainian forestry's contribution to reducing the risk of climate change. Some Aspects of Global Climate Change in Ukraine. Kyiv: FADA, 2002.
- Kauffman J., Hughes R., Heider C. Carbon pool and biomass dynamics associated with deforestation, land use, and agricultural abandonment in the neotropics. Ecological Applications 2009:19(5):1211–1222. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1696.1
- Saaty T., Joyce A. Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: Praeger, 1989.
- Zhang R., Zhang X., Yang J., Yuan H. Wetland ecosystem stability evaluation by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach in Yinchuan Plain, China. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2013:57(3–4):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.06.014
Language: English
Page range: 912 - 927
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2023
Published on: Dec 15, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2023 Bohdan Rusyn, Olga Alokhina, Mykola Korus, Daria Ivchenko, Natalia Pits, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.