On the Impact of Climate Change Policies on the Clean Technology Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data Analysis
By:
References
- United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015 [Online]. [Accessed: 15.04.2023]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
- Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Barrage L., Hémous D. Climate change, directed innovation, and energy transition: The long-run consequences of the shale gas revolution. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 2023:31657. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31657
- Sterner T., et al. Policy design for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability 2019:2(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0194-x
- Eugster J. The impact of environmental policy on innovation in clean technologies. IMF Working Papers 2021:213:1–32. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513589930.001
- Sung B. Do government subsidies promote firm-level innovation? Evidence from the Korean renewable energy technology industry. Energy Policy 2019:132:1333–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.009
- Weko S., Goldthau A. Bridging the low-carbon technology gap? Assessing energy initiatives for the Global South. Energy policy 2022:169:113192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113192
- van Beek L, Oomen J, Hajer M, Pelzer P, van Vuuren D. Navigating the political: An analysis of political calibration of integrated assessment modelling in light of the 1.5 °C goal. Environmental Science & Policy 2022:133:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.024
- Gawel E., Lehmann P., Korte K. et al. The future of the energy transition in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2014:4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-014-0015-7
- Jacobsson S. The emergence and troubled growth of a ‘biopower’ innovation system in Sweden. Energy Policy 2008:36(4):1491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.013
- Gao Y., Tsai S. B., Xue X., Ren T., Du X., Chen Q., Wang J. An empirical study on green innovation efficiency in the green institutional environment. Sustainability 2018:10(3):724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030724
- Probst B., Touboul S., Glachant M. et al. Global trends in the invention and diffusion of climate change mitigation technologies. Nature Energy 2021:6:1077–1086 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00931-5
- Pless J., Hepburn C., Farrell N. Bringing rigour to energy innovation policy evaluation. Nature Energy 2020:5:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0557-1
- Yu Y., Radulescu M., Ifelunini A. I. et al. Achieving carbon neutrality pledge through clean energy transition: Linking the role of green innovation and environmental policy in E7 countries. Energies 2022:15(17):6456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176456
- Abdmouleh Z., Alammari R. A., Gastli A. Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015:45:249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.035
- Schmidt T., Sewerin S. Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nature Energy 2017:2:17084. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.84
- Polzin F. Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation–A systematic review of barriers and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:77:525–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.007
- Nesta L., Vona F., Nicolli F. Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2014:67(3):396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001
- Kuzemko C., Bradshaw M., Bridge G. et al. Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 2020:68:101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685
- Sharma G. D, et al. Revisiting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models. Global Finance Journal 2022:51:100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100691
- Han P., et al. Assessing the recent impact of COVID-19 on carbon emissions from China using domestic economic data. Science of the Total Environment 2021:750:141688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141688
- Gupta S. D. Dirty and clean technologies. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2015:47(1):123–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2014.1
- Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., Hemous D. The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review 2012:102(1):131–66. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
- Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Hanley D., Kerr W. Transition to clean technology. Journal of Political Economy 2016: 124(1):52–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/684511
- Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400879762-024
- Stern N. The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
- Nordhaus W. D. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 2007:45(3):686–702. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.3.686
- Stavins R. N. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. In Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2003:1:355–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0099(03)01014-3
- Goulder L. H., Stavins R. N. Challenges from state-federal interactions in US climate change policy. American Economic Review 2011:101(3):253–257. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.253
- Brink C., Vollebergh H. R., van der Werf E. Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options. Energy Policy 2016:97:603–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.023
- van den Bergh J., Savin I. Impact of carbon pricing on low-carbon innovation and deep decarbonisation: Controversies and path forward. Environ Resource Econ 2021:80:705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00594-6
- Rausch S., Mowers M. Distributional and efficiency impacts of clean and renewable energy standards for electricity. Resource and Energy Economics 2014:36(2):556–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.09.001
- Shen C., Li S., Wang X., Liao Z. The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:254:120122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120122
- Joshi J. Do renewable portfolio standards increase renewable energy capacity? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 2021:287:112261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112261
- Zhao X., Mahendru M., Ma X., Rao A., Shang Y. Impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth in China: New guidelines regarding renewable energy and energy efficiency. Renewable Energy 2022:187:728–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.076
- Popp D. Innovation and climate policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2010:2(1):275–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103929
- Pitelis A., Vasilakos N., Chalvatzis K. Fostering innovation in renewable energy technologies: Choice of policy instruments and effectiveness. Renewable Energy 2020:151:1163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.100
- Ghorbal S., Farhani S., Youssef S. B. Do renewable energy and national patents impact the environmental sustainability of Tunisia? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022:29:5248–25262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17628-7
- Tang M., Cheng S., Guo W. et al. Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2023:25:11735–11767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02552-8
- Greenhalgh C., Rogers M. Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832231
- Grin J., Rotmans J., Schot J. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598
- Kivimaa P., Kern F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 2016:45(1):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
- Newell R. G., Pizer W. A. Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003:46(1):52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00031-1
- Hoepner A. G., Kant B., Scholtens B., Yu P. S. Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecological Economics 2012:77:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002
- Acemoglu D., Linn J. Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004:119(3):1049–1090. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502144
- Jaffe A. B., Palmer K. Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997:79(4):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
- Kivimaa P., Kern F. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 2016:45(1):205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
- Popp D. Environmental policy and innovation: A decade of research. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2019:13(3–4):265-–337. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000111
- EPO PATSTAT. The 2022 Autumn Edition [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/business/patstat.html
- EPO Patent classification [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.epo.org/news-events/in-focus/classification.html
- IEA Energy Technology Patents Data Explorer [Online]. [Accessed 23.03.2023]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-technology-patents-data-explorer
- Haščič I., Silva J., Johnstone N. The use of patent statistics for international comparisons and analysis of narrow technological fields, OECD Science Technology and Industry Working Papers 2015:05. https://doi.org/10.1787/5js03z98mvr7-en
- Kruse T., Dechezleprêtre A., Saffar R., Robert L. Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 2022:1703. https://doi.org/10.1787/90ab82e8-en
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC Switzerland, 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
- Koenker R., Ng P., Portnoy S. Quantile smoothing splines. Biometrika 1994:81(4):673–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.4.673
- Bloomfield P., Steiger W. L. Least absolute deviations: Theory, applications, and algorithms. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8574-5
- Nychka D., Gray G., Haaland P., Martin D., O’connell M. A nonparametric regression approach to syringe grading for quality improvement. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995:90(432):1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476623
Language: English
Page range: 850 - 863
Submitted on: Jan 4, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 11, 2023
Published on: Dec 2, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Mehmet Balcilar, Busra Agan, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.