Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Mapping Climate Change Mitigation Strategies Adopted by Industries: An Overview from First Commitment of Kyoto Protocol (2009–2023)

Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. UNFCCC. ICT Sector Helping to Tackle Climate Change. 2016. [Online]. [Accessed: 14.12.2022]. Available: https://www.unfccc.int/news/ict-sector-helping-to-tackle-climate-change
  2. Klenert D., Funke F., Mattauch L., O’Callaghan B. Five lessons from COVID-19 for advancing climate change mitigation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2020:76:751–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00453-w
  3. Sharifi A., Simangan D., Kaneko S. Three decades of research on climate change and peace: A bibliometrics analysis. Sustainability Science 2021:16(4):1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00853-3
  4. Hossain M. U., Wang L., Chen L., Tsang D. C., Ng S. T., Poon C. S., Mechtcherine V. Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong. Environment International 2020:145:106139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139
  5. IEA. Industry Sector Lead, Energy Technology Policy Division OECD Steel Committee, 2021.
  6. Kumaran K. S., Amarnath D, J., Renita A., Stalin P. Energy efficient technologies and contribution of industries. Recent Advances in Space Technology Services and Climate Change 2010:231–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/RSTSCC.2010.5712841
  7. Oshiro K., Fujimori S. Role of hydrogen-based energy carriers as an alternative option to reduce residual emissions associated with mid-century decarbonization goals. Applied Energy 2022:313:118803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118803
  8. Palea V., Santhià C. The financial impact of carbon risk and mitigation strategies: Insights from the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022:344:131001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131001
  9. Emodi N. V., Chaiechi T., Beg A. R. A. Are emission reduction policies effective under climate change conditions? A backcasting and exploratory scenario approach using the LEAP-OSeMOSYS Model. Applied Energy 2019:236:1183–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.045
  10. Katsoulakos N. M., Misthos L. M., Doulos I. G., Kotsios V. S. Chapter 8 - Environment and Development. Basic Principles, Human Activities, and Environmental Implications. Environment and Development 2016:499–569. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62733-9.00008-3
  11. Donthu N., Kumar S., Pattnaik D. Forty-five years of journal of business research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research 2020:109:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039
  12. Donthu N., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Pandey N., Lim W. M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 2021:133:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  13. Yuan B. Z., Sun J. Bibliometric analysis of research on the maize based on top papers during 2009–2019. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 2020:14(1):75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2020.1787110
  14. Niknejad N., Ismail W., Bahari M., Hendradi R., Salleh A. Z. Mapping the research trends on blockchain technology in food and agriculture industry: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2021:21:101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101272
  15. Pande M., Mulay P. Bibliometric survey of quantum machine learning. Science & Technology Libraries 2020:39(4):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2020.1776193
  16. Sganzerla W. G., Ampese L. C., Mussatto S. I., Forster-Carneiro T. A bibliometric analysis on potential uses of brewer’s spent grains in a biorefinery for the circular economy transition of the beer industry. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2021:15(6):1965–1988. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2290
  17. Zhou X., Wei X., Lin J., Tian X., Lev B., Wang S. Supply chain management under carbon taxes: A review and bibliometric analysis. Omega 2021:98:102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102295
  18. Khan D., Arjmandi M. K., Yuvaraj M. Most Cited Works on Cloud Computing: The ‘Citation Classics’ as Viewed through Dimensions. ai. Science & Technology Libraries 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1951424
  19. Shehata A., Eldakar M. An Exploration of Egyptian Facebook Users’ Perceptions and Behavior of COVID-19 Misinformation. Science & Technology Libraries 2021:40(4):390–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1925203
  20. Mohan B. S., Kumbar M. Scientometric analysis and visualization of solar physics research in India. Science & Technology Libraries 2020:39(2):189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2020.1715321
  21. Kang J. N., Wei Y. M., Liu, L. C., Han R., Yu B. Y., Wang J. W. Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review. Applied Energy 2020:263:114602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114602
  22. Owusu P. A., Asumadu-Sarkodie S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering 2016:3(1):1167990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990
  23. Muratori M., Calvin K., Wise M., Kyle P., Edmonds J. Global economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Environmental Research Letters 2016:11(9):095004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095004
  24. Bose B. P., Moumita D., Ghosh D. Stockholm Conference to Kyoto Protocol – A Review of Climate Change Mitigation Initiatives. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications 2022:4(2):338–350.
  25. van der Gaast W. Towards a future climate policy – from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. International Climate Negotiation Factors: Design, Process, Tactics 2017:91–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46798-6_5
  26. Haunschild R., Bornmann L., Marx W. Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PloS one 2016:11(7):e0160393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393
  27. Christensen L. D. A Bayesian game of resource exploitation in hinterland regions: modelling scenarios for sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2023:25(1):277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02052-1
  28. Jiang K., Ashworth P. The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021:138:110521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110521
  29. Strunge T., Naims H., Ostovari H., Olfe-Kräutlein B. Priorities for supporting emission reduction technologies in the cement sector – A multi-criteria decision analysis of CO2 mineralisation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022:340:130712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130712
  30. Ali S., Xu H., Yang K., Solangi Y. A. Environment management policy implementation for sustainable industrial production under power asymmetry in the graph model. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022:29:636–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.012
  31. Branco-Vieira M., Lopes M. P. C., Caetano N. Algae-based bioenergy production aligns with the Paris agreement goals as a carbon mitigation technology. Energy Reports 2022:8(S3):482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.081
  32. Fennell P. S., Davis S. J., Mohammed A. Decarbonizing cement production. Joule 2022:5(6):1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.011
  33. Habert G., Roussel N. Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives. Cement and Concrete Composites 2009:31(6):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001
  34. Vázquez-Rowe I., Ziegler-Rodriguez K., Laso J., Quispe I., Aldaco R., Kahhat R. Production of cement in Peru: Understanding carbon-related environmental impacts and their policy implications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019:142:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.017
  35. Ottaviani Aalmo G., Gioli B., Rodriguez D. G. P., Tuomasjukka D., Liu H. Y., Pastore M. C., Salbitano F., Bogetoft P., Sæbø A., Konijnendijk C. Development of a novel framework for the assessment and improvement of climate adaptation and mitigation actions in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2022:44. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.833098
  36. Hu Z. Towards solar extractivism? A political ecology understanding of the solar energy and agriculture boom in rural China. Energy Research & Social Science 2023:98:102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102988
  37. Liyong X., Yurong Y., Hongliang Z., Liping G., Zequn J., Yang Y., Yutong He. Path analysis of agricultural and rural emission reduction technology under the background of “two-carbon” strategy. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture (English and Chinese). 2022:30(4):527–534.
  38. Pratt C., Redding M., Hill J., Shilton A., Chung M., Guieysse B. Good science for improving policy: greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural manures. Animal Production Science 2014:55(6):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13504
  39. Sanz-Cobena A., Lassaletta L., Aguilera E., del Prado A., Garnier J., Billen G., Iglesias A., Sanchez B., Guardia G., Abalos D., Plaza-Bonilla D., Puigdueta-Bartolome I., Moral R., Galan E., Arriaga H., Merino P., Infante-Amate J., Meijide A., Pardo G., Alvaro-Fuentes J., Smith P. Strategies for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in Mediterranean agriculture: A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2017:238:5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.038
  40. Buitenhuis A. J., Pearce J. M. Open-source development of solar photovoltaic technology. Energy for Sustainable Development 2012:16(3):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.06.006
  41. Haddaway N. R., Cooke S. J., Lesser P., Macura B., Nilsson A. E., Taylor J. J., Raito K. Evidence of the impacts of metal mining and the effectiveness of mining mitigation measures on social–ecological systems in Arctic and boreal regions: a systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence 2019:8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z
  42. Hodgkinson J. H., Smith M. H. Climate change and sustainability as drivers for the next mining and metals boom: The need for climate-smart mining and recycling. Resources Policy 2021:74:101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.016
  43. Brunnhofer M., Gabriella N., Schöggl J. P., Stern T., Posch A. The biorefinery transition in the European pulp and paper industry–A three-phase Delphi study including a SWOT-AHP analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 2020:110:101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.02.006
  44. Panjaitan T. W. S., Dargusch P., Wadley D., Aziz A. A. A study of management decisions to adopt emission reduction measures in heavy industry in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports 2023:13(1):1413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28417-2
  45. Burchart-Korol D., Pichlak M., Kruczek M. Innovative technologies for greenhouse gas emission reduction in steel production. Metalurgija 2016:55(1):119–122.
  46. Haszeldine R. S., Flude S., Johnson G., Scott V. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2018:376(2119):20160447. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0447
  47. Shatokha V. Environmental sustainability of the iron and steel industry: Towards reaching the climate goals. European Journal of Sustainable Development 2016:5(4):289–289. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p289
  48. Shatokha V., Matukhno E., Belokon K., Shmatkov G. Potential Means to Reduce CO2 Emissions of Iron and Steel Industry in Ukraine Using Best Available Technologies. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy 2020:6(3):451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-020-00289-0
  49. Worrell E., Boyd G. Bottom-up estimates of deep decarbonization of US manufacturing in 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022:330:129758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129758
  50. Addison T., Roe A. Extractive industries: The management of resources as a driver of sustainable development. 2018. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817369.001.0001
  51. Zhang J., Liu L., Xie Y., Zhang Y., Guo H. An integrated optimization and multi-scale input–output model for interaction mechanism analysis of energy–economic–environmental policy in a typical fossil-energy-dependent region. Energy Strategy Reviews 2022:44:100947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100947
  52. Wang Z., Zhang B. Low-Carbon Consumption in China: Residential Behavior, Corporate Practices and Policy Implication. Springer Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2792-0
  53. Grodzińska-Jurczak M., Krawczyk A., Akhshik A., Dedyk Z., Strzelecka M. Contradictory or complementary? Stakeholders’ perceptions of a circular economy for single-use plastics. Waste Management 2022:142:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.036
  54. Lees J. C., Lees A. M., Gaughan J. B. The influence of shade availability on the effectiveness of the Dairy Heat Load Index (DHLI) to predict lactating cow behavior, physiology, and production traits. International Journal of Biometeorology 2022:66:289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02186-x
  55. Blackhurst M., Azevedo I. L., Matthews H. S., Hendrickson C. T. Designing building energy efficiency programs for greenhouse gas reductions. Energy Policy 2011:39(9):5269–5279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.037
  56. Chaiyapa W., Esteban M., Kameyama Y. Sectoral approaches establishment for climate change mitigation in Thailand upstream oil and gas industry. Energy Policy 2016:94:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.007
  57. Ciotta M., Peyerl D., Zacharias L. G. L., Fontenelle A. L., Tassinari C., Moretto E. M. CO2 storage potential of offshore oil and gas fields in Brazil. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2021:112:103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103492
  58. Kessler J., Schillo B., Shelby M., Haspel A. Is natural gas really the answer?: Targeting natural gas in US climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy 1994:22(7):623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90080-9
  59. Konschnik K. E., Boling M. K. Shale gas development: a smart regulation framework. Environmental Science & Technology 2014:48(15):8404–8416. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405377u
  60. Morgunova M., Shaton K. The role of incumbents in energy transitions: Investigating the perceptions and strategies of the oil and gas industry. Energy Research & Social Science 2022:89:102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102573
  61. Yan Z., Cui C., Liao C. The Impact of Green Finance on Clean Power Generation: Evidence Based on China. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 2021:40(4):421–436. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4046
  62. Zhang D., Zhang Z., Managi S. A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters 2019:29:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003
  63. Brown H. C. P. Climate change and Ontario forests: prospects for building institutional adaptive capacity. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2019:14:513–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9183-8
  64. Liu J., Wu F. Forest carbon sequestration subsidy and carbon tax as part of China’s forestry policies. Forests 2017:8(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030058
  65. Morzillo A.T., Colocousis C. R., Munroe D. K., Bell K. P., Martinuzzi S., Van Berkel D. B., Lechowicz M. J., Rayfield B., McGill B. ‘Communities in the middle’: Interactions between drivers of change and place-based characteristics in rural forest-based communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015:42:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.007
  66. Samariks V., Lazdiņš A., Bārdule A., Kalēja S., Butlers A., Spalva G., Jansons Ā. Impact of Former Peat Extraction Field Afforestation on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Hemiboreal Region. Forests 2023:14(2):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020184
  67. Xie S. H., Kurz W. A., McFarlane P. N. Inward-versus outward-focused bioeconomy strategies for British Columbia’s forest products industry: A harvested wood products carbon storage and emission perspective. Carbon Balance and Management 2021:16(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00193-4
  68. Zohrabian A., Sanders K. T. Emitting less without curbing usage? Exploring greenhouse gas mitigation strategies in the water industry through load shifting. Applied Energy 2021:298:117194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117194
  69. IEA. The Future of Hydrogen, IEA, Paris, 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.12.2022]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-hydrogen
  70. Chaturvedi U., Sharma M., Dangayach G. S., Sarkar P. Evolution and adoption of sustainable practices in the pharmaceutical industry: An overview with an Indian perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:168:1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.184
  71. Solomon K. R., Velders G. J., Wilson S. R., Madronich S., Longstreth J., Aucamp P. J., Bornman J. F. Sources, fates, toxicity, and risks of trifluoroacetic acid and its salts: Relevance to substances regulated under the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 2016:19(7):289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1175981
  72. Tomás R. A. F., Ribeiro F. R., Santos V. M. S., Gomes J. F. P., Bordado J. C. M. Assessment of the impact of the European CO2 emissions trading scheme on the Portuguese chemical industry. Energy Policy 2010:38(1):626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.066
  73. Rashidi-Sabet S., Madhavaram S. A strategic marketing framework for emerging out of the climate change social trap: The case of the fashion industry. Journal of Macromarketing 2022:42(2):267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467211058083
  74. Oluseyi P. O., Babatunde O. M., Babatunde O. A. Assessment of energy consumption and carbon footprint from the hotel sector within Lagos, Nigeria. Energy and Buildings 2016:118:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.046
  75. Karlsson I., Rootzén J., Johnsson F. Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains–Analysis of a Swedish road construction project. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020:120:109651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109651
  76. Hertwich E. G., Ali S., Ciacci L., Fishman T., Heeren N., Masanet E., Wolfram P. Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics – a review. Environmental Research Letters 2019:14(4):043004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3
  77. Daka E. Adopting Clean Technologies to Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Africa: a Systematic Literature Review. Environmental Management 2023:71(1):87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01704-w
  78. Dooley K. Routines, rigidity and real estate: Organisational innovations in the workplace. Sustainability 2017:9(6):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060998
  79. Brouhle K., Harrington D. R. Firm strategy and the Canadian voluntary climate challenge and registry (VCR). Business Strategy and the Environment 2009:18(6):360–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.604
  80. Hennenberg K. J., Dragisic C., Haye S., Hewson J., Semroc B., Savy C., Wiegmann K., Fehrenbach H., Fritsche U. R. The power of bioenergy-related standards to protect biodiversity. Conservation Biology 2010:24(2):412–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01380.x
  81. Odeku K., Meyer E. Climate change surge: Implementing stringent mitigation and adaptation strategies in South Africa. Journal of African Law 2010:54(2):159–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855310000033
  82. Tyler E., du Toit M., Burchell Z. White certificates and white certificate trading schemes as greenhouse gas mitigation policy options for South Africa. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 2011:22(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2011/v22i1a3200
  83. Franco A., Salza P. Strategies for optimal penetration of intermittent renewables in complex energy systems based on techno-operational objectives. Renewable Energy 2011:36(2):743–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.022
  84. Dodds R., Kelman I., Thiesen N., McDougall A., Garcia J., Bessada T. Industry perspectives on carbon-offset programs in Canada and the United States. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 2012:8(2):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908094
  85. Buitenhuis A. J., Pearce J. M. Open-source development of solar photovoltaic technology. Energy for Sustainable Development 2012:16(3):379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.06.006
  86. Liu C. H., Lin S. J., Lewis C. Environmental impacts of electricity sector in Taiwan by using input-output life cycle assessment: The role of carbon dioxide emissions. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 2012:12(5):733–744. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.04.0090
  87. Feldpausch-Parker A. M., O’Byrne M., Endres D., Peterson T. R. The Adventures of Carbon Bond: Using a melodramatic game to explain CCS as a mitigation strategy for climate change. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2013:3(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1298
  88. Pereira L. G. R. Evaluation methods and enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 26(Suplemento). 2013:264–277.
  89. Singer A. M., Branham M., Hutchins M. G., Welker J., Woodard D. L., Badurek C. A., Ruseva T., Marland E., Marland G. The role of CO2 emissions from large point sources in emissions totals, responsibility, and policy. Environmental Science & Policy 2014:44:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.001
  90. Hammond G. P., Spargo J. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: A UK perspective. Energy Conversion and Management 2014:86:476–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.030
  91. He J. K. Objectives and strategies for energy revolution in the context of tackling climate change. Advances in Climate Change Research 2015:6(2):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2015.08.005
  92. Sonter L. J., Barrett D. J., Moran C. J., Soares-Filho B. S. Carbon emissions due to deforestation for the production of charcoal used in Brazil’s steel industry. Nature Climate Change 2015:5(4):359–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2515
  93. Antimiani A., Costantini V., Kuik O., Paglialunga E. Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments. Ecological Economics 2016:128:246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.003
  94. Sugiri A., Buchori I. Towards low emission development: Prospects of applying MBIs in the industrial sector of Central Java, Indonesia. Am. J. Environ. Sci 2016:12(3):225–236. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2016.225.236
  95. Bilalis D., Roussis I., Fuentes F., Kakabouki I., Travlos I. Organic agriculture and innovative crops under Mediterranean conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2017:45(2):323–331. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha45210867
  96. Cullen B. R., MacLeod N. D., Scanlan J. C., Doran-Browne N. Influence of climate variability and stocking strategies on greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), production and profit of a northern Queensland beef cattle herd. Animal Production Science 2016:58(6):990–997. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15608
  97. Tagomori I. S., Carvalho F. M., da Silva F. T., Merschmann P. R. D. C., Rochedo P. R., Szklo A., Schaeffer R. Designing an optimum carbon capture and transportation network by integrating ethanol distilleries with fossil-fuel processing plants in Brazil. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2018:68:112–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.10.013
  98. Martinez S., Marchamalo M., Alvarez S. Organization environmental footprint applying a multi-regional input-output analysis: A case study of a wood parquet company in Spain. Science of the Total Environment 2018:618:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.306
  99. Vázquez-Rowe I., Ziegler-Rodriguez K., Laso J., Quispe I., Aldaco R., Kahhat R. Production of cement in Peru: Understanding carbon-related environmental impacts and their policy implications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019:142:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.017
  100. Vilaboa-Arroniz J., Lopez-Collado J., Platas-Rosado D. E., Vilaboa-Arroniz I. The myth of biofuels in Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2019:22(2). https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2474
  101. Cunha M., Richter C. Climate-induced cyclical properties of regional wine production using a time-frequency approach in Douro and Minho Wine Regions. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola 2022:35(1):16–29. https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20203501016
  102. Panahi H. K. S., Dehhaghi M., Aghbashlo M., Karimi K., Tabatabaei M. Conversion of residues from agro-food industry into bioethanol in Iran: An under-valued biofuel additive to phase out MTBE in gasoline. Renewable Energy 2020:145:699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.081
  103. Breyer C., Fasihi M., Aghahosseini A. Carbon dioxide direct air capture for effective climate change mitigation based on renewable electricity: a new type of energy. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2020:25:43– 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-9847-y
  104. Kaltsatou A., Notley S. R., Flouris A. D., Kenny G. P. An exploratory survey of heat stress management programs in the electric power industry. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2021:18(9):436–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2021.1954187
  105. Ravikumar C., Ganapathy M., Karthikeyan A., Senthilvalavan P., Manivannan R. Integrated nutrient managementpromising way to reduce carbon dioxide and methane emission in flooded rice ecosystem: A review. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2021:13(1):385–395. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v13i1.2570
  106. Tcvetkov P. Climate policy imbalance in the energy sector: Time to focus on the value of CO2 utilization. Energies 2021:14(2):411. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020411
  107. Akel A. J. N., Hovstad J., Ruth M., Parmeggiani S., Patriarca R., Paltrinieri N. A Machine Learning Approach to Analyze Natural Hazards Accidents Scenarios. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2022:91:397–402. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2291067
  108. Hashim H., Zubir M. A., Kamyab H., Zahran M. F. I. Decarbonisation of the Industrial Sector Through Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Offset, and Emission Trading Schemes. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2022:97:511–516. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2297086
  109. Janipour Z., de Gooyert V., Huijbregts M., de Coninck H. Industrial clustering as a barrier and an enabler for deep emission reduction: a case study of a Dutch chemical cluster. Climate Policy 2022:22(3):320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2025755
  110. Lee J., Kim S., You S., Park Y. K. Bioenergy generation from thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomassbased integrated renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2023:178:113240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113240
  111. Patel D., Shrivastava R., Tiwari R. P., Yadav R. K. Properties of cement mortar in substitution with waste fine glass powder and environmental impact study. Journal of Building Engineering 2020:27:100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100940
  112. Majumder S., Neogi S., Dutta T., Powel M. A., Banik P. The impact of biochar on soil carbon sequestration: metaanalytical approach to evaluating environmental and economic advantages. Journal of Environmental Management 2019:250:109466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109466
  113. Amundson R., Biardeau L. Opinion: Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018:115(46):11652–11656. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815901115
  114. Leffel B. Climate consultants and complementarity: Local procurement, green industry and decarbonization in Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 2022:88:102635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102635
  115. Zhao K., Huang G., Luo B., Wu Y. A factorial interval chance-constrained diet model for dairy farms under climate change: A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022:360:132059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132059
  116. Rashidi-Sabet S., Madhavaram S. A strategic marketing framework for emerging out of the climate change social trap: The case of the fashion industry. Journal of Macromarketing 2022:42(2):267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467211058083
  117. Alleway H. K., Jones A. R., Theuerkauf S. J., Jones R. C. A global and regional view of the opportunity for climatesmart mariculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2022:377(1854):20210128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0128
  118. Mahabir J., Bhagaloo K., Koylass N., Boodoo M. N., Ali R., Guo M., Ward K. What is required for resource-circular CO2 utilization within Mega-Methanol (MM) production? Journal of CO2 Utilization 2021:45:101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101451
  119. Portugal-Pereira J., Koberle A., Lucena A. F., Rochedo P. R., Império M., Carsalade A. M., Schaeffer R., Rafaj P. Interactions between global climate change strategies and local air pollution: lessons learnt from the expansion of the power sector in Brazil. Climatic Change 2018:148(1):293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2193-3
  120. Banerjee S. B. Corporate environmental strategies and actions. Management Decision 2001:39(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005405
  121. Jha C. K., Gupta V., Chattopadhyay U., Sreeraman B. A. Migration as adaptation strategy to cope with climate change: A study of farmers’ migration in rural India. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2018:10(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0059
  122. Mkonda M. Y. Awareness and adaptations to climate change among the rural farmers in different agro-ecological zones of Tanzania. Management of Environmental Quality 2022:33(6):1502–1527. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2021-0241
  123. Oxford Analytica. Investment and policy key to meeting hydrogen goals. Expert Briefings 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB270889
  124. Dwivedi Y. K., Hughes L., Kar A. K., Baabdullah A. M., Grover P., Abbas R., Andreini D., Abumoghli I., Barlette Y., Bunker D., Kruse L. C., Constantiou I., Davidon R. M., De R., Dubey R., Fenby-Taylor H., Gupta B., He W., Kodama M., Mantymaki M., Wade M. Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management 2022:63:102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456
  125. Rahman S. M., Kirshner J., Groh S., Rahman S. M. A Review of the Energy-employment Nexus in. Bangladesh: Rural-urban Electrification and Sectoral Occupation Patterns. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 2022:317–344. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4134
  126. Mezzanotte V., Marazzi F., Ficara E., Mantovani M., Valsecchi S., Cappelli F. First Result son the Removal of Emerging Micropollutants from Municipal Centrate by Microalgae. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0004
  127. Alam S., Masukujjaman M., Lin C., Omar N., Na M., Othman A. Factors Affecting Photo Voltaic Solar Energy Usage Intention in Rural Households in Bangladesh: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):276–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0021
  128. Terjanika V., Vetrinska L., Pubule J. CO2 as Resource. Society’s Willingness to Pay Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):806–821. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0061
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0057 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 775 - 796
Submitted on: May 13, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 21, 2023
Published on: Nov 26, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2023 Puja Singh, Preeti Mulay, Yogesh Patil, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.