Parisi G., et al. Protein hunger of the feed sector: the alternatives offered by the plant world. Ital J Anim Sci 2020:19(1):1205–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1827993
Chen Y., et al. Effects of the replacement of fishmeal by soy protein concentrate on growth performance, apparent digestibility, and retention of protein and amino acid in juvenile pearl gentian grouper. PLoS One 2019:14(12):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222780
Kaiser F., Harbach H., Schulz C. Rapeseed proteins as fishmeal alternatives: A review. Rev Aquac 2022:14(4):1887–1911. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12678
Maiolo S., et al. Fishmeal partial substitution within aquafeed formulations: life cycle assessment of four alternative protein sources. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2020:25(8):1455–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11367-020-01759-Z
Luthada-Raswiswi R., Mukaratirwa S., O’brien G. Animal protein sources as a substitute for fishmeal in aquaculture diets: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2021:11(9):3854. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093854
van Huis A., Oonincx D. G. A. B. The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 2107:37(5):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
Siddiqui S. A., et al. Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) and their affinity for organic waste processing. Waste Management 2022:140:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.044
Liu C., et al. Growth Performance and Nutrient Composition of Mealworms (Tenebrio Molitor) Fed on Fresh Plant Materials-Supplemented Diets. Foods 2020:9(2):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020151
Yaghoubi M., et al. Dietary replacement of fish meal by soy products (soybean meal and isolated soy protein) in silvery-black porgy juveniles (Sparidentex hasta). Aquaculture 2016:464:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.06.002
Samuel-Fitwi B., et al. Aspiring for environmentally conscious aquafeed: comparative LCA of aquafeed manufacturing using different protein sources. J Clean Prod 2013:52:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.031
Goglio P., et al. The Environmental Impact of Partial Substitution of Fish-Based Feed with Algae- and Insect-Based Feed in Salmon Farming. Sustainability 2022:14(19):12650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912650
Modahl I. S., Brekke A. Environmental performance of insect protein: a case of LCA results for fish feed produced in Norway. SN Appl Sci 2022:4(6):183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05065-1
Zlaugotne B., et al. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Microalgae and Synthetic Astaxanthin Pigments. Env Clim Tech 2023:27(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0018
Zlaugotne B., et al. Life cycle assessment of fish feed for oil alternatives-environmental impact of microalgae, rapeseed and fish oil. Agr Res 2023:21. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.074
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO, 2006.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14044 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO, 2006.
Dreyer M., et al. Environmental life cycle assessment of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) production for human consumption in Austria – a comparison of mealworm and broiler as protein source. Int J L Cycl Asses 2021:26(11):2232–2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01980-4