Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Bibliometric Analysis of the Alternative Biomass Types and Biomass Combustion Technologies

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. Fulton L. M. Transportation and Energy Policy. (Eds.) Cutler J. Cleveland, Encyclopedia of Energy, Elsevier, 2004:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00496-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bertolini M., Conti F. Algae Culture Conditions and Process Parameters for Phycoremediation and Biomaterials Production. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0082
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Suzdalenko V., Gedrovics M., Zake M., Barmina I. Regulation possibilities of biomass combustion. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2012:8(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-012-0008-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Vamza I., Krigers G., Valters K. A Review of Bio-Based Adhesives from Primary and Secondary Biomass for Wood Composite Applications. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1350–1360. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0102
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Laganovska I., Feofilovs M., Blumberga D. Forestry Sector Resource Optimization with TIMES. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1279–1298. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0097
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Patel N., Blumberga D. Insights of Bioeconomy: Biopolymer Evaluation Based on Sustainability Criteria. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2023:27(1):323–338. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Spalvins K., Blumberga D. Production of Fish Feed and Fish Oil from Waste Biomass Using Microorganisms: Overview of Methods Analyzing Resource Availability. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):149–164. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-0010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Zaman B., Samadikun B. P., Hardyanti N., Purwono P. Waste to Energy: Calorific Improvement of Municipal Solid Waste through Biodrying. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):176–187. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. AI-Jawhari I. F. H. Chapter 21 – Application of nanoscience in alternative energies. In Devasahayam S., Hussain C. M. (eds.) Nano Tools and Devices for Enhanced Renewable Energy, Elsevier, 2021:543–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821709-2.00007-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Hoang D. L., Davis C., Moll H. C., Nonhebel S. Can multiple uses of biomass limit the feedstock availability for future biogas production? An overview of biogas feedstocks and their alternative uses. Energies 2020:13(11):2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112747
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Lange L., et al. The importance of fungi and of mycology for a global development of the bioeconomy. IMA Fungus 2012:3(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2012.03.01.09
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Bosman R., Rotmans J. Benchmarking Finnish and Dutch bioeconomy transition governance. 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Priedniece V., Kalnins E., Kirsanovs V., Dzikevics M., Blumberga D., Veidenbergs I. Sprayed Water Flowrate, Temperature and Drop Size Effects on Small Capacity Flue Gas Condenser’s Performance. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):333–346. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0099
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Klavins M., Bisters V., Burlakovs J. Small Scale Gasification Application and Perspectives in Circular Economy. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):42–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-0003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Porsnovs D., Ansone-Bertina L., Kviesis J., Arina D., Klavins M. Biochar from Waste Derived Fuels as Low-Cost Adsorbent for Waste Hydrocarbons. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):174–187. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0095
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Tijs L., et al. Database of biomass conversion technologies. 2016. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2023]. Available: https://bioeast.eu/bioeconomy-list/database-of-biomass-conversion-technologies/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Dzikevics M., Jaunzems D., Terauds M. Bibliometric Analysis of the Solar Thermal System Control Methods. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0084
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Yuan R., et al. Research Priorities and Trends on Bioenergy: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022:19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315881
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Geovanni Ferrari F. M., Pezzuolo A., Nizami A.-S. Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Biomass for Bioenergy Research. Energies 2020:13(14):3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143714
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Chen G., Xiao L. Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. J. Informetr. 2016:10(1):212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Pesta B., Fuerst J., Kirkegaard E. O. W. Bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000–2016) of intelligence articles. J. Intell. 2018:6(4):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Okubo Y. Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples. 1997.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Coskun E., White S. Web Science: Mapping the Curriculum ocr. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM WEB Science conference (WEBSCI ‘17). 2017:241–245. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091511
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Klavans R., Boyack K. W. Is there a convergent structure of science? A comparison of maps using the ISI and scopus databases. Proceedings of ISSI, 11th International conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Moral-Muñoz J. A., et al. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date Review. Profesional De La información 2020:29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Alexander J. O. Library Applications. In Bidgoli H., Ed. Encyclopedia of Information Systems. New York: Elsevier, 2003:55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227240-4/00104-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Grout I. Chapter 5 – Introduction to Digital Logic Design. In I. Grout, Ed. Digital Systems Design with FPGAs and CPLDs, Burlington: Newnes, 2008:217–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8397-5.00005-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010:84:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 559 - 569
Submitted on: Apr 2, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 8, 2023
Published on: Oct 13, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Alternative biomass,
biomass combustion,
bibliometric analysis,
combustion technologies,
renewable energy sources
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2023 Oskars Svedovs, Mikelis Dzikevics, Vladimirs Kirsanovs, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)Next article