Insights of Bioeconomy: Biopolymer Evaluation Based on Sustainability Criteria
By:
References
- Heimann T. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs?
Earths Future 2018:7(1):43–57.https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014 - OECD. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2004. Paris: OECD, 2004.
- De Besi M., McCormick K. Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, regional and industrial strategies.
Sustainability (Switzerland) 2015:7(8).https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461">https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461 - Thorenz A.,
et al. Assessment of agroforestry residue potentials for the bioeconomy in the European Union.J Clean Prod 2018:176:348–359.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.143">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.143 - Sanz-Hernández A., Esteban E., Garrido P. Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences.
J Clean Prod 2019:224:107–119.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168 - Maraveas C. Production of sustainable and biodegradable polymers from agricultural waste.
Polymers 2020:12(5):1127.https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127">https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127 - Awasthi M. K.,
et al. Agricultural waste biorefinery development towards circular bioeconomy.Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022:158:112122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112122">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112122 - Gil A.,
et al. Mixture optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of tomato and cucumber waste.Env Tech 2015:36:2628–2636.https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1041425">https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1041425 - Yaashikaa P. R.,
et al. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review.Bioresour Technol 2022:343(2):126126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126126">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126126 - Prakash K. S.,
et al. Utilization of Agricultural Waste Biomass and Recycling Towards Circular Bioeconomy.Environ Sci Pollut Res 202:30:8526–85392.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20669-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20669-1 - Lau W. W. Y.,
et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution.Science 2020:369(6510):1455–1461.https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABA9475">https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABA9475 - Chia W. Y.,
et al. Nature’s fight against plastic pollution: Algae for plastic biodegradation and bioplastics production.Env Sci Ecotech 2020:4:100065.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100065">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2020.100065 - Gowthaman N. S. K.,
et al. Chapter 15 - Advantages of biopolymers over synthetic polymers: social, economic, and environmental aspects.Biopol Ind App 2021:351–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00015-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819240-5.00015-8 - Talan A.,
et al. Biorefinery strategies for microbial bioplastics production: Sustainable pathway towards Circular Bioeconomy.Bioresour Technol Rep 2022:17:100875.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100875">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100875 - Patel N., Feofilovs M., Blumberga D. Agro Biopolymer: A Sustainable Future of Agriculture-State of Art Review.
Env Clim Techn 2022:26:499–511.https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0038">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0038 - Lin R.,
et al. Sustainability prioritization framework of biorefinery: A novel multi-criteria decision-making model under uncertainty based on an improved interval goal programming method.J Clean Prod 2020:251:119729.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119729">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119729 - Krzyżaniak M., Stolarski M. J. Life cycle assessment of camelina and crambe production for biorefinery and energy purposes.
J Clean Prod 2019:237:117755.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117755">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117755 - Papadaskalopoulou C.,
et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of a waste to ethanol biorefinery system versus conventional waste management methods.Resour Conserv Recycl 2019:149:130–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.006 - Karayılan S.,
et al. Prospective evaluation of circular economy practices within plastic packaging value chain through optimization of life cycle impacts and circularity.Resour Conserv Recycl 2021:173:105691.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105691">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105691 - Van de velde K., Kiekens P. Biopolymers: Overview of several properties and consequences on their applications.
Polym Test 2002:21(4):433–442.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00107-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00107-6 - Wellisch M.,
et al. Biorefinery systems-potential contributors to sustainable innovation.Biof Bioprod Bioref 2010:4(3):275–286.https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.217">https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.217 - Budzinski M., Nitzsche R. Comparative economic and environmental assessment of four beech wood based biorefinery concepts.
Bioresour Technol 2016:216:613–621.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.111">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.111 - Helbig C.,
et al. Extending the geopolitical supply risk indicator: Application of life cycle sustainability assessment to the petrochemical supply chain of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers.J Clean Prod 2016:137:1170–1178.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.214">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.214 - Gironi F., Piemonte V. Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: Strengths and weaknesses.
En Sour Part A: Recov, Utiliz Env Ef 2011:33(21):1949–1959.https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030903436830">https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030903436830 - Vlachokostas C.,
et al. Supporting decision making to achieve circularity via a biodegradable waste-to-bioenergy and compost facility.J Environ Manage 2021:285:112215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112215">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112215 - Agarwal S. Major factors affecting the characteristics of starch based biopolymer films.
Eur Polym J 2021:160:110788.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110788">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110788 - Hertwich E. G.,
et al. Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening.Environ Toxicol Chem 2001:20(4):928–939.https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200431">https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200431 - Taherimehr M.,
et al. Trends and challenges of biopolymer-based nanocomposites in food packaging.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2021:20(6):5321–5344.https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12832">https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12832 - Marvin A. W.,
et al. Economic Optimization of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Supply Chain.Chem Eng Sci 2012:67(1):68–79.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.055">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.055 - Mtibe A.,
et al. Synthetic Biopolymers and Their Composites: Advantages and Limitations an Overview.Macromol Rapid Commun 2021:42(15):2100130.https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202100130">https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202100130 - Galiano F.,
et al. Advances in biopolymer-based membrane preparation and applications.J Memb Sci 2018:564:562–586.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.059">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.059 - Momani B. L. Assessment of the Impacts of Bioplastics: Energy Usage, Fossil Fuel Usage, Pollution, Health Effects, Effects on the Food Supply, and Economic Effects Compared to Petroleum Based Plastics. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2009.
- Spierling S.,
et al. Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments.J Clean Prod 2018:185:476–491.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014 - Emadian S. M, Onay T. T., Demirel B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments.
Waste Manag 2017:59:526–536.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.006 - Jem K. J., Tan B. The development and challenges of poly (lactic acid) and poly (glycolic acid).
Adv Ind Eng Pol Res 2020:3(2):60–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002 - Maraveas C. Production of sustainable and biodegradable polymers from agricultural waste.
Polymers 2020:12(5):1127.https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127">https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12051127 - Rezvani G. E.,
et al. The life cycle assessment for polylactic acid (PLA) to make it a low-carbon material.Polymers 2021:13(11):1854.https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111854">https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111854 - Chalermthai B.,
et al. Life cycle assessment of bioplastic production from whey protein obtained from dairy residues.Bioresour Technol Rep 2021:15:100695.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100695">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100695 - Wellenreuther C., Wolf A., Zander N. Cost structure of bio-based plastics: A Monte-Carlo-analysis for PLA.
HWWI Res Pap 2021:197.http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235600 - Lackner M. Biopolymers. Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. New York: Springer, 2015.
- EUBP_Facts_and_figures [Online]. [Accessed 18.10. 2022]. Available:
http://www.european-bioplastics.org/ - McAdam B.,
et al. Production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and factors impacting its chemical and mechanical characteristics.Polymers 2020:12(12):2908.https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122908">https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122908 - Harding K. G.,
et al. Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis.J Biotechnol 2007:130(1):57–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.012 - Nonato R., Mantelatto P., Rossell C. Integrated production of biodegradable plastic, sugar and ethanol.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001:57:1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100732">https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100732 - Vilpoux O., Averous L. Starch-based plastics. Technology, use and potentialities of Latin American starchy tubers. Book 3, Chapter 18. Sao Paolo: NGO Raízes and Cargill Foundation, 2004:521–553.
- Hazrol M. D.,
et al. Corn starch (Zea mays) biopolymer plastic reaction in combination with sorbitol and glycerol.Polymers 2021:13(2):242.https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020242">https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020242 - Yusoff N.H.,
et al. Recent trends on bioplastics synthesis and characterizations: Polylactic acid (PLA) incorporated with tapiocastarch for packaging applications.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.129954">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.129954 - DeLéis C. M.,
et al. Environmental and energy analysis of biopolymer film based on cassavastarch in Brazil.J Clean Prod 2017:143:76–89.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.147">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.147 - Singh R., Kaur S., Sachdev P.A.A cost effective technology for isolation of potato starch and its utilization in formulation of ready to cook, non-cereal, and non-glutinous soup mix.
J Food Meas Char 2021:15:3168–3181.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00887-w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00887-w - Muneer F.,
et al. Preparation, Properties, Protein Cross-Linking and Biodegradability of Plasticizer-Solvent Free Hemp Fibre Reinforced Wheat Gluten, Glutenin, and Gliadin Composites.Bioresources 2014:9(3):5246–5261.10.15376/biores.9.3.5246-5261">http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.3.5246-5261 - Jones A., Mandal A., Sharma S. Protein-based bioplastics and their antibacterial potential.
J Appl Polym Sci 2015:132(18):41931.https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41931">https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41931 - Carvalho-Silva L. B.,Vissotto F. Z., Amaya-Farfan J. Physico-Chemical Properties of Milk Whey Protein Agglomerates for Usein Oral Nutritional Therapy.
Food Nutr Sci 2013:4:9B.https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.49a2010">https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.49a2010 - Thammahiwes S., Riyajan S. A., Kaewtatip K. Preparation and properties of wheat gluten based bioplastics with fish scale.
J Cereal Sci 2017:75:186–191.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.04.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.04.003 - Chalermthai B.,
et al. Techno-economic assessment of whey protein-based plastic production from a co-polymerization process.Polymers 2020:12(4):847.https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12040847">https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12040847 - Foroughi F.,
et al. A review onthe life cycle assessment of cellulose: From properties to the potential of making it a low carbonmaterial.Materials 2021:14(4):714.https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040714">https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040714 - Tejado A.,
et al. Energy requirements for the disintegration of cellulose fibers into cellulose nanofibers.Cellulose 2012:19:831–842.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9694-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9694-4 - Mohanty A. K.,
et al. Development of Renewable Resource-Based Cellulose Acetate Bioplastic: Effect of Process Engineering on the Performance of CellulosicPlastics.Polym Eng Sci 2003:43(5):1151–1161.https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10097">https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10097 - Rentoy F.,
et al. Development of Cellulose-based Bioplastic from Corn Stalks. 2018. - Yadav P.,
et al. Assessment of the environmental impact of polymeric membrane production.J Memb Sci 2021:622:118987.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118987">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118987 - Amaral H. R.,
et al. Production of high-purity cellulose, cellulose acetate and cellulose-silica composite from babassu coconut shells.Carbohydr Polym 2019:210:127–134.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.061">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.061 - Molenveld K.,
et al. Biobased plastics 2020. Wageningen: Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, 2020. - Kurka T. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the regional sustainability of bioenergy developments.
Energy 2013:62:393–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.053">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.053 - Pamucar D., Bozanic D., Kurtov D. Fuzzification of the Saaty’s scale and a presentation of the hybrid fuzzy AHPTOPSIS model: An example of the selection of a brigade artillery group firing position in a defensive operation.
Vojnotehnicki Glasnik 2016:64(4):966–986.https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9262">https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9262 - Szybowski J., Kułakowski K., Prusak A. New inconsistency indicators for incomplete pairwise comparisons matrices.
Math Soc Sci 2020:108:138–145.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.05.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2020.05.002 - Ahmed S., Vedagiri P., KrishnaRao K. V. Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using objective based Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Int J Pav Res Tech 2017:10(2):158–170.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.01.001 - Laininen P., Hämäläinen R. P. Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression.
Eur J Oper Res 2003:148(3):514–524.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00430-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00430-7 - Sahabuddin M., Khan I. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods for energy sector’s sustainability assessment: Robustness analysis through criteria weight change.
Sustainable Energy Tech Assessments 2021:47:101380.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101380">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101380 - Dymova L., Sevastjanov P., Tikhonenko A. A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method.
Expert Syst Appl 2013:40(12):4841–4847.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.022">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.022 - Gadakh V. S. Application of MOORA method for parametric optimization of milling process.
Int J Appl Eng Res 2011:1(4):743–758. - Thakkar J. J. Complex Proportion Assessment Method (COPRAS).
Mul-Crit Dec Mak 2021:336:219–237.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_13">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_13 - Sayadi M. K., Heydari M., Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers.
Appl Math Model 2009:33(5):2257–2262.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002 - Zlaugotne B.,
et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison.Env Clim Tech 2020:24(1):454–471.https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028 - French S., Roy B. Multi-criteria Methodology for Decision Aiding.
J Oper Res Soc 1997:48(12):1257–1258.https://doi.org/10.2307/3010757">https://doi.org/10.2307/3010757 - Chang Y. H., Yeh C. H., Chang Y. W. A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making.
App S Comp J 2013:13(4):2179–2187.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.009 - Zanakis S. H.,
et al. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods.Eur J Oper Res 1998:107(3):507–529.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 - Ozcan T., Elebi N., Esnaf A. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem.
Expert Syst Appl 2011:38(8):9773–9779.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022 - Lakshmi T. M., Venkatesan V. P., Martin A. An Identification of Better Engineering College with Conflicting Criteria using Adaptive TOPSIS.
Int J Mod Educ Comp Sc 2016:8(5):19–31.https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2016.05.03">https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2016.05.03 - Wątróbski J.,
et al. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection.Omega 2019:86:107–124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004 - Farah S., Anderson D. G., Langer R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications. A comprehensive review.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016:107:367–392.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 - Nandakumar A., Chuah J. A., Sudesh K. Bioplastics: A boon or bane?
Ren Sust En Rev 2021:147:111237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111237">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111237 - Venkatachalam H., Palaniswamy R. Bioplastic World: A Review.
J Adv Sci Res 2020:11(3):43–53.http://sciensage.info/index.php/JASR/article/view/505 - Ilyas R. A.,
et al. Polylactic acid (Pla) biocomposite: Processing, additive manufacturing and advanced applications.Polymers 2021:13(8):1326.https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081326">https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081326 - Sayyed R. Z.,
et al. Production of biodegradable polymer from agro-wastes in alcaligenes sp. and pseudomonas sp.Molecules 2021:26(9):2443.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092443">https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092443 - Sharma V., Sehgal R., Gupta R. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Properties and Modifications.
Polymer 2021:212:123161.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123161">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123161 - Liu H.,
et al. Biopolymer poly-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from apple industrial waste residues: A review.Chemosphere 2021:284:131427.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131427">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131427 - Birania S.,
et al. Advances in development of biodegradable food packaging material from agricultural and agroindustry waste.J Food Proc Eng 2022:45(1):e13930.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13930">https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13930 - Nazrin A.,
et al. Nanocellulose Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch (TPS), Polylactic Acid (PLA), and Polybutylene Succinate (PBS) for Food Packaging Applications.Front Chem 2020:8:213.https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00213">https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00213 - Ranganathan S.,
et al. Utilization of food waste streams for the production of biopolymers.Heliyon 2020:6(9):e04891.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04891">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04891 - Motaung T. E., Linganiso L. Z. Critical review on agrowaste cellulose applications for biopolymers.
Int J Plas Tech 2018:22:185–216.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-018-9219-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-018-9219-6 - Makarov I. S.,
et al. Structure, Morphology, and Permeability of Cellulose Films.Membranes 2022:12(3):297.https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030297">https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030297
Language: English
Page range: 323 - 338
Submitted on: Jan 24, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2023
Published on: Jul 15, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Nidhiben Patel, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.