European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality. Brussels: EC, 2021.
European Commission. Renewable energy targets. [Online]. [Accessed: 30.03.2023]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/renewable-energy-directive-targets-and-rules/renewable-energy-targets_en
European Commission. Mainstreaming RES: flexibility portfolios: design of flexibility portfolios at Member State level to facilitate a cost-efficient integration of high shares of renewables. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.
Bolwig S., et al. Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019:101:440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee, the committee of the regions and the European investment bank. A Clean Planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. Brussels: EC, 2018.
Demirtas O., et al. Which renewable energy consumption is more efficient by fuzzy EDAS method based on PESTLE dimensions? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021:28(27):36274–36287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13310-0
Kansongue N., Njuguna J., Vertigans S. A PESTEL and SWOT impact analysis on renewable energy development in Togo. Front. Sustain. 2023:3(990173). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.990173
Song J., Sun Y., Jin L. PESTEL analysis of the development of the waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017:80:276–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.066
Valencia G. E., Cardenas Y. D., Acevedo C. H. PEST analysis of wind energy in the world: From the worldwide boom to the emergent in Colombia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018:1126:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012019
Zoričić D., et al. Integrated Risk Analysis of Aggregators: Policy Implications for the Development of the Competitive Aggregator Industry. Energies 2022:15(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145076
Jasper F. B., et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a battery home storage system based on primary data. J. Clean. Prod. 2022:366:132899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132899
Thaker S., et al. Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emission footprints of thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power applications. J. Energy Storage 2019:26:100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100992
Chakraborty M. R., et al. A Comparative Review on Energy Storage Systems and Their Application in Deregulated Systems. Batteries 2022:8(9):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8090124
Behabtu H. A., et al. A Review of Energy Storage Technologies. Application Potentials in Renewable Energy Sources Grid Integration. Sustainability 2020:12(24):10511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410511
European Commission. Database of the European energy storage technologies and facilities – Data Europa EU. [Online]. [Accessed: 30.03.2023]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/database-of-the-european-energy-storage-technologies-and-facilities?locale=en
Danish Energy Agency. Technology Data for Energy Storage. 2018 [Online]. [Accessed: 30.03.2023]. Available: https://ens.dk/en/our-services/projections-and-models/technology-data/technology-data-energy-storage
European Association for Storage of Energy. Energy Storage Technologies [Online]. [Accessed: 30.03.2023]. Available: https://ease-storage.eu/energy-storage/technologies/
European Association for Storage of Energy, Energy Storage Policy Developments in 2022. [Online]. [Accessed: 30.03.2023]. Available: https://ease-storage.eu/news/energy-storage-policy-developments-in-2022/
Madurai Elavarasan R., et al. A novel Sustainable Development Goal 7 composite index as the paradigm for energy sustainability assessment: A case study from Europe. Appl. Energy 2022:307:118173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118173
Armin Razmjoo A., Sumper A., Davarpanah A. Development of sustainable energy indexes by the utilization of new indicators: A comparative study. Energy Rep. 2019:5:375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.006
Maia L. K. K., et al. Expanding the lifetime of Li-ion batteries through optimization of charging profiles. J. Clean. Prod. 2019:225:928–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.031
Bakkaloglu S., Cooper J., Hawkes A. Methane emissions along biomethane and biogas supply chains are underestimated. One Earth 2022:5(6):724–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.012
Osman A. I., et al. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022:20(1):153–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8