On Carbon Substitution and Storage Factors for Harvested Wood Products in the Context of Climate Change Mitigation in the Norwegian Forest Sector
References
- Sathre R., O’Connor J. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environmental Science & Policy 2010:13(2):104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005
- Leskinen P., et al. Substitution effect of wood-based products in climate change mitigation. From science to policy 7. Joensuu: European Forest Institute. 2018.
- Repo A., Tuomi M., Liski J. Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy 2010:3:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01065.x
- Holstmark B. Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Climatic Change 2012:112:415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0222-6
- Pingoud K., Ekholm T., Savolainen I. Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2012:17:369–386.
- Röder M., Thornley P. Waste wood as bioenergy feedstock. Climate change impacts and related emission uncertainties from waste wood based energy systems in the UK. Waste Management 2018:74:241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.042.
- Jåstad E., Bolkesjø T. F. Modelling emission and land-use impacts of altered bioenergy use in the future energy system. Energy 2023:265:126349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126349
- Hurmekoski E., et al. Impact of structural changes in wood-using industries on net carbon emissions in Finland. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2020:24(4):899–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12981
- Soimakallio S., et al. Climate change mitigation challenge for wood utilization – the case of Finland. Environmental Science & Technology 2016:50(10):5127–5134. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b00122
- Suter F., Steubing B., Hellweg S. Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of Wood along the Value Chain: The Case of Switzerland. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2017:21(4):874–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12486
- Muñoz I., Campra P., Fernández-Alba A. R. Including CO2-emission equivalence of changes in land surface albedo in life cycle assessment. Methodology and case study on greenhouse agriculture. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2010:15(7):672–681.
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC, 2014.
- Myhre G., et al. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
- IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories – A primer, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Japan: IGES, 2006.
- IPCC. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Geneva: IPCC, Switzerland, 2019.
- Norwegian Environment Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2019: National Inventory Report. Oslo: Norwegian Environment Agency, 2021.
- IPCC. Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol. Geneva: IPCC, 2014.
- Marland E. S., Stellar K., Marland G. H. A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2010:15(1):71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9205-6
- Iordan C. M., et al. Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Carbon Balance and Management 2018:13(1):12.
- Werner F., et al. National and global greenhouse gas dynamics of different forest management and use scenarios: a model-based assessment. Environmental Science and Policy 2010:13(1):72–85.
- Lecocq F., et al. Paying for forest carbon or stimulating fuelwood demand? Insights from the French Forest Sector Model. Journal of Forest Economics 2011:2:157–168.
- Kallio A. M. I., Salminen O., Sievänen R. Sequester or substitute - Consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland. Journal of Forest Economics 2013:19(4):402–415.
- Braun M., et al. A holistic assessment of greenhouse gas dynamics from forests to the effects of wood products use in Austria, Carbon Management, 2016:7(5–6):271–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1230990
- Norwegian Environment Agency. Norway. 2021 Common Reporting Format (CRF) Table, 2021. [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://unfccc.int/documents/273426
- Bramming J. Physical and Mechanical Properties in Norwegian Spruce and Pine: An Activity in the SSFF Project. Report 65. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Wood Technology, 2006.
- Repola J. Models for vertical wood density of Scotch Pine, Norway Spruce and birch stems, and their application to determinate average wood density. Silva Fennica 2006:40(4):673–685. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.322
- Heräjärvi H. Variation of basic density and brinell hardness within mature Finnish Betula Pendula and B. Pubescens stems. Wood and Fiber Science 2004:36(2):216–227.
- Shen L., Patel M. Life Cycle Assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Lenzinger Berichte 2010:88:1–59.
- Schultz T., Suresh A. Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Ten Sources of Manmade Cellulose Fiber. Emeryville: SCS Global Services, 2017.
- FAO. FAOSTAT data base. Forestry production and trade [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO
- Process21. Biobasert prosessindustri. Prosess21 ekspertgrupperapport [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: www.prosess21.no
- Braun M., et al. Apparent half-life-dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011. Forest Policy and Economics 2016:63:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.008
- Karjalainen T., Kellomäki S., Pussinen A. Role of wood-based products in absorbing atmospheric carbon. Silva Fennica 1994:28(2):67–80.
- Pingoud K., Perälä A., Pussinen A. Carbon dynamics in wood products. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2001:6:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011353806845
- Skog K. E., Nicholson G. A. Carbon sequestration in wood and paper products, the impact of climate change on America’s forests: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. Fort Collins, CO: Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-59. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2000:79–88.
- Vandenbroucke M. Rapport- Technische levensduur van gebouwcomponenten (Technical lifetime of components in construction). Mechelen: OVAM, 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23706.88002 (in Dutch)
- Nabuurs G. J., Sikkema R. Application and Evaluation of the Alternative IPCC Methods for Harvested Wood Products in the National Communications. Proceedings for the IPCC Expert Meeting on Evaluating approaches for estimating net emissions from harvested wood products. Wageningen, 1998.
- Irle M., et al. Recycling waste fibreboard. Proceedings of IPPS 2019.
- Guest G., Strømman A. H. Climate Change Impacts Due to Biogenic Carbon: Addressing the Issue of Attribution Using Two Metrics with Very Different Outcomes. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2014:33(3):298–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2013.872997
- Fossdal S. Energi og miljøregnskap for bygg (Energy and environmental accounting for construction). Oslo: NBI, 1995. (in Norwegian)
- Menzies G. F. Whole Life Analysis of Timber, Modified Timber and Aluminium-Clad Timber Windows: Service Life Planning (SLP), Whole Life Costing (WLC) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University, 2013.
- Asif M., Muneer T., Kubie J. Sustainability analysis of window frames. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 2005:26(1):71–87. https://doi.org/10.1191/0143624405bt118tn
- Coelho P., Silva A., de Brito J. How long can a wood flooring system last? Buildings 2021:11(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010023
- Nyrud A. Q., et al. Innovative wood building materials- climate change and improved life. Treteknisk rapport 2015.
- Myllyviita T., et al. Wood substitution potential in greenhouse gas emission reduction–review on current state and application of displacement factors. Forest Ecosystems 2021:8(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00326-8
- Härtl F. H., Höllerl S., Knoke T. A new way of carbon accounting emphasises the crucial role of sustainable timber use for successful carbon mitigation strategies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2017:22(8):1163–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9720-1
- Rüter S., et al. ClimWood2030 ‘Climate benefits of material substitution by forest biomass and harvested wood products: Perspective 2030’ Final Report. Braunschweig: Thunen-Institut, 2016.
- Shen L., Worrell E., Patel M. K. Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2010:55(2):260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.001
- Knauf M., et al. Modeling the CO2-effects of forest management and wood usage on a regional basis. Carbon Balance and Management 2015:10:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0024-7
- Hunton Fiber AS. Environmental product declaration Trefiberisolasjon Innblåst, 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 15.09.2022]. Available at https://www.epd-norge.no/isolasjon/hunton-trefiberisolasjon-innblast-article2685-321.html
- Hunton Fiber AS. Environmental product declaration Trefiberisolasjon Plate, 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 15.09.2022]. Available at https://www.epd-norge.no/isolasjon/hunton-trefiberisolasjon-innblast-article2685-321.html
- Schulte M., Lewandowski I., Pude R., Wagner M. Comparative life cycle assessment of bio-based insulation materials: Environmental and economic performances. GCB Bioenergy 2021:13(6):979–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12825
- Hunton Fiber AS. Vi skal øke markedsandelen i isolasjonsmarkedet (We shall increase the market share in isolation markets). 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://www.hunton.no/nyheter/hunton-skal-okemarkedsandelen-i-isolasjonsmarkedet/ (in Norwegian)
- Hunton Fiber AS. Fra tre til trefiber (From tree to woodfibre). 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://www.hunton.no/nyheter/fra-flis-til-trefiber/ (in Norwegian)
- European Parliament. The impact of textile production and waste on the environment 2021 [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20201208STO93327/the-impact-of-textile-production-and-waste-on-the-environment-infographic
- Kallio A. M. I. Wood-based textile fibre market as part of the global forest-based bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics 2021:123:102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102364
- Treindustrien. Nøkkeltal (Key figures). 2021 [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: www.treindustrien.no/nokkeltall (in Norwegian)
- Sandberg D., et al. The role of the wood mechanical industry in the Swedish forest industry cluster. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2014:29(4):352–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.932005
- Directive 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Official Journal of European Union 2018:L 328/82.
- Moazzem S., et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Apparel Consumption in Australia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):71–111. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0006
- Södra. 2023. Oncemore [Online]. [Accessed 17.6.2023]. https://www.sodra.com/en/global/pulp/oncemore/
- Watson D., et al. Kartlegging av brukte tekstiler og tekstilavfall i Norge (Mapping used textiles and textile waste in Norway). PlanMiljø, NORSUS, 2020. (in Norwegian)
- Ioncell [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://ioncell.fi/
- Spinnova [Online]. [Accessed 15.12.2022]. Available: https://spinnova.com/technology/
- Hunton Fiber AS. Isolere fornybart og lagre CO2 (Isolate with renewably and store carbon). Gjøvik: Hunton, 2017. (in Norwegian)
- Schlamadinger B., et al. Bioenergy strategies and the global carbon cycle. Scientific Geological Bulletin 1997:50:157–182.
- Pingoud K., Pohjola J., Valsta L. Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fennica 2010:44:1:166. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.166
- Strimbu V., Eid T., Gobakken T. A forest stand growth and yield simulator for the Norwegian forest sector. 2023. Unpublished manuscript. (Submitted)
- Brunet-Navarro P., et al. Climate mitigation by energy and material substitution of wood products has an expiry date. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:303:127026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127026
- Mathiesen B. V., Münster M., Fruergaard T. Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2009:17(15):1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009
- Smyth C., et al. Climate change mitigation potential of local use of harvest residues for bioenergy in Canada. GCB Bioenergy 2017:9(4):817–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12387
- Soimakallio S., et al. On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2021:26(1):1–17.
- Kallio A. M. I., Solberg B. Leakage of forest harvest changes in a small open economy: case Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2018:33(5):502–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1427787
- Solberg B., et al. Wood for food: Economic impacts of sustainable use of forest biomass for salmon feed production in Norway. Forest Policy and Economics 2021:122:102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102337
- Spalvins K., Blumberga D. Production of Fish Feed and Fish Oil from Waste Biomass Using Microorganisms: Overview of Methods Analyzing Resource Availability. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22:149–164. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-0010
Language: English
Page range: 254 - 270
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2023
Published on: Jun 25, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 A. Maarit I. Kallio, Silke Houtmeyers, Ana Aza, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.