Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Value Behaviour Norm Theory Approach to Predict Private Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviour among University Students Cover

Value Behaviour Norm Theory Approach to Predict Private Sphere Pro-Environmental Behaviour among University Students

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. [1] Singh J. S., Koushal A., Kumar A., Shobhit R. Vimal S., R., Vijai K., Gupta V. K. Book review: microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity-Vol. II: functional application. Frontiers in Microbiology 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Gladman T., Hlatshwayo T. N. Pro-Environmental behaviour in student residences at Rhodes University, South Africa. Sustainability 2018:10(8):2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082746
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Akintunde E. A. Theories and concepts for human behavior in environmental preservation. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, 2017. https://doi.org/10.26502/jesph.96120012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Li X., Yu J., Jaroniec M., Chen X. Cocatalysts for selective photoreduction of CO2 into solar fuels. Chemical Reviews 2019:119(6):3962–4179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00400
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Vlek C., Steg L. Human Behavior and Environmental Sustainability: Problems, Driving Forces, and Research Topics. Journal of Social Issues 2007:63(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Grant, Adam M. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review 2007:32(2):393–417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Singh R., Singh S., Parihar P., Mishra R. K., Tripathi D. K., Singh V. P., Chauhan D. K., Prasad S. M. Reactive oxygen species (ROS): beneficial companions of plants’ developmental processes. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016:7:1299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01299
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Pope F. Laudato Si’: On care for our common home. Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286827-79
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Arya B., Chaturvedi S. Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Explain Energy Saving Behaviour. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):516–528. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Alam Syed S., Lin Chieh-Yu, Maisarah A., Omar Nor A., Ali M. H. Factors Affecting Energy-Efficient Household Products Buying Intention: Empirical Study. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging Pro-Environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009:29(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Dornhoff M., Sothmann J.-N., Fiebelkorn F., Menzel S. Nature relatedness and environmental concern of young people in Ecuador and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology 2019:10:453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00453
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Abend G. Moral decisionism and its discontents. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2019:49(1):59–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12191
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] De Groeve B., Bleys B. Less meat initiatives at Ghent University: Assessing the support among students and how to increase it. Sustainability 2017:9(9):1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091550
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Coelho F., Pereira M. C., Cruz L., Simóes P., Barata E. Affect and the adoption of Pro-Environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2017:54:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Lee Y.-K., Kim S., Kim M., Choi J. Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of Pro-Environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research 2014:67(10):2097–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Nässén J. Determinants of greenhouse gas emissions from Swedish private consumption: Time-series and crosssectional analysis. Energy 2014:66:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Pisano I., Lubell M. Environmental behavior in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environment and Behavior 2017:49:31–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515600494
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Poškus M. S. Investigating Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Lithuanian University Students. Current Psychology 2018:37:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9506-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Tabi A. Does Pro-Environmental behaviour affect carbon emissions? Energy Policy 2013:63:72–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Tam K.-P., Chan H.-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with Pro-Environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2017:53:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Tam K.-P., Chan H.-W. Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and Pro-Environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change 2018:48:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Stern P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000:56(3): 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991:50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Ajzen I. Laws of human behavior: Symmetry, compatibility, and attitude-behavior correspondence. Multivariate Research Strategies 2005:3–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Stern P. C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G. A., Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 1999:6(2):81–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Schwartz, Shalom H. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1977:10:221–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Steg L., De Groot J. Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology 2010:49(4):725–743. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X477745
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Schwartz S. H. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992:25:1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Schwartz S. H. Are there Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues 1992:50(4):19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Stern P. C., Dietz T., Kalof L., Guagnano G. A. Values, beliefs and Pro-Environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 1995:25:322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Kaiser F. G., Schultz P. W. The Attitude–Behavior Relationship: A Test of Three Models of the Moderating Role of Behavioral Difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2009:39(1):186–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00435.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Bamberg S., Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of Pro-Environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007:27(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Gifford R. Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology 2014:65:541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Schwartz S. H., Howard J. H. Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behaviour 1984:229–255. Springer, Boston, MA, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2645-8_14
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Yuriev A., Mehdi D., Paille P., Olivier B., Guillaumie L. Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2020:155:104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Rogers R. W. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology 1975:91(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Dunlap R. E. The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education 2008:40(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Ture R. S., Ganesh M. P. Understanding Pro-Environmental behaviours at workplace: Proposal of a model. Asia – Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation 2014:10(2):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X14536219
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Whitley C. T., Takahashi B., Zwickle A., Besley J. C., Lertpratchya A. P. Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research 2018:24(2):245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250151
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Lozano R., Lukman R., Lozano F. J., Huisingh D., Lambrechts W. Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:48:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Fielding K. S., Head B. D. Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research 2012:18(2):171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Piyapong J., Thidarat B., Jaruwan C., Siriphan N., Passanan A. Enhancing citizens’ sense of personal responsibility and risk perception for promoting public participation in sustainable groundwater resource management in Rayong Groundwater Basin, Thailand. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2019:9:100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100252
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Lozano R. Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006:14(9–11):787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Zsóka Á., Szerényi Z. M., Széchy A., Kocsis T. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday Pro-Environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:48:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology 2014:49(3):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] De Leeuw A., Valois P., Ajzen I., Schmidt P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying Pro-Environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2015:42:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Sia A. P., Hungerford H. R., Tomera A. N. Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 1986:17(2):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1986.9941408
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Kaiser F. G., Ranney M., Hartig T., Bowler P. A. Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist 1999:4(2):59–74. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.4.2.59
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Ellen P. S., Wiener J. L., Cobb-Walgren C. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 1991:10(2):102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000206
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Smith-Sebasto N. J., D’Costa A. Designing a Likert-type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. The Journal of Environmental Education 1995:27(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1995.9941967
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Karp D. G. Values and their effect on Pro-Environmental behavior. Environment and Behaviour 1996:28(1):111–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596281006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Nordlund A. M., Garvill J. Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 2002:34(6):740–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237244
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] De Groot J. I. M., Steg L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 2008:40(3):330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] Dunlap R. E., Van Liere K. D. The ‘new environmental paradigm. The Journal of Environmental Education 1978:9(4):10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Dunlap R. E., Van Liere K. D., Mertig A., Jones R. E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000:56(3)425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Steg L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005:25(4):415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Guagnano G. A., Stern P. C., Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 1995:27(5):699–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595275005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] Tanner C. Constraints on environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999:19(2):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0121
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Martínez P., Inés C., Poveda C. A. The Importance of Science, Technology and Innovation in the Green Growth and Sustainable Development Goals of Colombia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. [61] Widegren U., Jiang X. J., Krook A., Chibalin A. V., Björnholm M., Tally M., Roth R. A., Henriksson J., Wallberg-Henriksson H., Zierath J. R. Divergent effects of exercise on metabolic and mitogenic signaling pathways in human skeletal muscle. The FASEB Journal 1998:12(13):1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.12.13.1379
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. [62] Wynveen C. J., Kyle G. T., Tarrant M. A. Study abroad experiences and global citizenship: Fostering Pro- Environmental behavior. Journal of Studies in International Education 2012:16(4):334–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311426782
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. [63] Hau C. C. (ed.) Handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. 5th Edition. World Scientific, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1142/9503
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. [64] Han H., Yoon H. J. Hotel customers’ environmentally responsible behavioral intention: Impact of key constructs on decision in green consumerism. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2015:45:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.11.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. [65] Wynveen C. J., Wynveen Brooklynn J., Sutton Stephen G. Applying the value-belief-norm theory to marine contexts: Implications for encouraging Pro-Environmental behavior. Coastal Management 2015:43(1):84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2014.989149
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. [66] Jiro H., Perlaviciute G., Steg L. Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2018:53:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. [67] Yeboah F. K., Kaplowitz M. D. Explaining energy conservation and environmental citizenship behaviors using the value-belief-norm framework. Human Ecology Review 2016:22(2):137–159.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  68. [68] Steg, L., Dreijerink L., Abrahamse W. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005:25(4):415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  69. [69] Zepeda L., Deal D. Organic and local food consumer behaviour: Alphabet theory. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2009:33(6):697–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00814.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  70. [70] Muizniece I., Zihare L., Blumberga D. Obtaining the Factors Affecting Bioeconomy. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):277–291. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  71. [71] Jansson J., Marell A., Nordlund A. Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value- belief-norm theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2011:10(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.346
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  72. [72] Menzel S., Bogeholz S. Values, Beliefs and Norms that Foster Chilean and German Pupils’ Commitment to Protect Biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2010:5(1):31–49.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  73. [73] Slimak M. W., Dietz T. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis 2006:26(6):1689–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  74. [74] Pascarella E. T., Terenzini P. T. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Vol 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley, Indianapolis. 2005.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  75. [75] Astin A. W. Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus: How are students affected? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 1993:25(2):44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1993.9940617
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  76. [76] Sheldon R. A. Green solvents for sustainable organic synthesis: state of the art. Green Chemistry 2005:7(5):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1039/b418069k
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  77. [77] De Groot J. I. M., Steg L. Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2007:38(3):318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107300278
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  78. [78] Stern P. C., Dietz T., Guagnano G. A. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 1995:27(6):723–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595276001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  79. [79] Zhang J., Lü F., Shao L., He P. The use of biochar-amended composting to improve the humification and degradation of sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology 2014:168:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.080
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  80. [80] Markowitz E. M., Shariff A. F. Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change 2012:2(4):243–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1378
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  81. [81] Fagioli F. F., Paolotti L., Boggia A. Trends in Environmental Management Systems Research. A Content Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  82. [82] Wei M.-M., Zhang Y.-T., Guo A.-M., Liu J.-J., Xing Y., Sun Q.-F. Magnetothermoelectric transport properties of multiterminal graphene nanoribbons. Physical Review B 2016:93(24):245432. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245432
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  83. [83] Wesley S. P., Oskamp S. Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: General environmental concern and recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly 1996:59(4):375–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787078
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  84. [84] Kaiser. F. G., Wilson M. Goal-directed conservation behaviour: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences 2004:36(7):1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  85. [85] Bartlett M. S. The effect of standardization on a χ2 approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika 1951:38(3/4):337–344. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332580
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  86. [86] Fidell L. S., Tabachnick B. G. Preparatory data analysis. Handbook of Psychology: Research Methods in Psychology 2 2003:115–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0205
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  87. [87] Hair J. F., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning 2013:46(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  88. [88] Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, 1993.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  89. [89] Kim H., Stepchenkova S., Yilmaz S. Destination extension: A faster route to fame for the emerging destination brands? Journal of Travel Research 2019:58(3):440–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518754407
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  90. [90] Steg L., De Groot J. I. M. Environmental values. In Susan D. Clayton (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, 2012:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  91. [91] Tamar M., Wirawan H., Arfah T., Putri R. P. S. Predicting Pro-Environmental behaviours: the role of environmental values, attitudes and knowledge. Management of Environmental Quality 2020:32(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0264
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  92. [92] Steg L., Bolderdijk J. W., Keizer K., Perlaviciute G. An integrated framework for encouraging Pro-Environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental psychology 2014:38:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  93. [93] Van Petegem P., Blieck A. The environmental worldview of children: a cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Education Research 2006:12(5):625–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601053662
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 164 - 176
Submitted on: Apr 20, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 10, 2023
Published on: Apr 16, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Altruistic values,
biospheric values,
egoistic values,
environmental behaviour
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2023 Bhavana Arya, Harshita Kumar, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 27 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)Next article