Have a personal or library account? Click to login
LCA of Zero Valent Iron Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Algal Biomass for Polishing Treated Effluents Cover

LCA of Zero Valent Iron Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Algal Biomass for Polishing Treated Effluents

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By: Valeria Mezzanotte,  Francesco Romagnoli,  Baiba Ievina,  Marco Mantovani,  Martina Invernizzi,  Elena Ficara and  Elena Collina  
Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. [1] Koul B., Sharma K., Shah M. P. Phycoremediation: A sustainable alternative in wastewater treatment (WWT) regime. Environmental Technology and Innovation 2022:25:102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102040 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Rude K., Yothers C., Barzee T. J., Kutney S., Zhang R., Franz A. Growth potential of microalgae on ammonia-rich anaerobic digester effluent for wastewater remediation. Algal Research 2022:62:102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102613 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102613
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Mu R., Jia Y., Ma G., Liu L., Hao K., Qi F., Shao Y. Advances in the use of microalgal-bacterial consortia for wastewater treatment: Community structures, interactions, economic resource reclamation, and study techniques. Water Environment Research 2021:93(8):1217–1230. https://doi.org//10.1002/wer.1496 10.1002/wer.149633305497
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Mantovani M., Marazzi F., Fornaroli R., Bellucci M., Ficara E., Mezzanotte V. Outdoor pilot-scale raceway as a microalgae-bacteria sidestream treatment in a WWTP. Science of the Total Environment 2020:710:135583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135583 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13558331785903
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Mezzanotte V., Marazzi, F., Ficara, E., Mantovani, M., Valsecchi, S., Cappelli, F. First results on the removal of emerging micropollutants from municipal centrate by microalgae. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):36–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0004 10.2478/rtuect-2022-0004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Liu R., Li S., Tu Y., Hao X., Qiu F. Recovery of value-added products by mining microalgae. Journal of Environmental Management 2022:307:114512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114512 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11451235066198
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Choi H. I., Sung Y. J., Hong M. E., Han J., Min B. K., Sim S. J. Reconsidering the potential of direct microalgal biomass utilization as end-products: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022:155:111930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111930 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111930
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Antonelli M., Benzoni S., Bergna G., Bernardi M., Bertanza G., Cantoni B., Delli Compagni R., Gugliandolo M.C., Malpei F., Mezzanotte V., Pannuzzo B., Porro E. Contaminazione e rimozione di microinquinanti emergenti in acque reflue e in acque destinate al consumo umano. (Contamination and removal of emerging micropollutants in wastewater and water intended for human consumption). In: Tartari G., Bergna G., Lietti M., Rizzo A., Lazzari F. e Brioschi C. GdL-MIE. Inquinanti Emergenti. Lombardy Energy Cleantech Cluster: Milano, 2020. (In Italian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Gusmaroli L., Mendoza E., Petrovic M., Buttiglieri G. How do WWTPs operational parameters affect the removal rates of EU Watch list compounds? Science of the Total Environment 2020:714:136773. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136773 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13677332018966
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Rizzo L., Malato S., Antakyali D., Beretsou V. G., Đolić M. B., Gernjak W., Heath E., Ivancev-Tumbas I., Karaolia P., Ribeiro A. R. L., Mascolo G., McArdell C. S., Schaar H., Silva A. M. T., Fatta-Kassinos D. Consolidated vs new advanced treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern from urban wastewater. Science of the Total Environment 2019:655:986–1008. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.265 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.26530577146
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Crane R. A., Scott T. The removal of uranium onto carbon-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron particles. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2014:16:2813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2813-4 10.1007/s11051-014-2813-4427436425544828
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Hoch L. B., Mack E. J., Hydutsky B. W., Hershman J. M., Skluzacek J. M., Mallouk T. E. C]arbothermal synthesis of carbon-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron particles for the remediation of hexavalent chromium. Environmental Science & Technology 2008:42(7):2600–2605. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702589u 10.1021/es702589u18505003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Sunkara B., Zhan J., He J., McPherson G. L., Piringer G., John, V. T. Nanoscale zerovalent iron supported on uniform carbon microspheres for the in situ remediation of chlorinated hydrocarbons. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2010:2(10):2854–2862. https://doi.org/10.1021/am1005282 10.1021/am1005282
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Qiu G., Wu Y., Qi L., Chen C., Bao L., Qiu M. Study on the Degradation of Azo Dye Wastewater by Zero-valent Iron. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 2018:17(2):479–483.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Bonaiti S., Calderon B., Collina E., Lasagni M., Mezzanotte V., Saez N. A., Fullana A. Nitrogen activation of carbon-encapsulated zero-valent iron nanoparticles and influence of the activation temperature on heavy metals removal. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 14–16 April 2017, 2017:64(1):012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/64/1/012070 10.1088/1755-1315/64/1/012070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Li Z., Lowry G. V., Fan J., Liu F., Chen J. High molecular weight components of natural organic matter preferentially adsorb onto nanoscale zero valent iron and magnetite. Science of the Total Environment 2018:628–629:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.038 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.03829432929
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Ambika S., Devasena M., Nambi I. M. Single-step removal of Hexavalent chromium and phenol using meso zerovalent iron. Chemosphere 2020:248:125912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125912 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12591232006826
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Arvaniti O. S., Hwang Y., Andersen H. R., Stasinakis A. S., Thomaidis N. S., Aloupi M. Reductive degradation of perfluorinated compounds in water using Mg-aminoclay coated nanoscale zero valent iron. Chemical Engineering Journal 2015:262:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.079 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.079
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Sevilla M., Fuertes A. B. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 2009:47(9):2281–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Mantovani M., Collina E., Lasagni M., Marazzi F., Mezzanotte V. Production of microalgal-based carbon encapsulated iron nanoparticles (ME-nFe) to remove heavy metals in wastewater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22506-x 10.1007/s11356-022-22506-x36008581
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Tua C., Ficara E., Mezzanotte V., Rigamonti L. Integration of a side-stream microalgae process into a municipal wastewater treatment plant: A life cycle analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 2021:279:111605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111605 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11160533168296
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] International Organization for Standardization, 2006a. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework. ISO 14040.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] International Organization for Standardization, 2006b. Environmental management. Life cycle assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Zampori L., Pant R. Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, EUR 29682 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2760/424613
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Lucchetti M. G., Paolotti L., Rocchi L., Boggia A. The Role of Environmental Evaluation within Circular Economy: An Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Method in the Detergents Sector. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):238–257. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0066 10.2478/rtuect-2019-0066
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Diaz F., Vignati J. A., Marchi B., Paoli R., Zanoni S., Romagnoli F. Effects of Energy Efficiency Measures in the Beef Cold Chain: A Life Cycle-based Study. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):343–355. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0025 10.2478/rtuect-2021-0025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Jolliet O., Margni M., Charles R., Humbert S., Payet J., Rebitzer G., Rosenbaum R. IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2003:8:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505 10.1007/BF02978505
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Wernet G., Bauer C., Steubing B., Reinhard J., Moreno-Ruiz E., Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Characterisation factors of the ILCD Recommended Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods. Database and Supporting Information. EUR 25167. Publications Office of the European Union, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Schau E., Castellani V., Fazio S., et al. Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: new methods and differences with ILCD. Publications Office, 2018. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/671368
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] World Meteorological Organization, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project. Report No. 44. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1998. 1999.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Fantke P., Bijster M., Guignard C., Hauschild M., Huijbregts M., Jolliet O., Kounina A., Magaud V., Margni M., McKone T. E., Posthuma L., Rosenbaum R. K., van de Meent D., van Zelm R. USEtox® 2.0 Documentation (Version 1). 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.06.2022]. Available: http://usetox.org
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Henderson A. D., Hauschild M. Z., Van de Meent D., Huijbregts M. A. J., Larsen H. F., Margni M., McKone T. E., Payet J., Rosenbaum R. K., Jolliet O. USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2011:16:701–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0294-6 10.1007/s11367-011-0294-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Milà I Canals L., Bauer C., Depestele J., Dubreuil A., Knuchel R. F., Gaillard G., Michelsen O., Müller-Wenk R., Rydgren B. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2007:12(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.05.250 10.1065/lca2006.05.250
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Frischknecht R., Steiner N., Jungbluth N. The Ecological Scarcity Method – Eco-Factors 2006. A method for impact assessment in LCA. Environmental studies no. 0906. Federal Office for the Environment. Bern, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Schneider L., Berger M., Finkbeiner M. Abiotic resource depletion in LCA: background and update of the anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) model. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2015:20:709–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0864-0 10.1007/s11367-015-0864-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Jolliet O., Brent A., Goedkoop M., Itsubo N., Mueller-Wenk R., Peña C., Schenk R., Stewart M., Weidema B. LCIA Definition Study of the SETAC-UNEP Life Cycle Initiative. UNEP. 2003. [Online]. [Accessed: 14.06.2022]. Available: https://lca-net.com/files/LCIA_defStudy_final3c.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Collet P., Hélias A., Lardon L., Ras M., Goy R., Steyer J. Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production. Bioresource Technology 2011:102(1):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.154 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.15420674343
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Arashiro L. T., Montero N., Ferrer I., Aci´en F. G., Gomez C., Garfì M. Life cycle assessment of high rate algal ponds for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. Science of the Total Environment 2018:622–623:1118–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.051 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.05129890581
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Roy P., Dutta A., Gallant J. Hydrothermal carbonization of peat moss and herbaceous biomass (miscanthus): A potential route for bioenergy. Energies 2018:11(10):2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102794 10.3390/en11102794
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Mendoza J. L., Granados M. R., de Godos I., Acién F. G., Molina E., Banks C., Heaven S. Fluid-dynamic characterization of real-scale raceway reactors for microalgae production. Biomass Bioenergy 2013:54:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.017 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Matamoros V., Gutiérrez R., Ferrer I., García J., Bayona J. M. Capability of microalgae-based wastewater treatment systems to remove emerging organic contaminants: A pilot-scale study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2015:288:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.002 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.00225682515
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Mantovani M., Collina E., Marazzi F., Lasagni M., Mezzanotte V. Microalgal treatment of the effluent from the hydrothermal carbonization of microalgal biomass. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2022:49:102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102976 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102976
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0090 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1196 - 1208
Published on: Dec 15, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Hydrothermal carbonization,
metals,
microalgae,
nitrogen removal,
organic micropollutants,
wastewater treatment plant
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Valeria Mezzanotte, Francesco Romagnoli, Baiba Ievina, Marco Mantovani, Martina Invernizzi, Elena Ficara, Elena Collina, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article