Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of Massive Online Open Course ‘Energy Transition and Climate Change’ Cover

Development of Massive Online Open Course ‘Energy Transition and Climate Change’

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By: Elina Cervinska,  Andra Blumberga,  Antra Kalnbaļķite and  Jelena Pubule  
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. [1] Serdenciuc N. L. Competency-Based Education – Implications on Teachers’ Training. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012:76:754–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.20010.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.200
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Zelvys R., Akzholova A. Problems of Introducing a Competence Based Learning within the Context of Bologna Process. Pedagogika 2016:121(1):187–189. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2016.1310.15823/p.2016.13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Rieckmann M. Developing competencies for sustainability-driven entrepreneurship in higher education: A literature review on teaching and learning methods. Teor. Educ. 2017:29:129–159.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Fuertes M. A., et al. Climate Change Education: A proposal of a Category-Based Tool for Curriculum: Analysis to Achieve the Climate Competence. Education in the Knowledge Society 2020:21:08. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.2151610.14201/eks.21516
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Sistermans I. J. Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review 2020:21:683–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09658-610.1007/s12564-020-09658-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Voronov M., et al. Effectiveness Research of the New Learning Elements, Initiated by the Change to Competency-Based Education Model in Russia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015:214:758–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.71210.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.712
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Ferrari-Lagos E., et al. Education to mobilize society for Climate Change action. The Climate competence in education. TEEM’19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality 2019:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.336285310.1145/3362789.3362853
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Martínez-Plumed F., Gómez E., Hernańdez-Orallo J. Futures of artificial intelligence through technology readiness levels. Telematics and Informatics 2021:58:101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.10152510.1016/j.tele.2020.101525
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Wong J., Baars M., Koning B. B. Examining the use of prompts to facilitate self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior 2021:115:106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.10659610.1016/j.chb.2020.106596
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Hamzah N., Roosli W. N. A. W., Ismail M. E. The usage of massive open online course (MOOC) in teaching and learning among students. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 2019:7(3):398–404. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.735810.18510/hssr.2019.7358
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Alario-Hoyos C., et al. Proposal for a Conceptual Framework for Educators to Describe and Design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science 2014:20(1):6–23. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-020-01-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Blackmon S. J., Major C. H. Wherefore Art Thou MOOC: Defining Massive Open Online Courses. Online Learning Journal 2017:195–221. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.127210.24059/olj.v21i4.1272
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] García-Martín J., García-Sánchez J. N. The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life. Revista de Psicodidáctica 2020:25(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.00110.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Azevedo J., Marques M. M. MOOC success factors: Proposal of an analysis framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice 2017:16:233–251. https://doi.org/10.28945/386110.28945/3861
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Murugesan R., Nobes A., Wild J. A MOOC approach for training researchers in developing countries. Open Praxis 2017:9(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.47610.5944/openpraxis.9.1.476
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Blanco A. F., García-Peñalvo F. J., Sein-Echaluce M. A methodology proposal for developing Adaptive cMOOC. TEEM ‘13: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality 2013:13:14–15. http://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.253662110.1145/2536536.2536621
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] O’Brien K. L., et al. Metaliteracy as Pedagogical Framework for Learner-Centered Design in Three MOOC Platforms: Connectivist, Coursera and Canvas. Open Praxis 2017:9(3):267–286. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.55310.5944/openpraxis.9.3.553
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Fast-Berglund A., et al. Using the TRL-methodology to design supporting ICT-tools for production operators. Procedia CIRP 2014:17:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.039 Blumberga A., Gravelsins A., Blumberga D. Deliberation platform for energy transition policies: how to make complex things simple. Energies 2022:15(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1501009010.3390/en15010090
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Riga Technical University ORTUS homepage [Online]. [Accessed 27.09.2022]. Available: www.ortus.lv
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Gooyert V., et al. Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2016:111:135–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.01910.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Bolwig S., et al. Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:101:440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.01910.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Gravelsins A., et al. Modelling energy production flexibility: system dynamics approach. Energy Procedia 2018:147:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.06010.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Blumberga, A., et al. Unintended Effects of Energy Efficiency Policy: Lessons Learned in the Residential Sector. Energies 2021:14(22):7792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1422779210.3390/en14227792
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Blumberga, A., et al. The Bright and Dark Sides of Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme: The Case of Latvia. Energies 2021:14(15):4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1415446710.3390/en14154467
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0083 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1106 - 1117
Published on: Nov 25, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Competency-based education,
energy efficiency,
renewable energy sources,
system dynamics
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Elina Cervinska, Andra Blumberga, Antra Kalnbaļķite, Jelena Pubule, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article