Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Development of Massive Online Open Course ‘Energy Transition and Climate Change’

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. [1] Serdenciuc N. L. Competency-Based Education – Implications on Teachers’ Training. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012:76:754–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.20010.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.200
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Zelvys R., Akzholova A. Problems of Introducing a Competence Based Learning within the Context of Bologna Process. Pedagogika 2016:121(1):187–189. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2016.1310.15823/p.2016.13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Rieckmann M. Developing competencies for sustainability-driven entrepreneurship in higher education: A literature review on teaching and learning methods. Teor. Educ. 2017:29:129–159.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Fuertes M. A., et al. Climate Change Education: A proposal of a Category-Based Tool for Curriculum: Analysis to Achieve the Climate Competence. Education in the Knowledge Society 2020:21:08. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.2151610.14201/eks.21516
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Sistermans I. J. Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review 2020:21:683–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09658-610.1007/s12564-020-09658-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Voronov M., et al. Effectiveness Research of the New Learning Elements, Initiated by the Change to Competency-Based Education Model in Russia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015:214:758–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.71210.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.712
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Ferrari-Lagos E., et al. Education to mobilize society for Climate Change action. The Climate competence in education. TEEM’19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality 2019:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.336285310.1145/3362789.3362853
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Martínez-Plumed F., Gómez E., Hernańdez-Orallo J. Futures of artificial intelligence through technology readiness levels. Telematics and Informatics 2021:58:101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.10152510.1016/j.tele.2020.101525
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Wong J., Baars M., Koning B. B. Examining the use of prompts to facilitate self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior 2021:115:106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.10659610.1016/j.chb.2020.106596
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Hamzah N., Roosli W. N. A. W., Ismail M. E. The usage of massive open online course (MOOC) in teaching and learning among students. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 2019:7(3):398–404. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.735810.18510/hssr.2019.7358
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Alario-Hoyos C., et al. Proposal for a Conceptual Framework for Educators to Describe and Design MOOCs. Journal of Universal Computer Science 2014:20(1):6–23. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-020-01-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Blackmon S. J., Major C. H. Wherefore Art Thou MOOC: Defining Massive Open Online Courses. Online Learning Journal 2017:195–221. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.127210.24059/olj.v21i4.1272
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] García-Martín J., García-Sánchez J. N. The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life. Revista de Psicodidáctica 2020:25(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.00110.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Azevedo J., Marques M. M. MOOC success factors: Proposal of an analysis framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice 2017:16:233–251. https://doi.org/10.28945/386110.28945/3861
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Murugesan R., Nobes A., Wild J. A MOOC approach for training researchers in developing countries. Open Praxis 2017:9(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.47610.5944/openpraxis.9.1.476
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Blanco A. F., García-Peñalvo F. J., Sein-Echaluce M. A methodology proposal for developing Adaptive cMOOC. TEEM ‘13: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality 2013:13:14–15. http://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.253662110.1145/2536536.2536621
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] O’Brien K. L., et al. Metaliteracy as Pedagogical Framework for Learner-Centered Design in Three MOOC Platforms: Connectivist, Coursera and Canvas. Open Praxis 2017:9(3):267–286. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.55310.5944/openpraxis.9.3.553
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Fast-Berglund A., et al. Using the TRL-methodology to design supporting ICT-tools for production operators. Procedia CIRP 2014:17:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.039 Blumberga A., Gravelsins A., Blumberga D. Deliberation platform for energy transition policies: how to make complex things simple. Energies 2022:15(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1501009010.3390/en15010090
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Riga Technical University ORTUS homepage [Online]. [Accessed 27.09.2022]. Available: www.ortus.lv
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Gooyert V., et al. Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2016:111:135–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.01910.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Bolwig S., et al. Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:101:440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.01910.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Gravelsins A., et al. Modelling energy production flexibility: system dynamics approach. Energy Procedia 2018:147:503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.06010.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Blumberga, A., et al. Unintended Effects of Energy Efficiency Policy: Lessons Learned in the Residential Sector. Energies 2021:14(22):7792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1422779210.3390/en14227792
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Blumberga, A., et al. The Bright and Dark Sides of Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme: The Case of Latvia. Energies 2021:14(15):4467. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1415446710.3390/en14154467
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0083 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1106 - 1117
Published on: Nov 25, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Competency-based education,
energy efficiency,
renewable energy sources,
system dynamics
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Elina Cervinska, Andra Blumberga, Antra Kalnbaļķite, Jelena Pubule, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article