Differences in Commercialization Policies of Innovations. Customer Perspective
References
- [1] Olefirenko O., Shevliuga O. Commercialization of innovations: Peculiarities of sales policy at innovation active enterprise. Innovative Marketing 2017:13(2):6–12. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.13(2).2017.01
- [2] Dombrovskis V. Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr. 685. Par Zinātnes, tehnoloģijas attīstības un inovācijas pamatnostādnēm 2014.-2020.gadam. (Order of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 685. On the Science, Technology Development and Innovation Guidelines for 2014-2020). Riga, 2013. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.05.2022]. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/263464-par-zinatnes-tehnologijas-attistibas-un-inovacijas-pamatnostadnem-20142020-gadam (In Latvian)
- [3] Rybnicek J. M. Innovation in the United States and Europe. [Online]. [Accessed: May 2, 2022]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3733698
- [4] Commercial excellence: Perfect compound of intuition and facts. 2014. [Onine]. [Accessed: May 2, 2022]. Available: https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/commercial_excellence_20141104.pdf
- [5] Suoniemi S., Terho H., Zablah A., Olkkonen R., Straub D. W. The impact of firm-level and project-level it capabilities on CRM system quality and organizational productivity. Journal of Business Research 2021:127:108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.007
- [6] Herhausen D., Ivens B., Spencer R., Weibel M. Key account management configurations and their effectiveness: A quasi-replication and extension. Industrial Marketing Management 2022:101:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.12.002
- [7] Breznitz D., Cowhey P. America’s Two Systems of Innovation. Innovation for Production in Fostering U.S. Growth. “inov_a_00143”. 2012. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.05.2022]. Available: https://watermark.silverchair.com/inov_a_00143.pdf
- [8] Nevens M., Summe G.L., Uttal B. Commercializing Technology: What the Best Companies Do. Online]. [Accessed: May 2, 2022]. Available: https://hbr.org/1990/05/commercializing-technology-what-the-best-companies-do
- [9] Carayannis E., Grebeniuk A., Meissner D. Smart roadmapping for STI policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2016:110:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.003
- [10] Kowalski A. M. Dynamics and Factors of Innovation Gap Between the European Union and China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2021:12(4):1966–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00699-1
- [11] Losacker S., Liefner I. Implications of China’s innovation policy shift: Does ‘indigenous’ mean closed? Growth and Change 2020:51(3):1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12400
- [12] Langemeyer J., Gómez-Baggethun E., Haase D., Scheuer S., Elmqvist T. Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science and Policy 2016:62:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
- [13] Memari A., Dargi A., Akbari Jokar M. R., Ahmad R., Abdul Rahim A. R. Sustainable supplier selection: A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2019:50:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
- [14] Kumar A. et al. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:69:596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
- [15] Memari A., et al. Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2019:50:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
Language: English
Page range: 1020 - 1031
Published on: Nov 11, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Erlanda Atvare, Edgars Kudurs, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.