Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Impact Assessment of the Renewable Energy Policy Scenarios – a Case Study of Latvia

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. [1] Sen S., Ganguly S. Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development – A discussion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:69:1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.09.137
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Naumann M., Rudolph D. Conceptualizing rural energy transitions: Energizing rural studies, ruralizing energy research. J Rural Stud 2020:73:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2019.12.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Annibaldi V., et al. Renewable Energy Policies: Bibliometric Review and Policy Implications. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):403–417. https://doi.org/10.2478/RTUECT-2020-0112
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Kariuki D. Barriers to Renewable Energy Technologies Development [Online]. [Accessed 05.09.2022]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348936339_Barriers to Renewable Energy Technologies Development
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Moorthy S., et al. Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon 2019:5(1):e01166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E01166
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Broom D. 5 charts show the rapid fall in costs of renewable energy. Energy Post [Online]. [Accessed 05.09.2022]. Available: https://energypost.eu/5-charts-show-the-rapid-fall-in-costs-of-renewable-energy/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Policarp M., et al. SocialRES Energy Innovation Framework: A Comparative Analysis of Existing Business Models for RES Cooperative, Aggregators and Crowdfunders. Proceedings of the 38th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition 2021:1618–1619. https://doi.org/10.4229/EUPVSEC20212021-7DO.5.4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Burke M. J., Stephens J. C. Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Res Soc Sci 2018:35:78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2017.10.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Ameriks U. “Laflora” vēja parks: ceļā uz zaļu industriālo zonu Zemgales reģionā (“Laflora” wind park: on the way to a green industrial zone in the Zemgale region.). Jelgava: Laflora, 2020. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Ruiz Romero S., Colmenar Santos A., Castro Gil M. A. EU plans for renewable energy. An application to the Spanish case. Renew Energy 2012:43:322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2011.11.033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Sunak Y., Madlener R. The impact of wind farm visibility on property values: A spatial difference-in-differences analysis. Energy Econ 2016:55:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2015.12.025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Wang L., et al. Optimization of wind farm layout with complex land divisions. Renew Energy 2017:105:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2016.12.025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Climate Policy Info Hub. Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy [Online]. [Accessed April 20, 2022]. Available: https://climatepolicyinfohub.eu/social-acceptance-renewable-energy.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Richards G., Noble B., Belcher K. Barriers to renewable energy development: A case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan, Canada. Energy Policy 2012:42:691–698.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Leiren M. D., et al. Community Acceptance of Wind Energy Developments: Experience from Wind Energy Scarce Regions in Europe. Sustainability 2020:12(5):12051754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051754
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] The Danish Energy Agency. Technology Data. [Online]. [Accessed April 20, 2022]. Available: https://ens.dk/en/our-services/projections-and-models/technology-data
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Muizniece I., Blumberga D. Wood resources for energy sector in Latvia. Is it a sustainable solution? Energy Procedia 2017:128:287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Santoyo-Castelazo E., Azapagic A. Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Clean Prod 2014:80:119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.05.061
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Väisänen S., et al. Using a multi-method approach for decision-making about a sustainable local distributed energy system: A case study from Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:137:1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.07.173
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Şengül Ü., et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renew Energy 2015:75:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2014.10.045
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Štreimikiene D., Šliogeriene J., Turskis Z. Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania. Renew Energy 2016:85:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2015.06.032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Stein E. W. A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013:22:640–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2013.02.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Blumberga A., Gravelsins A., Blumberga D. Deliberation Platform for Energy Transition Policies: How to Make Complex Things Simple. Energies 2022:15(1):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN15010090
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Pakere I., et al. Will there be the waste heat and boiler house competition in Latvia? Assessment of industrial waste heat. Smart Energy 2021:3:100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEGY.2021.100023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Ozoliņa S. A., et al. Can energy sector reach carbon neutrality with biomass limitations? Energy 2022:249:123797. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.123797
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Kacare M., Pakere I., Gravelsins A. The coupling of the system dynamics model with GIS to visualise the potential of renewable energy. Proceedings of the 24th thematic conference of the Young Scientists Conference “Science - The Future of Lithuania” Environmental Protection Engineering 2020. https://doi.org/10.3846/aainz.2021.12
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Kacare M., et al. Spatial Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25:865–878. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0065
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Tukulis A., et al. Methodology of system dynamic approach for solar energy integration in district heating. Energy Procedia 2018:147:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2018.07.042
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F., Gravelsins A. System dynamics model for natural gas infrastructure with storage facility in Latvia. Energy Procedia 2018:147:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2018.07.070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Rozentale L., et al. System dynamics modelling of railway electrification in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):247–257. https://doi.org/10.2478/RTUECT-2020-0070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Jin Y., et al. Water use of electricity technologies: A global meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:115:109391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109391
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Chatzimouratidis A. I., Pilavachi P. A. Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Energy Policy 2009:37(3):778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Väisänen S., et al. Using a multi-method approach for decision-making about a sustainable local distributed energy system: A case study from Finland. J Clean Prod 2016:137:1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.173
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Štreimikienė D., Šliogerienė J., Turskis Z. Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania, Renew Energy 2015:85:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Mourmouris J. C., Potolias C. A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece. Energy Policy 2012:52:522–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.074
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Mastrocinque E., et al. An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector. Expert Syst Appl 2020:150:113321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113321
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Mwanza M., Ulgen K. Sustainable electricity generation fuel mix analysis using an integration of multicriteria decision-making and system dynamic approach. International Journal of Energy Research 2020:44(12):9560–9585. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5216
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0075 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 998 - 1019
Published on: Nov 5, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Energy communities,
environmental policy planning,
local energy sources,
National Energy and Climate Plan,
system dynamics
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Marika Kacare, Ieva Pakere, Armands Gravelsins, Andra Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article