Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Implications of the FMEA Method in Evaluating Amirkabir Dam’s Environmental Risk

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. [1] McCabe B. Y., et al. Safety performance in the construction industry: Quasi-longitudinal study. J. Constr. Eng. Manage 2017:143:04016113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001260
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Muhlbauer W. K. Pipeline Risk Management Manual. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2004.10.1016/B978-075067579-6/50018-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Fluixá-Sanmartín J., et al. Review article: Climate change impacts on dam safety. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2018:18:2471–2488. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2471-2018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Shameh M. Planning and management of control and reduction of environmental pollutants in the steel industry to achieve safety, health and environment favorable (Case study: Kavian Steel Co.). Ahvaz: Science and Technology Department Ahvaz research, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Vahdani B., Salimi M., Charkhchian M. A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015:77:357–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Ghoushchi S. J., Yousefi S., Khazaeili M. An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Applied Soft Computing 2019:81:105505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105505
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Fouladgar M. M., et al. Risk evaluation of tunneling projects. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2012:12(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Jozi S. A., Shoshtary M. T., Zadeh A. R. K. Environmental risk assessment of dams in construction phase using a multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) method. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. An Int. J. 2015:21(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2013.821905
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Liu H. C., et al. Failure mode and e ect analysis under uncertainty: An integrated multiple criteria decision making approach. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2016:65:1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2016.2570567
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Stamatis D. H. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press, 2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Ravi Sankar N., Prabhu B. S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2001:18(3):324–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710110383737
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Inayat I., et al. Security-Based Safety Hazard Analysis Using FMEA: A DAM Case Study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications 2021:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87101-7_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Haghighifard J., et al. Methodology of Application of EFMEA Method in Assessing Environmental Risks of Dam Structures (Case Study: Jarreh Dam of Ramhormoz). Presented at the International Conference on Science, Engineering and Technologies Environment, Tehran, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Jozi S. A., Seyfosadat S. H. Environmental Risk Assessment of Gotvand Dam in Operation Stage Using the Integrated Method of Preliminary Hazard Analysis and EFMEA Technique. Journal of Environmental Studies 2014:40(1):107– 120. https://doi.org/10.22059/JES.2014.50160
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Darvishi S., et al. Environmental risk assessment of dams at constructional phase using VIKOR and EFMEA methods (Case study: Balarood Dam, Iran). Human and ecological risk assessment: An International Journal 2020:26(4):1087– 1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1558396
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Caldeira L. Risk Analysis Methodologies. Geotechnical Applications. Proceedings of the 2nd Luso-Spanish Geotechnical Conference 2005:31–55. (in Portuguese)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Stamatelatos M., Vesely W. Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications. Washington: NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Baştürk E. Assessing Water Quality of Mamasın Dam, Turkey: Using Water Quality Index Method, Ecological and Health Risk Assessments. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water 2019:47(12):1900251. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201900251
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Bhatti N. B., et al. Impact of small dam’s construction on groundwater quality and level using water quality index (WQI) and GIS: Nagarparkar area of Sindh, Pakistan. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 2020:26(10):2586–2607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1674634
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Hamzaoui F., et al. Risk management in construction projects by coupling the SMACC agent with the MADS MOSAR method–application to the dam project in Mascara, Algeria. International Journal of Construction Management 2019:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1641890
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Fu X., et al. Risk analysis of earth-rock dam failures based on fuzzy event tree method. International journal of environmental research and public health 2018:15(5):886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050886598192529710824
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Hidayah D. N., Latief Y., Riantini L. S. Development of work breakdown structure standard based on risk for safety planning on dam construction work. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2018:420(1):012003.10.1088/1757-899X/420/1/012003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Song Z., et al. Assessment of sediment impact on the risk of river diversion during dam construction: A simulation-based project study on the Jing River, China. Water 2018:10(2):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020217
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Wang W., et al. Dam construction in Lancang-Mekong River Basin could mitigate future flood risk from warming-induced intensified rainfall. Geophysical Research Letters 2017:44(20):10.378–10.386. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Soltani K., et al. Estimates of Evaporation from Reservoirs Using ANN Model, a Case Study of Amirkabir Dam, Karaj City, Iran. International Journal of Systems Science and Applied Mathematics 2016:1(1):1–7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Musolas A., Egozcue J., Crusells-Girona M. Vulnerability models for environmental risk assessment. Application to a nuclear power plant containment building. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2015:30(8):2287– 2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1179-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Oldenhof M. T., et al. Consistency of FMEA used in the validation of analytical procedures. J Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011:54(3):592–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.09.02420970277
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Roszak M., Spilka M., Kania A. Environmental failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) – a new approach to methodology. Journal of Metallurgy 2015:54(2):449–451
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0074 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 982 - 997
Published on: Nov 5, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Amirkabir dam,
environmental risk,
FMEA method,
risk priority number,
severity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Yousef Kassem, Hüseyin Gökçekuş, Anoosheh Iravanian, Mehrdad Nategh, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article