Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Analysis of Shared Electric Scooter Use in Riga

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. [1] Machado C. A. S., de S. Hue N. P. M., Berssaneti F. T., Quintanilha J. A. An overview of shared mobility. Sustainability 2018:10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124342
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] EMAF. Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive europe. 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] CB Insights. The Micromobility Revolution : How Bikes And Scooters Are Shaking Up Urban Transport Worldwide. 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] National Association of City Transportation Officials, ‘Shared Micromobility in 2018. 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Hosseinzadeh A., Algomaiah M., Kluger R., Li Z. E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021:66:102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] European Environment Agency. Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in Europe. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed: 11.04.2022]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] EIT Urban Mobility. Guideline of best practices, and results of e-micromobile integration potentials. Stockholm, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Bieliński T., Ważna A. Electric scooter sharing and bike sharing user behaviour and characteristics. Sustainability 2020:12(22):9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229640
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Number of Inhabitants by gender in Latvia 2014–2021. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed: 11.04.2022]. Available: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRD/IRD060/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Latvijas Vides, Ģeologijas un Meteoroloģijas Centrs. Latvijas klimats. (Latvian Environment Geology and Meteorology Agency. Climate of Latvia). [Online]. [Accessed: 11-Apr-2022]. Available: https://videscentrs.lvgmc.lv/lapas/latvijas-klimats (In Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Rīgas dome. Rīgas ilgtspējīgas enerģētikas un klimata rīcības plāns. (Riga City Council. Riga sustainable energy and climate action plan). 2022. (in Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Rīgas Satiksme, ‘Annual Accounts of Riga Satiksme for year 2021,’ Riga, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Nikel D. City of Oslo Cracks Down on Electric Scooter Rentals. Life in Norway. Life in Norway. [Online]. [Accessed: 10.09.2021]. Available: https://www.lifeinnorway.net/oslo-electric-scooter-rental-crackdown/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Declaration of an emergency situation is in Latvia. Riga, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Kinca A. Latvijas Sabiedriskie Mediji. The results of the police raid: all the scooter riders checked at night had been under influence. (Policijas reida rezultāti: visi naktī pārbaudītie skrejriteņu braucēji – reibumā) 2021. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.07.2022]. Available: https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/policijas-reida-rezultati-visi-naktiparbauditie-skrejritenu-brauceji-reibuma.a463854/ (in Latvian).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Noland R. B. Trip patterns and revenue of shared e-scooters in Louisville, Kentucky. Findings, April 2019. https://doi.org/10.32866/7747
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Jiao J., Bai S. Understanding the shared e-scooter travels in Austin, TX. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 2020:9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020135
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Mathew J. K., Liu M., Seeder S., Li H., Bullock D. M. Analysis of E-scooter trips and their temporal usage patterns. Institute Transp. Eng. 2019:89(6):45–49.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] McKenzie G. Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington. D. C. Journal of Transport Geography 2019:78:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] McKenzie G. Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2019:79:101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] New regulation for electric scooters. Latvijas Vēstnesis Riga, 25-Mar-2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0070 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 930 - 940
Published on: Oct 28, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
CO emissions,
dockless e-scooter,
micromobility,
urban transport
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Aivars Rubenis, Armands Celms, Aivars Ratkevičs, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article