Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Non-Incomes Risk Mitigation Mechanisms for Cultural Heritage: Role of Insurances Facing Covid-19 in the Italian Context

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. [1] Morandi Da Silva A. G., Feres J. G. Environment and insurance. November, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Gizzi F., Porrini D., De Masi F. Building a Natural Hazard Insurance System (NHIS): The Long-Lasting Italian Case. Sustainability 2021:13(21):12269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13211226910.3390/su132112269
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Pagano A. J., Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F. The relationship between insurance companies and natural disaster risk reduction: overview of the key characteristics and mechanisms dealing with climate change. Energy Procedia 2018:147:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.07210.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.072
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Croce G. Le politiche attive del lavoro nella crisi da Covid-19 (Active labor policies in the Covid-19 crisis.). Econ. Lav. 2020:54(2):91–116. https://doi.org/10.7384/98577 (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Pagano A. J., Romagnoli F., Vannucci E. COVID-19 Effects on Cultural Heritage: The Case of Villa Adriana and Villa D’Este. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-009410.2478/rtuect-2021-0094
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Agostino D., Arnaboldi M., Lampis A. Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness. Museum Manag. Curatorsh. 2020:35(4):362–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2020.179002910.1080/09647775.2020.1790029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] ANIA. Associazione Nazionale tra le Imprese Assicuratrici. Italian insurance 2016–2017. Rome: ANIA, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Munasinghe M., Clarke C. Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development-Economic and Policy Issues. Washington: WBG., 1994.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Civil Protection Department. Emergency planning and damage scenarios [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2021]. Available: https://rischi.protezionecivile.gov.it/en/seismic/activities/emergency-planning-and-damage-scenarios
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Ministry of the Interior. Plan ORSEC et Plans Particuliers d’Intervention (ORSEC Plan and Specific Intervention Plans) [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2021]. Available: https://www.gouvernement.fr/risques/dispositif-orsec (in French)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Bedate A., Herrero L. C., Sanz J. Á. Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain. J. Cult. Herit. 2004:5(1):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2003.04.00210.1016/j.culher.2003.04.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] NIBS. HAZUS: Hazards U.S.: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. NIBS Doc. N. 5200. Washington: HAZUS, 1997.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Gazzetta Ufficiale. OPCM 3431/2003 – Ulteriori modifiche ed integrazioni all’O.P.C.M. 20 marzo 2003 n. 3274, recante «Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica (Further changes and additions to the O.P.C.M. March 20, 2003 n. 3274, containing ‘First elements regarding general criteria for the seismic classification of the national territory and technical regulations for constructions in seismic areas.). Rome: Ministry of Economy and Finances, 2003. (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Łasut A. Insurance as a means of reducing economic losses due to floods. Proceedings of the Int. Conference Towards natural flood reduction strategies 2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Thomas A., Leichenko R. Adaptation through insurance: Lessons from the NFIP. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2011:3(3):250–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/1756869111115340110.1108/17568691111153401
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Miller B., Dixon L., Clancy N. Reasonable and Risk-Based? Replacing NFIP Generally Subsidized Rates with a Means-Tested Subsidy: Replacing NFIP Generally Subsidized Rates. South. Econ. J. 2019:85(4):1180–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.1232910.1002/soej.12329
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Federal Emergency Management Agency. National Flood Insurance Program Regulations. Hyattsville: FEMA, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Appiotti F., et al. Definition of a Risk Assessment Model within a European Interoperable Database Platform (EID) for Cultural Heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2020:46:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.00110.1016/j.culher.2020.08.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Severini G. L’immateriale economico nei beni culturali (The economic immaterial in cultural heritage.). Aedon 2015:3. (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Bottero M., Datola G., de Angelis E. A system dynamics model and analytic network process: An integrated approach to investigate urban resilience. Land 2020:9(8):24–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND908024210.3390/land9080242
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Guccio C., et al. Technology and Public Access to Cultural Heritage: The Italian Experience on ICT for Public Historical Archives. 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-29544-2_4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Bellè B. M. Promesse e fallimenti nella valorizzazione degli immobili pubblici. Sci. Reg. 2017:16(3):463–472. https://doi.org/10.14650/87465
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Istituto Guglielmo Tagliacarne. Il sistema economico integrato dei beni culturali (The integrated economic system of cultural heritage.). Rome: Istituto Guglielmo Tagliacarne, 2009. (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Antonelli A. La valorizzazione del patrimonio mobiliare dello stato e degli enti locali (The enhancement of the movable assets of the state and local authorities.). Pisa: Universita di Pisa, 2017. (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Emiliani A. Per un nuovo concetto di bene culturale. Capitale Cult. 2020:21:463–467. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/2338
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Bottero M., Datola G., Monaco R. Fuzzy cognitive maps: A dynamic approach for urban regeneration processes evaluation. Valori e Valutazioni 2019:2019(23):77–90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. L’Italia dei musei (The Italy of museums.). Rome: ISTAT, 2019. (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Cherchi A. I musei statali valgono 27 miliardi di euro (l’1,6% del Pil italiano) (State museums are worth 27 billion euros (1.6% of the Italian GDP).). IL Sole 24 Ore [Online]. [Accessed 19.12.2021]. Available: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/i-musei-statali-valgono-27-miliardi-euro-l-16percento-pil-italiano-ACMvVjp (in Italian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Parker R. S. Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development. Washington: World Bank Publications, 2006.10.1596/978-0-8213-6650-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Hallegatte S., Przyluski V. The economics of natural disasters. CESifo Forum 2010:11(2):14–24. https://doi.org/10.4337/978178536598010.4337/9781785365980
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. Mappa dei rischi dei comuni italiani. (National Institute of Statistics. Risk map of Italian municipalities). [Online]. [Accessed 12.02.2022]. Available: https://www.istat.it/it/mappa-rischi
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Drdácký M., et al. Protecting the cultural heritage from natural disasters. Brussels: The European Parliament, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] De Masi F., Porrini D. Cultural Heritage and natural disasters: the insurance choice of the Italian Cathedrals. J. Cult. Econ. 2021:45:409–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09397-x10.1007/s10824-020-09397-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Abraham K. S. Efficiency and Fairness in Insurance Risk Classification. J. Storage 1985:71(3):403–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/107296310.2307/1072963
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Blanco E., Dutcher E. G., Haller T. Social dilemmas with public and private insurance against losses. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2019:180:924–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.00810.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Polzin F., et al. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy? A systematic review with an investor perspective. Appl. Energy 2018:236:1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.09810.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Maio R., Ferreira T. M., Vicente R. A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018:27:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.01010.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Xing J., et al. Detection and reconstruction of catastrophic breaks of high-frequency financial data with local linear scaling approximation. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2020:561:124121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.12412110.1016/j.physa.2019.124121
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F. Assessment of Urban Resilience to Natural Disasters with a System Dynamics Tool: Case Study of Latvian Municipality. Environmental & Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):249–264. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-010110.2478/rtuect-2020-0101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Fagioli F. F., Paolotti L., Boggia A. Trends in Environmental Management Systems Research. A Content Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-000510.2478/rtuect-2022-0005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Bellieri dei Belliera A., et al. Flood risk insurance: the Blockchain approach to a Bayesian adaptive design of the contract. Colloquium 2019 ‘Innovating Actuarial Research on Financial Risk and ERM’ 2019:1–15.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0066 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 871 - 882
Published on: Oct 11, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Biological and natural hazards,
Covid-19,
cultural heritages,
risk mitigation,
risk and resilience,
insurance
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Andrea Jonathan Pagano, Francesco Romagnoli, Emanuele Vannucci, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article