Have a personal or library account? Click to login

When Reed Application is Sustainable

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. [1] Latvijas Dabas fonds, et al. Inovatīvi tehnoloģiskie risinājumi niedru biomasas izmantošanai un to efektivitātes novērtējums (Innovative technological solutions for the use of reed biomass and their efficiency assessment.). Riga: RTU IESE, 2018. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bulut I. Floating islands of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011:19:526–531. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.16510.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.165
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Muizniece I., et al. Evaluation of reed biomass use for manufacturing products, taking into account environmental protection requirements. Agronomy Research 2018:16(1):1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.18.077
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Čubars E. Niedru produktivitāti un biomasas īpašības ietekmējošo faktoru izpēte un to izmantošanas enerģijas ieguvei pamatojums (Study of the factors affecting the productivity and biomass properties of reeds and the justification of their use for energy production). Rezekne Academy of Technologies, 2014. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Croon F. W. Saving reed lands by giving economic value to reed. Mires and Peat 2013:13:10.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Srivastava J., Kalra S. J. S., Naraian R. Environmental perspectives of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex. Steudel. Applied Water Science 2014:4(3):193–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0142-x10.1007/s13201-013-0142-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] van der Sluis T., et al. Reed harvesting from wetlands for bioenergy Technical aspects, sustainability and economic viability of reed harvesting in Ukraine. Wageningen: Alterra Wageningen, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Köbbing J. F., Thevs N., Zerbe S. The utilisation of reed (Phragmites australis): a review. Mires and Peat 2013:13:2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Komulainen M., et al. Reed energy possibilities of using the Common Reed for energy generation in Southern Finland. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Allirand J.-M., Gosse G. An above-ground biomass production model for a common reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) stand. Biomass and Bioenergy 1995:9(6):441–448.10.1016/0961-9534(95)00042-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Björndahl G. Influence of winter harvest on stand structure and biomass production of the common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) trin. ex steud. in Lake Tåkern, Southern Sweden. 1985:7(4):303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(85)90069-110.1016/0144-4565(85)90069-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Barz M., et al. Utilisation of common reed as an energy source. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference & Exhibition 2007. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2824.4485
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Andersen L. H., et al. Can reed harvest be used as a management strategy for improving invertebrate biomass and diversity? Journal of Environmental Management 2021:300:113637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11363710.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11363734521006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Engloner A. I. Structure, growth dynamics and biomass of reed (Phragmites australis) - A review. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 2009:204(5):331–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2008.05.00110.1016/j.flora.2008.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Valkama E., Lyytinen S., Koricheva J. The impact of reed management on wildlife: A meta-analytical review of European studies. Biological Conservation 2008:141(2):364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.00610.1016/j.biocon.2007.11.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Shay J. M., et al. Changes in Shoreline Vegetation Over a 50-Year Period in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba in Response to Water Levels. Wetlands 1999:19:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0316177310.1007/BF03161773
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] National Plant Services. Plant Conservation Alliance. Fact Sheet: Giant Reed. May 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] New York Invasive Species Information. Common Reed. 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 13.05.2022]. Available: https://nyis.info/invasive_species/common-reed/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative. About Phragmites Adaptive Management Framework [Online]. [Accessed 13.05.2022]. Available: https://www.greatlakesphragmites.net/pamf/about-pamf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Great Lakes Phragmites Collaborative. Phragmites Life Cycle [Online]. [Accessed 13.05.2022]. Available: https://www.greatlakesphragmites.net/phragbasics/life-cycle
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Jahan A., Bahraminasab M., Edwards K. L. A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Materials and Design 2012:35:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.00510.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Jahan A., Edwards K. L., Bahraminasab M. Multi-criteria decision-making for materials selection. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design. Elsevier, 2016:63–80.10.1016/B978-0-08-100536-1.00004-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Zlaugotne B., et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):454–471. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028.10.2478/rtuect-2020-0028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. Edition 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Goepel K. Implementation of an Online software tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2018:10(3):469–487. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.59010.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] European Commision. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015. 2013. [Online]. [Accessed dd.mm.yyyy]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/international-
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Pichery C. Sensitivity Analysis. Encyclopedia of Toxicology. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Academic Press, 2014:236–237.10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00431-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Saltelli A. Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment. Risk Analysis 2002:22(3):579–590.10.1111/0272-4332.0004012088235
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] European Commision. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Regensburg: EuroParc Federation, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0053 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 697 - 707
Published on: Sep 2, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Biomass,
multi-criteria analysis,
reed,
sustainability,
TOPSIS
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Alise Anna Stipniece-Jekimova, Erika Teirumnieka, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article