What are the Linkages between Climate and Economy? Bibliometric Analysis
By:
References
- [1] OECD. Towards Quantifying the Links Between Environment and Economic Growth. 2016 [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2022]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/global-forum-on-environment-2016.htm
- [2] Huang C., et al. Estimating economic impacts from future energy demand changes due to climate change and economic development in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021:311:127576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12757610.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127576
- [3] Dell M., Jones B. F., Olken B. A. What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J. Econ. Lit. 2014:52(3):740–798. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.3.74010.1257/jel.52.3.740
- [4] Kalkuhl M., Wenz L. The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2020:103:102360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.10236010.1016/j.jeem.2020.102360
- [5] Andersson M., Baccianti C., Morgan J. Occasional Paper Series. Climate change and the macro economy. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2020.10.2139/ssrn.3632832
- [6] Bowen A., Cochrane S., Fankhauser S. Climate change, adaptation and economic growth. Clim. Change 2012:113(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0346-810.1007/s10584-011-0346-8
- [7] Tachiiri K., Su X., Matsumoto K. Identifying key processes and sectors in the interaction between climate and socioeconomic systems: a review toward integrating Earth–human systems. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2021:8(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00418-710.1186/s40645-021-00418-7
- [8] Budolfson M., et al. Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2021:11(12):1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01217-010.1038/s41558-021-01217-0
- [9] Rhodes E., et al. Understanding climate policy projections: A scoping review of energy-economy models in Canada. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022:153:111739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.11173910.1016/j.rser.2021.111739
- [10] Bali Swain R., Ranganathan S. Modeling interlinkages between sustainable development goals using network analysis. World Dev. 2021:138:105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.10513610.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105136
- [11] Caglar A. E., et al. Determinants of CO2 emissions in the BRICS economies: The role of partnerships investment in energy and economic complexity. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 2022:4:101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.10190710.1016/j.seta.2021.101907
- [12] Ciarli T., Savona M. Modelling the Evolution of Economic Structure and Climate Change: A Review. Ecol. Econ. 2019:158:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.00810.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.008
- [13] Cantele M., et al. Equilibrium Modeling for Environmental Science: Exploring the Nexus of Economic Systems and Environmental Change. Earth’s Future 2021:9(9):e2020EF001923. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF00192310.1029/2020EF001923
- [14] Golombek, R., et al. The role of transmission and energy storage in European decarbonization towards 2050. Energy 2022:239(C):122159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.12215910.1016/j.energy.2021.122159
- [15] Frischsenteret. LIBEMOD [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2022]. Available: https://www.frisch.uio.no/ressurser/LIBEMOD/
- [16] HM Revenue & customs. HMRC’s CGE model documentation. London: HM Revenue & Customs, 2013.
- [17] The World Bank Group. Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Models [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2022]. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00519/WEB/OTHER/TOOLS-37.HTM
- [18] Freire-González J., Ho M. S. Policy strategies to tackle rebound effects : A comparative analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2022:193:107332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.10733210.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107332
- [19] Babiker M. H. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J. Int. Econ. 2005:65(2):421–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.00310.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.003
- [20] Fragkos P., et al. Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union. Energy 2021:237:121591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.12159110.1016/j.energy.2021.121591
- [21] European Commission. GEM-E3 model [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2022]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/potencia/jrc-idees
- [22] OECD. The OECD ENV-linkages modelling framework. Projecting economy-environment interactions in the coming decades. Paris: OECD, 2013.
- [23] OECD. Introducing land use in OECD’s ENV-Linkages model. Paris: OECD, 2011.
- [24] Potsdam institute for climate impact research. REMIND model [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2022]. Available: https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/institute/departments/transformation-pathways/models/remind
- [25] Ueckerdt F., et al. Decarbonizing global power supply under region-specific consideration of challenges and options of integrating variable renewables in the REMIND model. Energy Economics 2017:64:665–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.01210.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.012
- [26] Dereli T., et al. Industrial applications of type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: A concise review. Comput. Ind. 2011:62(2):125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.00610.1016/j.compind.2010.10.006
- [27] Zhang F., Zhang H. Bibliometric analysis of research trends on acupuncture for neck pain treatment over the past 20 years. J. Pain Res. 2021:14:3207–3221. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S34628410.2147/JPR.S346284859488834803398
- [28] Dzikevics M., Jaunzems D., Terauds M. Bibliometric Analysis of the Solar Thermal System Control Methods. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-008410.2478/rtuect-2021-0084
- [29] Rao T., Mustapa S. I. A review of climate economic models in Malaysia. Sustain. 2021:13(1):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1301032510.3390/su13010325
- [30] Doukas H., Nikas A. Decision support models in climate policy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020:280(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.01710.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.017
- [31] Nikas A., et al. Coupling circularity performance and climate action: From disciplinary silos to transdisciplinary modelling science. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022:30:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.01110.1016/j.spc.2021.12.011
- [32] Wang Y., et al. Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China: Goals, implementation path and prospects. China Geol. 2021:4:720–746. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg202108310.31035/cg2021083
- [33] Antimiani A., Costantini V., Paglialunga E. The sensitivity of climate-economy CGE models to energy-related elasticity parameters: Implications for climate policy design. Econ. Model. 2015:51:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.07.01510.1016/j.econmod.2015.07.015
- [34] Tang B. J., Wang X. Y., Wei Y. M. Quantities versus prices for best social welfare in carbon reduction: A literature review. Appl. Energy 2018:233–234:554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.01810.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.018
- [35] Kikstra J. S., et al. The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021:16(9):0940337. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b10.1088/1748-9326/ac1d0b
Language: English
Page range: 616 - 629
Published on: Aug 17, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Kristiana Dolge, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.