Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Towards Climate Neutrality via Sustainable Agriculture in Soil Management

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. [1] Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, The European Green Deal. COM/2019/640 final. Brussels: EC, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. COM/2020/381 final. Brussels: EC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] COM (2020) 80 final, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). Brussels: EC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] COM (2020) 98 final, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A new Circular Economy Action Plan. Brussels: EC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Buzkova R. Own Resources in the Light of European Council Conclusions on the MFF and Next Generation EU. Financial Law Review 2020:20(4):22–34. https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.20.018.13090
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EU) 2018/842 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement. Brussels: EC, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulations (EU) 2018/841 as regards the scope, simplifying the compliance rules, setting out the targets of the Member States for 2030 and committing to the collective achievement of climate neutrality by 2035 in the land use, forestry and agriculture sector, and (EU) 2018/1999 as regards improvement in monitoring, reporting, tracking of progress and review. Brussels: EC, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Analysis of links between CAP Reform and Green Deal. Brussels: EC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 2009:L 140/16.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. Official Journal of the European Union 2018:L 328/210.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] European Commission. EU Agriculture in Numbers: Performance on the nine specific objectives of the CAP. Brussels, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Eurostat/Eurostat database [Online]. [Accessed 15 March 2022]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] United Nations Climate Change. Estonia Fourth Biennial Report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Charlotte: UNCC, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] United Nations Climate Change. Latvian Fourth Biennial Report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Charlotte: UNCC, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] United Nations Climate Change. Lithuania Fourth Biennial Report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Charlotte: UNCC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] United Nations Climate Change. FCCC/TRR.4/EST. Report on the technical review of the fourth biennial report of Estonia. Charlotte: UNCC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] United Nations Climate Change. FCCC/TRR.4/LVA. Report on the technical review of the fourth biennial report of Latvia. Charlotte: UNCC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] United Nations Climate Change. FCCC/TRR.4/LTU. Report on the technical review of the fourth biennial report of Lithuania. Charlotte: UNCC, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO database [Online]. [Accessed 15 March 2022]. Available: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Gaurav N., et al. Utilisation of bioresources for sustainable biofuels: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:73:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Brazdausks P., et al. Evaluation of cellulose content in hemp shives after salt catalyzed hydrolysis. Energy Procedia 2017:128:297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.316
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Pubule J., et al. Analysis of the environmental impact assessment of power energy projects in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality 2012:23(2):190–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204930
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Hayes R. C., et al. Perennial cereal crops: An initial evaluation of wheat derivatives. Field Crops Research 2012:133:68–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Marti A., et al. Structural characterisation of proteins in wheat flour doughs enriched with intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) flour. Food Chemistry 2016:194:994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.08226471645
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Monforti F., et al. Optimal energy use of agricultural crop residues preserving soil organic carbon stocks in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015:44:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Monti M., et al. Cereal/grain legume intercropping in rotation with durum wheat in crop/livestock production systems for the Mediterranean farming system. Field Crops Research 2019:240:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.05.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Chuang Y.-S., et al. Fermentative bioenergy production from distillers grains using mixed microflora. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012:37(20):15547–15555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] United Nations Climate Change. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, Decision 2/CP.17: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. Charlotte: UNCC, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Opricovics S., Tzeng G. H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 2004:156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Stocker T. F., et al. Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers, Technical Summary and Frequently Asked Questions. Geneva: IPCC, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] German R., et al. Agricultural climate mitigation policies and measures. ETC/CME Eionet Report/6/2021. Boeretang: European Topic Centre on Climate, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Ahmed J., et al. Agriculture and climate change. Reducing emissions through improved farming practices. Stockholm: McKinsey & Company, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Popluga D., Kreišmane Dz. SEG emisijas samazinoši pasākumi (Measures to reduce GHG emissions). 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 5 March 2022]. Available: https://www.llu.lv/lv/seg-emisijas-samazinosi-pasakumi (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Muñoz R., et al. Estimation of the lifespan of agricultural tractors using a diffusion model at the aggregate level. Ciencia e investigación agrarian 2012:39(3):557–562. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202012000300014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Jiafa Luo et al. Nitrous oxide and greenhouse gas emissions from grazed pastures as affected by the use of nitrification inhibitor and restricted grazing regime. Science of the Total Environment 2013:465:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.07523374420
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Pedro Pellegrini et al. Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018:115(10):2335–2340. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717072115587798729463755
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Kanter D., Zhang X., Mauzerall D. L. Reducing Nitrogen Pollution while Decreasing Farmers’ Costs and Increasing Fertilizer Industry Profits. Journal of Environmental Quality 2015:44(2):325–335. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.04.017326023952
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. Latvijas lauksaimniecības siltumnīcefekta gāzu un amonjaka emisiju, kā arī CO2 piesaistes (aramzemēs un zālājos) robežsamazinājuma izmaksu līkņu (MACC) pielāgošana izmantošanai lauksaimniecības, vides un klimata politikas veidošanā (Adaptation of Latvia’s greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions as well as CO2 capture (arable land and grasslands) marginal cost reduction curves (MACC) for use in agricultural, environmental and climate policy-making.). Jelgava: LLU, 2019. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] MacLeod M., et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures for Agriculture: A Literature Review. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015:89. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrvvkq900vj-en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Hoglund-Isaksson L., et al. EU low carbon roadmap 2050: Potentials and costs for mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Strategy Reviews 2012:1(2):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2012.05.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Bumbiere K., et al. Ranking of Bioresources for Biogas Production. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):368–377. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] De Cara S., Jayet P.-A. Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture, cost-effectiveness, and the EU non-ETS Burden Sharing Agreement. Ecological Economics 2010:70(9):1680–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 535 - 547
Published on: Aug 8, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Agricultural soils,
cereals,
GHG emissions,
grain,
high value-added products,
mitigation measures
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Agita Gancone, Ruta Viznere, Daina Kaleja, Jelena Pubule, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article