Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Assessments under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. [1] Srivastava A. Standardizing evaluation process: Necessary for achieving SDGs – A case study of India. Eval. Program Plann. 2018:69:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.00110.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.05.00129777879
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Banerjee O., Cicowiez M., Horridge M., Vargas R. Evaluating synergies and trade-offs in achieving the SDGs of zero hunger and clean water and sanitation: An application of the IEEM Platform to Guatemala. Ecol. Econ. 2019:161:280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.00310.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Phillips J. The application of the Geocybernetic Assessment Matrix to the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020:23:7550–7572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00932-610.1007/s10668-020-00932-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Londoño A., Cruz J. G. Evaluation of sustainable development in the sub-regions of Antioquia (Colombia) using multicriteria composite indices: A tool for prioritizing public investment at the subnational level. Environ. Dev. 2019:32:100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.05.00110.1016/j.envdev.2019.05.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] El-Maghrabi M. H., Gable S., Osorio-Rodarte I., Verbeek J. Sustainable Development Goals Diagnostics: An Application of Network Theory and Complexity Measures to Set Country Priorities. Working Paper; No. 8481. World Bank 2018. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-848110.1596/1813-9450-8481
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll C., Teksoz K., Durand-Delacre D., Sachs J. D. National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nat. Geosci. 2017:10(8):547–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo298510.1038/ngeo2985
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Allen C., Reid M., Thwaites J., Glover R., Kestin T. Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia. Sustain. Sci. 2020:15(2):521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Schuschny A., Soto H. Guía metodológica: diseño de indicadores compuestos de desarrollo sostenible. (Methodological guide: design of composite indicators of sustainable development). Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas. CEPAL, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Londoño A. Metodología y evaluación del desarrollo sostenible de las subregiones que integran el departamento de Antioquia (Colombia), bajo un enfoque sistémico inter-temático y multicriterio. (Methodology and evaluation of the sustainable development of the subregions that make up the department of Antioquia (Colombia), under an inter-thematic and multi-criteria systemic approach). Universidad de Manizales, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Abou-Ali H., Abdelfattah Y. M. Integrated paradigm for sustainable development: A panel data study. Econ. Model. 2013:30(1):334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.01610.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Giddings B., Hopwood B., O’Brien G. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2002:10(4):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.19910.1002/sd.199
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Holden E., Linnerud K., Banister D. Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014:26(1):130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.00610.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Biggeri M., Clark D. A., Ferrannini A., Mauro V. Tracking the SDGs in an ‘integrated’ manner: A proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals. World Dev. 2019:122:628–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.02210.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Ali-Toudert F., Ji L. Modeling and measuring urban sustainability in multi-criteria based systems – A challenging issue. Ecol. Indic. 2017:73:597–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.04610.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.046
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Sepúlveda S. Metodología para estimar el nivel de desarrollo sostenible de territorios: Biograma 2008. (Methodology to estimate the level of sustainable development of territories: Biograma 2008). San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA), 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Miola A., Schiltz F. Measuring sustainable development goals performance: How to monitor policy action in the 2030 Agenda implementation? Ecol. Econ. 2019:164:106373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.10637310.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106373668620631582878
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Hickel J. The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecol. Econ. 2020:167:106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.01110.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Da Silva J., Fernandes V., Limont M., Rauen W. Sustainable development assessment from a capitals perspective: Analytical structure and indicator selection criteria. J. Environ. Manage. 2020:260:110147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11014710.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11014732090839
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Ambrogui R. Desarrollo Sostenible: Concepto y Evolución del Paradigma. (Sustainable development: Concept and paradigm evolution). 2017:5(9):110–125. https://doi.org/10.5377/reice.v5i9.436610.5377/reice.v5i9.4366
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Hansson S. O. Technology and the notion of sustainability. Technol. Soc. 2010:32(4):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.00310.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Álvarez-Hincapié C. F. Capital natural crítico y función de hábitat como aproximación a la complejidad ambiental. (Critical natural capital and habitat function as an approach to environmental complexity). Rev. Lasallista Investig. 2010:7(2):132–149.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Gallopín G. Los indicadores de desarrollo sostenible: aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. (Indicators of sustainable development: conceptual and methodological aspects). 2006.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Von Stechow C. et al. 2 °C and SDGs: United they stand, divided they fall? Environ. Res. Lett. 2016:11(3):034022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/03402210.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Zhi L. et al. Pyrolyzed biowastes deactivated potentially toxic metals and eliminated antibiotic resistant genes for healthy vegetable production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020:276:124208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12420810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124208750201132982076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Kok B. et al. Fish as feed: Using economic allocation to quantify the Fish In: Fish Out ratio of major fed aquaculture species. Aquaculture 2020:528:735474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.73547410.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735474
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Ahner-McHaffie T. W., Guest G., Petruney T., Eterno A., Dooley B. Evaluating the impact of integrated development: are we asking the right questions? A systematic review. Gates Open Res. 2018:1–6. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12755.210.12688/gatesopenres.12755.2603409829984355
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Asi Y. M., Williams C. The role of digital health in making progress toward Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 in conflict-affected populations. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2018:114:114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.00310.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.00329126701
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Vanham D. et al. Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: An evaluation of indicator 6.4.2, Level of water stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2018:613–614:218–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.05610.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.056568170728915458
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Nam Chol O., Kim H. Towards the 2 °C goal: Achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 in DPR Korea,’ Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019:150:104412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10441210.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104412
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Gennari P., D’Orazio M. A statistical approach for assessing progress towards the SDG targets. Stat. J. IAOS 2020:36:1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-20068810.3233/SJI-200688
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] El Mohadab M., Bouikhalene B., Safi S. Bibliometric method for mapping the state of the art of scientific production in Covid-19. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2020:139:110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.11005210.1016/j.chaos.2020.110052732435232834606
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Brooks T. M. et al. Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi Targets and Sustainable Development Goals. Biodiversity 2015:16(2–3:)157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2015.107590310.1080/14888386.2015.1075903
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Meuleman L., Niestroy I. Common But Differentiated Governance: A Metagovernance Approach to Make the SDGs Work. Sustainability 2015:7(9):12295–12321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7091229510.3390/su70912295
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] United Nations, Global Sustainable Development Report: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Omisore A. G. Attaining Sustainable Development Goals in sub-Saharan Africa; the need to address environmental challenges. Environ. Dev. 2018:25:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.09.00210.1016/j.envdev.2017.09.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Wiedmann T., Lenzen M. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nat. Geosci. 2018:11(5):314–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0113-910.1038/s41561-018-0113-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Watts N. et al. The Lancet Countdown: tracking progress on health and climate change. Lancet 2017:389(10074):1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32124-910.1016/S0140-6736(16)32124-927856085
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Xue L. et al. Missing Food, Missing Data? A Critical Review of Global Food Losses and Food Waste Data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017:51(12):6618–6633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b0040110.1021/acs.est.7b0040128492315
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Lozano R. et al. Measuring progress from 1990 to 2017 and projecting attainment to 2030 of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals for 195 countries and territories: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018:392(10159):2091–2138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32281-510.1016/S0140-6736(18)32281-5622791130496107
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] McCollum D. L. et al. Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018:13:033006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe310.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Niessen L. W. et al. Tackling socioeconomic inequalities and non-communicable diseases in low-income and middleincome countries under the sustainable development agenda. Lancet 2018:391(10134):2036–2046. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30482-310.1016/S0140-6736(18)30482-329627160
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Spangenberg J. H. Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustain. Dev. 2017:25(4):311–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.165710.1002/sd.1657
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Mills G. et al. Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018:24(8):3560–3574. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.1415710.1111/gcb.1415729604158
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Mancini L., Sala S. Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resour. Policy 2018:57:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.00210.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Delanka-Pedige H. M. K., Munasinghe-Arachchige S. P., Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige I. S. A., Nirmalakhandan N. Wastewater infrastructure for sustainable cities: assessment based on UN sustainable development goals (SDGs). Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2020:28(3):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.179500610.1080/13504509.2020.1795006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Delanka-Pedige H. M. K., Munasinghe-Arachchige S. P., Isuru S. A., Zhang Y., Nirmalakhandan N. Algal pathway towards meeting United Nation’s sustainable development goal 6. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2020:27(8):678–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.175697710.1080/13504509.2020.1756977
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Munasinghe-Arachchige S. P., Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige I. S. A., Delanka-Pedige H. M. K., Nirmalakhandan N. Sewage treatment process refinement and intensification using multi-criteria decision making approach: A case study. J. Water Process Eng. 2020:37:101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10148510.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101485
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Chen J., Zhou D., Zhao Y., Wu B., Wu T. Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions of bike sharing in China: Production, operation, and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020:162:105011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10501110.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Jolliet O. et al. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018:23:2189–2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Trinder J., Liu Q. Assessing environmental impacts of urban growth using remote sensing. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 2020:23(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2019.171043810.1080/10095020.2019.1710438
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Ward J. S. T. et al. Large-scale survey of seasonal drinking water quality in Malawi using in situ tryptophan-like fluorescence and conventional water quality indicators. Sci. Total Environ. 2020:744:140674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14067410.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14067432755770
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Sogbanmu T. O., Aitsegame S. O., Otubanjo O. A., Odiyo J. O. Drinking water quality and human health risk evaluations in rural and urban areas of Ibeju-Lekki and Epe local government areas, Lagos, Nigeria. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. An Int. J. 2020:26(4):1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.155442810.1080/10807039.2018.1554428
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Leung K. M. Y. et al. Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for Asia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2020:39(8):1485–1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.478810.1002/etc.4788749608132474951
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Gupta R., Wood D. A. Primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease: Populations, individuals, and health professionals. Lancet 2019:394(10199):685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31893-810.1016/S0140-6736(19)31893-831448740
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] Rao C. Elements of a strategic approach for strengthening national mortality statistics programmes. BMJ Glob. Heal. 2019:4(5):e001810. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-00181010.1136/bmjgh-2019-001810679743031681480
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Ridoutt B. G., Hendrie G. A., Noakes M. Dietary strategies to reduce environmental impact: A critical review of the evidence. Adv. Nutr. 2017:8(6):933–946. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.117.01669110.3945/an.117.016691568299829141975
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Miller V., Webb P., Micha R., Mozaffarian D. Defining diet quality: a synthesis of dietary quality metrics and their validity for the double burden of malnutrition. Lancet Planet. Heal. 2020:4(8):e352–e370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30162-510.1016/S2542-5196(20)30162-5743570132800153
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Acheampong M. et al. Is Ghana Ready to Attain Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Number 7 ? A Comprehensive Assessment of Its Renewable Energy Potential and Pitfalls. Energies 2019:12(3):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1203040810.3390/en12030408
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] Georgeson L., Maslin M. Putting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into practice: A review of implementation, monitoring, and finance. Geo Geogr. Environ. 2018:5(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.4910.1002/geo2.49
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Iancu D., Ionescu G. H., Jianu E., Patrichi I. C., Ghiocel F., Lili T. Assessment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Implementation in Bulgaria and Future Developments. Sustainability 2021:13(21):12000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13211200010.3390/su132112000
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. [61] Benedek J., Holobâc I., Ivan K., Temerdek A. Indicator-based assessment of local and regional progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): An integrated approach from Romania. Sustain. Dev. 2021:29(5):860–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.218010.1002/sd.2180
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. [62] Londoño-Pineda A., Cano J. A., Gómez-Montoya R. Application of AHP for the Weighting of Sustainable Development Indicators at the Subnational Level. Economies 2021:9(4):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies904016910.3390/economies9040169
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. [63] Londoño A., Cano J. A., Czerny M. Governance approach to the prioritization of sustainable development goals in the city of Medellin (Colombia). Urbe 2021:13(e20200288):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.013.e2020028810.1590/2175-3369.013.e20200288
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. [64] Sachs J., Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll C., Lafortune G., Fuller G. Sustainable Development Report 2019: Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. New York, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/sustainable-development-report-2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. [65] OECD. Measuring distance to the SDG targets 2019: An assessment of where OECD countries stand. Paris, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/wise/measuring-distance-to-the-sdg-targets-2019-a8caf3fa-en.htm.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. [66] Eurostat. Sustainable development in the European Union: Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context (2021 edition). Luxembourg, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. [67] UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. New York, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  68. [68] UN. Sustainable Development Goals Progress Chart 2021. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/progress-chart-2021.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  69. [69] Holden E., Linnerud K., Banister D., Schwanitz V., Wierling A. The imperatives of sustainable development: needs, justice, limits. New York, NY: Roudledge, 2018.10.4324/9780203022177
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  70. [70] Maso M. D., Olsen K. H., Dong Y., Pedersen M. B. Sustainable development impacts of nationally determined contributions: assessing the case of mini-grids in Kenya. Clim. Policy 2020:20(7):815–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.164498710.1080/14693062.2019.1644987
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  71. [71] Marcinko C. L. J. et al. The Development of a Framework for the Integrated Assessment of SDG Trade-Offs in the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve. Water 2021:13(4):528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w1304052810.3390/w13040528
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 166 - 181
Published on: Mar 24, 2022
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Appraisal,
assessment,
evaluation,
sustainable development goals,
United Nations,
2030 agenda
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2022 Abraham Allec Londoño-Pineda, Jose Alejandro Cano, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article