Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biodiplomacy Attractiveness in Bioeconomy Education. Case Study Cover

Biodiplomacy Attractiveness in Bioeconomy Education. Case Study

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] Aguilar A., Patermann C. Biodiplomacy, the new frontier for bioeconomy. N. Biotechnol. 2020:59:20–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.00110.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.001
  2. [2] Gerinoviča S. Forest diplomacy as a potential niche diplomacy in Latvia’s foreign policy. Latvijas Universitāte, 2020.
  3. [3] Pubule J., Blumberga A., Rozakis S., Vecina A., Kalnbalkite A., Blumberga D. Education for advancing the implementation of the bioeconomy goals: An analysis of Master Study programmes in bioeconomy. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020:24(2):149–159. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-006210.2478/rtuect-2020-0062
  4. [4] Anholt S. A competitive identity for Latvia: Interim strategy paper. Prepared for the Latvian Institute. 2008.
  5. [5] Vlavianos-Arvanitis A. Biopolitics – a new pathway to bio-diplomacy and bio-education redefining the concept of profit. J. Clean. Prod. 1993:1(2):119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(93)90050-L10.1016/0959-6526(93)90050-L
  6. [6] Edwards P., et al. Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: A review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interface. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019:14(11):113002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab403610.1088/1748-9326/ab4036
  7. [7] Ahamer G. Game, Not Fight: Change Climate Change! Simul. Gaming. 2013:44(2–3):272–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687811247054110.1177/1046878112470541
  8. [8] Blanchard O., Buchs A. Clarifying Sustainable Development Concepts Through Role-Play. Simul. Gaming 2015:46(6):697–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687811456450810.1177/1046878114564508
  9. [9] Thomas M., Partridge T., Pidgeon N., Harthorn B. H., Demski C., Hasell A. Using role play to explore energy perceptions in the United States and United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018:45:363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.02610.1016/j.erss.2018.06.026
  10. [10] Balsiger J. Transdisciplinarity in the class room? Simulating the co-production of sustainability knowledge. Futures 2015:65:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.00510.1016/j.futures.2014.08.005
  11. [11] Ely A. V. Experiential learning in ‘innovation for sustainability’: An evaluation of teaching and learning activities (TLAs) in an international masters course. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018:19(7):1204–1219. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-014110.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0141
  12. [12] Pubule J., Kalnbalkite A., Teirumnieka E., Blumberga D. Evaluation of the Environmental Engineering Study Programme at University. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2019:23(2):310–324. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-007010.2478/rtuect-2019-0070
  13. [13] Sierra J., Suárez-Collado Á. Understanding economic, social, and environmental sustainability challenges in the global south. Sustain. 2021:13(13):13137201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1313720110.3390/su13137201
  14. [14] Rumore D., Schenk T., Susskind L. Role-play simulations for climate change adaptation education and engagement. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016:6(8):745–750. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate308410.1038/nclimate3084
  15. [15] Cruickshank H., Fenner R. Exploring key sustainable development themes through learning activities. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2012:13(3):249–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/1467637121124256210.1108/14676371211242562
  16. [16] Björnberg K. E., Skogh I. B., Strömberg E. Integrating social sustainability in engineering education at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2015:16(5):639–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2014-001010.1108/IJSHE-01-2014-0010
  17. [17] Lozano-García F. J., et al. Capacity building: a course on sustainable development to educate the educators. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2008:9(3):1467–6370. https://doi.org/10.1108/1467637081088588010.1108/14676370810885880
  18. [18] Rotgans J. I., Schmidt H. G. Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learn. Instr. 2011:21(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.00110.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
  19. [19] Fullan M., Langworthy M. A Rich Seam How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson, 2014.
  20. [20] Hattie J. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning. Routledge, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020318152210.4324/9780203181522
  21. [21] Greene J. A., Azevedo R. A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2009:34(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.00610.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
  22. [22] Wei R. C., et al. Evaluating Item Quality in Large-Scale Assessments Phase I Report of the Study of State Assessment Systems. Stanford, 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0091 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 1205 - 1214
Published on: Dec 17, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Anita Vecina, Antra Kalnbalkite, Lauma Zihare, Stelios Rozakis, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.