Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying Key Challenges of the National Energy and Climate Plan through Climate Policy Integration Approach Cover

Identifying Key Challenges of the National Energy and Climate Plan through Climate Policy Integration Approach

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] European Commission. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
  2. [2] Electrification Alliance. Fit for 55% Package: joint position [Online]. Accessed 4.10.2021]. Available: https://www.eurelectric.org/ff-55
  3. [3] Aboltins R., Blumberga D. Key Factors for Successful Implementation of Energy Efficiency Policy Instruments: A Theoretical Study and the Case of Latvia. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2019:23:187–206. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-006310.2478/rtuect-2019-0063
  4. [4] Kettner C., Kletzan-Slamanig D. Is there climate policy integration in European Union energy efficiency and renewable energy policies? Yes, no, maybe. Environ. Policy Gov. 2020:30:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.188010.1002/eet.1880
  5. [5] Kettner C., Kletzan-Slamanig D. Climate policy integration on the national and regional level: A case study for Austria and styria. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2018:8:259–269.
  6. [6] Jacob K., Kannen H. Integrated Strategies for Climate Policy Integration and Coherence: the Case of Germany. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, 2015.
  7. [7] European Commission. National energy and climate plans (NECPs) [Online]. [Accessed 4.10.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-strategy/national-energy-climate-plans_en
  8. [8] Tagliapietra S., et al. The European union energy transition: Key priorities for the next five years. Energy Policy 2019:132:950–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.06010.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.060
  9. [9] CEE Bankwatch Network. MAKING THE GRADE? A review of eight national energy and climate plans in central and eastern Europe. Prague: CEE Bankwatch, 2019.
  10. [10] Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Par Latvijas pielāgošanās klimata pārmaiņām plānu laika posmam līdz 2030. Gadam (On Latvia’s adaptation to climate change plan for the period until 2030.). Latvijas Vestnesis 2019:148. (in Latvian)
  11. [11] United Nations. The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC [Online]. [Accessed 22.03.2021]. Available: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement
  12. [12] European Union. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union 2018:L 328/1.
  13. [13] Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Republic of Latvia. Latvijas stratēģija klimatneitralitātes sasniegšanai līdz 2050.gadam (Latvia’s strategy for achieving climate neutrality by 2050.). Riga: VARAM, 2020. (in Latvian)
  14. [14] Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Nacionālais enerģētikas un klimata plāns 2021.–2030. Gadam (On the Latvian National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030. Year.). Latvijas Vestnesis 2020:29. (in Latvian)
  15. [15] Boulding K.E. Three Faces of Power. CA: Sage, Newbury Park, 1990.
  16. [16] Katre A., Tozzi A. Using hugs, carrots and sticks: How agents exercise power in the transition to community-owned energy systems in remote India. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019:54:2019:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.00810.1016/j.erss.2019.04.008
  17. [17] Marmefelt T. Human knowledge, rules, and the spontaneous evolution of society in the social thought of Darwin, Hayek, and Boulding. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2009:71:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.01310.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.013
  18. [18] Kesting S. Boulding’s welfare approach of communicative deliberation. Ecol. Econ. 2010:69(5):973–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.01010.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.010
  19. [19] Beilock R. The impact of caring on exchange choices and efficiencies: a modification of Boulding’s three social organizers. J. Socio. Econ. 2000:29(3):263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00072-X10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00072-X
  20. [20] Mahmoodi J., et al. Combining “carrot and stick” to incentivize sustainability in households. Energy Policy 2018:123:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.03710.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.037
  21. [21] Rintamäki H., Rikkonen P., Tapio. P. Carrot or stick: Impacts of alternative climate and energy policy scenarios on agriculture. Futures 2016:83:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.00410.1016/j.futures.2016.03.004
  22. [22] Van Den Bergh J. C. J. M., Ferrer-I-Carbonell A., Munda G. Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2000:32:43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00088-910.1016/S0921-8009(99)00088-9
  23. [23] United Nations. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. New York: UN, 1992.
  24. [24] Adelle J., et al. Climate Change and Energy Security in Europe: Policy Integration and its Limits. Stockholm: Sieps, 2009:4.
  25. [25] Jordan A., Lenschow A. Policy paper environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010:20(3):147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.53910.1002/eet.539
  26. [26] Kivimaa P., Mickwitz P. Making the Climate Count. Climate Policy Integration and Coherence in Finland. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute, 2009.
  27. [27] Lafferty W., Hovden E., Lafferty W. M. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical Framework. Env. Polit. 2010:12(3):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401041233130825410.1080/09644010412331308254
  28. [28] Dupont S., Oberthür C. Insufficient Climate Policy Integration in EU Energy Policy: the importance of the long-term perspective. J. Cont. Europ. Res. 2012:8(2):1–24.10.30950/jcer.v8i2.474
  29. [29] Dupont C. Climate Policy Integration in the EU. The Economic, Social and Political Elements of Climate Change. Climate Change Management. Springer, 2011:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_2510.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_25
  30. [30] Runhaar H., Driessen P., Uittenbroek C. Towards a Systematic Framework for the Analysis of Environmental Policy Integration. Environ. Policy Gov. 2014:24:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.164710.1002/eet.1647
  31. [31] Mickwitz D., et al. Climate Policy Integration, Coherence and Governance. PEER, 2009.
  32. [32] European Commission. Europe 2020, 2010. https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET EN BARROSO 007 - Europe 2020 - EN version.pdf (accessed September 18, 2020)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0079 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 1043 - 1060
Published on: Dec 4, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Reinis Aboltins, Dzintars Jaunzems, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.