References
- [1] Official statistics of Latvia. Official statistics portal. Population number, its changes and density. Population of rural and urban territories [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2021]. Available: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/population/population-number/247-population-number-its-changes-and-density
- [2] Ministry of Economy. Latvijas ekonomikas attīstības pārskats (Latvian economic development report.). Rīga: MoE, 2019. (in Latvian)
- [3] European Commission. Commission staff working document. Commission recommendations for Latvia’s CAP strategic plan. SWD (2020) 386 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2020.
- [4] Gancone A., et al. Latvia’s National GHG Inventory report 1990 – 2018 to the UNFCCC. Riga: VARAM, 2020.
- [5] Latvia’s National Energy and Climate plan 2021. – 2030. Riga: Cabinet of Ministers, 2020.
- [6] Gancone A., et al. Latvia’s forth Biennial Report to the UNFCCC. Riga: VARAM, 2019.
- [7] European Commission. Communication from the commission – The European Green Deal. COM/2019/640 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
- [8] Fusco G., et al. How to Improve the Diffusion of Climate-Smart Agriculture: What the Literature Tells us. Sustainability 2020:12(12):5168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1212516810.3390/su12125168
- [9] Muizniece I., et al. Circular Economy and Bioeconomy Interaction Development as Future for Rural Regions. Case Study of Aizkraukle Region in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):129–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-008410.2478/rtuect-2019-0084
- [10] Pubule J., et al. Sectoral Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Possibilities. Why Broad Spectrum of Indicators is Applied. Energy Procedia 2017:113:377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.01510.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.015
- [11] Brazdausks P., et al. Evaluation of cellulose content in hemp shives after salt catalyzed hydrolysis. Energy Procedia 2017:128:297–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.31610.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.316
- [12] IPCC. Climate change 2014. Synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC, 2015.
- [13] European Commission. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. COM/2020/381 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2020.
- [14] Lipper L., Zilberman D. A Short History of the Evolution of the Climate Smart Agriculture Approach and Its Links to Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture Debates. In Lipper L., McCarthy N., Zilberman D., Asfaw S., Branca G. (eds) Climate Smart Agriculture. Natural Resource Management and Policy 2018:52:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_210.1007/978-3-319-61194-5_2
- [15] Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE Sourcebook. Rome: FAO, 2013.
- [16] “Climate-Smart” Agriculture Policies, Practices and Financing for Food Security, Adaptation and Mitigation Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: FAO, 2010.
- [17] Lipper L., et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change 2014:4:1068–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate243710.1038/nclimate2437
- [18] Amin A., et al. Climate Smart Agriculture: an approach for sustainable food security. Agricultural Research Communication 2015:2(3):13–21.
- [19] Climate Smart Agriculture [Online]. [Accessed: 22.03.2021]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/topics/climate-smart-agriculture
- [20] Campbell B. M., et al. Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2014:8:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002.10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002
- [21] Pagliacci F., et al. Drivers of farmers’ adoption and continuation of climate-smart agricultural practices. A study from northeastern Italy. Science of The Total Environment 2020:710:136345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13634510.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13634531927289
- [22] Climate-Smart Agriculture. World Bank [Online]. [Accessed: 22.03.2021]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climate-smart-agriculture
- [23] Long T. B., Blok V., Coninx I. The diffusion of climate-smart agricultural innovations: Systems level factors that inhibit sustainable entrepreneurial action. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:232:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.21210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.212
- [24] Tesfai M., et al. Transition towards bio-based economy in small-scale agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa through sustainable intensification. The Bioeconomy Approach. Constraints and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. London: Routledge, 2020.10.4324/9780429320651-5
- [25] Senyolo M. P., et al. How the characteristics of innovations impact their adoption: an exploration of climate-smart agricultural innovations in South Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:172:3825–3840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.019
- [26] Khatri-Chhetri A., et al. Stakeholders prioritization of climate-smart agriculture interventions: Evaluation of a framework. Agricultural Systems 2019:174:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.00210.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.002
- [27] Long T. B., Blok V., Coninx I. Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:112(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044
- [28] Harold A. L., Turoff M., Helmer O. The Delphi Method Techniques and Applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
- [29] Green R.A. The Delphi Technique in Educational Research. Education Theory and Practice, Educational Research, Research Methods 2014:4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401452977310.1177/2158244014529773
- [30] Dick S., et al. The Delphi Method Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2015:37:31–63. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.0370210.17705/1CAIS.03702
- [31] San-Jose L., Retolaza J. L. Is the Delphi method valid for business ethics? A survey analysis. European Journal for Futures Research 2016:4:19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0109-x10.1007/s40309-016-0109-x
- [32] Rowe G., Wright G., Expert Opinions in Forecasting. Role of the Delphi Technique. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook of Researchers and Practitioners. In Armstrong J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 2001:30:125–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_710.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_7
- [33] Pubule J., et al. Finding an optimal solution for biowaste management in the Baltic States. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015:88:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.053.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.053
- [34] Hwang C. L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-910.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
- [35] Tzeng G. H., Huang J. J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1201/b1103210.1201/b11032
- [36] UNFCCC. Report on the technical review of the fourth biennial report of Latvia. Bonn: UNFCCC, 2020.
- [37] Bumbiere K., et al. Carbon balance of biogas production from maize in Latvian conditions. Agronomy Research 2021:19(1):687–697. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.085
- [38] Rivza P., et al. Greenhouse gas emission reduction opportunities with climate-friendly agriculture and forestry in Latvia. Jelgava: LLU, 2018. (in Latvian)
- [39] Popluga D., Naglis-Liepa K. Evaluation of measures for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions suitable for Latvian agriculture. Engineering for Rural Development 2015:584–589.
- [40] Bumbiere K., et al. Ranking of Bioresources for Biogas Production. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):368–377. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0021.10.2478/rtuect-2020-0021
- [41] Bumbiere K., Pubule J., Blumberga D. What Will Be the Future of Biogas Sector? Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):295–305. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0021.10.2478/rtuect-2021-0021
- [42] Naglis-Liepa K., Popluga D. Integrated impact assessment of agricultural GHG abatement measures.2018. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference “Economic science for rural development” 2018:49:77–83. https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.12110.22616/ESRD.2018.121
- [43] Oliveira M. F., et al. Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture: Case Study of Lis Valley Irrigation District, Portugal. Sustainability 2019:11(2):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020331.10.3390/su11020331