Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Selection of Iron-based Additives for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge using the Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach Cover

Selection of Iron-based Additives for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge using the Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. [1] Vannarath A., Thalla A. K. Evaluation, Ranking, and Selection of Pretreatment Methods for the Conversion of Biomass to Biogas Using Multi-criteria Decision-making Approach. Environment Systems and Decisions 2020:40:510–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09749-910.1007/s10669-019-09749-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bharathiraja B., et al. Biogas Production–A Review on Composition, Fuel Properties, Feedstock and Principles of Anaerobic Digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:90(C):570–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.09310.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Puyol D., et al. Exploring the Effects of ZVI Addition on Resource Recovery in the Anaerobic Digestion Process. Chemical Engineering Journal 2018:335:703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.02910.1016/j.cej.2017.11.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Ugwu S. N., Enweremadu C. C. Enhancement of Biogas Production Process from Biomass Wastes Using Iron-based Additives: Types, Impacts, and Implications. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.178867510.1080/15567036.2020.1788675
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Ghaleb A. A. S., et al. Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Methane Production from Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Oily-Biological Sludge and Sugarcane Bagasse. Sustainability 2020:12(5):2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1205211610.3390/su12052116
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Siami S., et al. Process Optimization and Effect of Thermal, Alkaline, H2O2 Oxidation and Combination Pretreatment of Sewage Sludge on Solubilization and Anaerobic Digestion. BMC Biotechnology 2020:20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-020-00614-110.1186/s12896-020-00614-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Vamza I., Valters K., Blumberga D. Multi-Criteria Analysis of Lignocellulose Substrate Pre-Treatment. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):483–492. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-011810.2478/rtuect-2020-0118
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Zhao Z., et al. Comparing the Mechanisms of ZVI and Fe3O4 for Promoting Waste-activated Sludge Digestion. Water Research 2018:144:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.02810.1016/j.watres.2018.07.028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Zhang Z., et al. Impact of Pretreatment on Solid State Anaerobic Digestion of Yard Waste for Biogas Production. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2014:30(2):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1473-310.1007/s11274-013-1473-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Baruah J., et al. Recent Trends in the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Value-added Products. Frontiers in Energy Research 2018:6:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.0014110.3389/fenrg.2018.00141
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Abdelsalam E., et al. Comparison of Nanoparticles Effects on Biogas and Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Dung Slurry. Renewable Energy 2016:87:592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.05310.1016/j.renene.2015.10.053
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Pastare L., Romagnoli F. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Biogas Production from Cerathophyllum demersum, Fucus vesiculosus and Ulva intestinalis in Latvian Conditions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):258–271. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-006710.2478/rtuect-2019-0067
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Menon A., Wang J. Y., Giannis A. Optimization of Micronutrient Supplement for Enhancing Biogas Production from Food Waste in Two-phase Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion. Waste Management 2017:59:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.01710.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Chen R., Konishi Y., Nomura T. Enhancement of Methane Production by Methanosarcina barkeri Using Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as Iron Sustained Release Agent. Advanced Powder Technology 2018:29(10):2429–2433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.06.02210.1016/j.apt.2018.06.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Casals E., et al. Programmed Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Disintegration in Anaerobic Digesters Boosts Biogas Production. Small 2014:10(14):2801–2808. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20130370310.1002/smll.201303703
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Feng Y., et al. Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge by the Addition of Zero Valent Iron. Water Research 2014:52:242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.07210.1016/j.watres.2013.10.072
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Zhang Z., et al. Application of Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles During the Two-stage Anaerobic Digestion with Waste Sludge: Impact on the Biogas Production and the Substrate Metabolism. Renewable Energy 2020:146:2724–2735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.07810.1016/j.renene.2019.08.078
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Abdelwahab T. A. M., et al. Impact of Iron Nanoparticles on Biogas Production and Effluent Chemical Composition from Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00985-710.1007/s13399-020-00985-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Zhang W., Zhang L., Li A. Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste by Trace Metal Elements Supplementation and Reduced Metals Dosage by Green Chelating Agent [S, S]-EDDS via Improving Metals Bioavailability. Water Research 2015:84:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.01010.1016/j.watres.2015.07.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Rao P. V., Baral S. S. Attribute-based specification, comparison and selection of feedstock for anaerobic digestion using MADM approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011:186(2–3):2009-2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.10810.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.108
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ashby M. F. Multi-objective Optimization in Material Design and Selection. Acta Materialia 2000:48(1):359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00304-310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00304-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Pohekar S. D., Ramachandran M. Application of Multi-criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning—A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2004:8(4):365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.00710.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Oluah C., Akinlabi E. T., Njoku O. H. Selection of Phase Change Material for Improved Performance of Trombe Wall Systems Using the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Methodology. Energy & Buildings 2020:217:109967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.10996710.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109967
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Bumbiere K., et al. Ranking of Bioresources for Biogas Production. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):368–377. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-002110.2478/rtuect-2020-0021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Ghandi P., et al. Multicriteria Decision Model and Thermal Pretreatment of Hotel Food Waste for Robust Output to Biogas: Case Study from City of Jaipur, India. BioMed Research International 2018:9416249. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/941624910.1155/2018/9416249
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Ugwu S. N., Biscoff R. K., Enweremadu C. C. A Meta-analysis of Iron-based Additives on Enhancements of Biogas Yields During Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Wastes. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:269:122449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12244910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122449
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Cioabla A. E., et al. Comparative Study on Factors Affecting Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Vegetal Residues. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012:5(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-3910.1186/1754-6834-5-39
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Hwang C. L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Zhu Y., Tian D., Yan F. Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-making. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020:3564835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/356483510.1155/2020/3564835
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Ye J., et al. Enhancing Sludge Methanogenesis with Improved Redox Activity of Extracellular Polymeric Substances by Hematite in Red Mud. Water Research 2018:134:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.06210.1016/j.watres.2018.01.062
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Ambuchi J. J., et al. Hematite and Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes Stimulate a Faster Syntrophic Pathway during Methanogenic Beet Sugar Industrial Wastewater Degradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018:102:7147–7158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9100-810.1007/s00253-018-9100-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Aguilar-Moreno G. S., et al. Enhancing Methane Yield of Chicken Litter in Anaerobic Digestion Using Magnetite Nanoparticles. Renewable Energy 2020:147:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.11110.1016/j.renene.2019.08.111
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Wang M., Zhao Z., Zhang Y. Sustainable Strategy for Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge: Driving Dissimilatory Iron Reduction with Fenton Sludge. ACS Sustainable Chemical Engineering 2018:6:222-02230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0363710.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03637
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Suanon F., et al. Application of Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron and Iron Powder During Sludge Anaerobic Digestion: Impact on Methane Yield and Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products Degradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2017:321:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.07610.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.076
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Amen T. W., et al. Biochemical Methane Potential Enhancement of Domestic Sludge Digestion by Adding Pristine Iron Nanoparticles and Iron Nanoparticles-coated Zeolite Compositions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2017:5(5):5002–5013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.03010.1016/j.jece.2017.09.030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Lizama A. C., et al. Enhancing the Performance and Stability of the Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge by Zero Valent Iron Nanoparticles Dosage. Bioresource Technology 2019:275:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.08610.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.086
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Yu B., et al. Variations of Organic Matters and Microbial Community in Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge with the Addition of Ferric Salts. Bioresource Technology 2015:179:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.01110.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Hao X., et al. Analysing the Mechanisms of Sludge Digestion Enhanced by Iron. Water Research 2017:117:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.04810.1016/j.watres.2017.03.048
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Zhen G., et al. Influence of zero valent scrap iron (ZVSI) supply on methane production from waste activated sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal 2015:263:461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.00310.1016/j.cej.2014.11.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Abdelsalam E., et al. Influence of Zero Valent Iron Nanoparticles and Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Biogas and Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Manure. Energy 2017:120:842–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.13710.1016/j.energy.2016.11.137
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 422 - 435
Published on: Jul 20, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Additives,
entropy method,
iron-based,
MADM,
TOPSIS
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Samson Ugwu, Christopher Enweremadu, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article