Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How to Assess Policy Impact in National Energy and Climate Plans Cover

How to Assess Policy Impact in National Energy and Climate Plans

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. [1] Li M., Patiño-Echeverri D., Zhang J. Policies to promote energy efficiency and air emissions reductions in China’s electric power generation sector during the 11th and 12th five-year plan periods: Achievements, remaining challenges, and opportunities. Energy Policy 2019:125:429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.00810.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Rammer C., et al. Does energy policy hurt international competitiveness of firms? A comparative study for Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Energy Policy 2017:109:154–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.062">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.06210.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.062
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Phylipsen G. J. M. Phylipsen Climate Change Consulting Energy Efficiency Indicators Best practice and potential use in developing country policy making. Utrecht: Phylipsen Climate Change Consulting, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Irena. Synergies between Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: A working paper based on REmap 2030. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] European Parliament. Energy policy: general principles. Fact Sheets The European Parliament [Online]. [Accessed 22.04.2021]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/68/energetikas-politika-visparejieprincipi
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] European Commission. Combined Evaluation Roadmap / Inception Impact Assessment. Brussles: European Commission, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Huang H-T. Decentralized Energy: Grassroots, Participatory Forms and Mutual Shaping with Regional Economies in the cases of Freiburg, Higashi-Ohmi and YuanLi. Doktorarbeit. Freiburg: Freiburg Universitat https://doi.org/10.6094/UNIFR/14951">https://doi.org/10.6094/UNIFR/14951
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Rissman J., et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Applied Energy 2020:266:114848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11484810.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] US EPA. Part One: The Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Washington: EPA, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] European Commission. A European Green Deal | European Commission. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] European Commission. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions. European Commission, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] European Commission. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC Text with EEA relevance. Oficcial Journal of the European Union 2012:L 315/1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] European Commission. Energy efficiency directive | Energy [Online]. [Accessed 22.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] European Commission. Energy efficiency targets | Energy [Online]. [Accessed 19.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/targets-directive-and-rules/eu-targets-energy-efficiency_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Balode L., Dolge K., Blumberga D. The Contradictions between District and Individual Heating towards Green Deal Targets. Sustainability 2021:13(6):3370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063370">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1306337010.3390/su13063370
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Cabinet of Ministers. Latvia’s National Energy And Climate Plan 2021–2030. Riga: Cabinet of Ministers, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] European Commision. Assessment of the final national energy and climate plan of Latvia. Brussels: European Commission, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Aboltins R., et al. Are hugs, carrots and sticks essential for energy policy: A study of Latvia’s national energy and climate plan. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):309–324. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0075">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-007510.2478/rtuect-2020-0075
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Schultzt R., et al. Regulation:, Better Indicators For Better Experience, The OECD iREG. 2019.10.32796/ice.2019.907.6806
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] European Commision. Better regulation Toolbox. 2017 [Online]. [Accessed 18.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation-why-andhow/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox/better-regulation-toolbox_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] European Commision. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Better Regulation guidelines - impact assessment. [Accessed 16.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation-why-and-how/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Coglianese C. Measuring Regulatory Performance. Evaluating The Impact Of Regulation And Regulatory Policy.Paris: OECD, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] ODYSSEE-MURE. Successful Energy Efficiency Policies Tool [Online]. [Accessed 16.04.2021]. Available: https://www.measures.odyssee-mure.eu/successful-efficiency-measures-tool.html#/methodology
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Warren P. Demand-Side Management Policy: Mechanisms for Success and Failure. London: UCL Energy Institute, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Barnum C. Usability Testing Essentials. Elsevier Inc., 2011.10.1016/B978-0-12-375092-1.00006-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Waris M., et al. An application of analytic hierarchy process (ahp) for sustainable procurement of construction equipment: Multicriteria-based decision framework for malaysia. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2019:6391431. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6391431">https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/639143110.1155/2019/6391431
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Lemke C., Bastini K. Embracing multiple perspectives of sustainable development in a composite measure: The Multilevel Sustainable Development Index. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:246:118884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118884">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11888410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118884
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Kyn P., Upadhyaya S., Nice T. Composite index as a measure on achieving Sustainable Development Goal 9 ( SDG-9) industry-related targets : The SDG-9 index. Applied Energy 2020:265:114755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114755">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11475510.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114755
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Barrera-Roldán A., Saldívar-Valdés A. Proposal and application of a Sustainable Development Index. Ecological Indicators 2002:2(3):251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-410.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Triantaphyllou E. Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges. The International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice 1995:2(1):35–44.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] European Commision. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union 2018: L328/1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] European Parliament. Energy efficiency [Online]. [Accessed 22.04.2021]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/69/energoefektivitate
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] European Commision. Energy efficiency first: accelerating towards a 2030 objective of 32.5% [Online]. [Accessed 19.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/energy-efficiency-first-accelerating-towards-2030-objective-2019-sep-25_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] European Commision. Making Energy Efficiency First principle operational [Online]. [Accessed 19.04.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/839509
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Cabinet of Ministers. Energy Efficiency Law. Latvijas Vēstnesis 2016:52.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Cabinet of Ministers. Regulations Regarding the Energy Efficiency Obligation Scheme. Latvijas Vēstnesis 2017:97.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 405 - 421
Published on: Jul 16, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Energy and climate plans,
energy policies,
composite sustainability index,
impact assessment,
multi-criteria decision method
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Lauma Balode, Kristiāna Dolge, Peter D. Lund, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article