Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ranking EU Climate and Energy Policies Cover

Ranking EU Climate and Energy Policies

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. [1] Dudin M. N., Frolova E. E., Protopopova O. V., Mamedov A., Odintsov S. V. Study of innovative technologies in the energy industry: Nontraditional and renewable energy sources. Enterpreneurship and Sustainibility Issues 2019:6(4):1704–1713. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(11)">https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(11)10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(11)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Eur. Wind Energy Conf. Exhib. 2008:1:32–38.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of European Union 2018: L 328.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Commission. A Clean Planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision. 2018. [Online]. [Accessed: 19.03.2021]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773&from=EN
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Lowe S. The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism How to make it work for developing countries. 2021. [Online]. [Accessed: 14.06.2021]. Available: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pbrief_cbam_sl_21.4.21.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Cifci E., Oliver M. E. Reassessing the links between GHG emissions, economic growth, and the UNFCCC: A difference-in-differences approach. Sustainability 2018:10(2):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020334">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1002033410.3390/su10020334
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Papież M., Śmiech S., Frodyma K. Effects of renewable energy sector development on electricity consumption – Growth nexus in the European Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:113:109276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109276">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.10927610.1016/j.rser.2019.109276
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Fraune C., Knodt M. Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science 2018:43:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.02910.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Ntanos S., Skordoulis M., Kyriakopoulos G., Arabatzis G., Chalikias M., Galatsidas, S., Batzios A., Katsarou A. Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence from European Countries. Sustainability 2018:10(8):10082626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082626">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1008262610.3390/su10082626
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Simionescu M., Yuriy B., Gedek S., Streimikiene D. The Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Cereal Production in the European Union. Sustainability 2019:11(12):3433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123433">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1112343310.3390/su11123433
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Gielen D., Boshell F., Saygin D., Bazilian M. D., Wagner N., Gorini R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019:24:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.00610.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Marinaș M.-C., Dinu M., Socol A.-G., Socol C. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth. Causality relationship in Central and Eastern European countries. PLoS One 2018:13(10):e0202951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202951">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.020295110.1371/journal.pone.0202951617550430296307
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Saad W., Taleb A. The causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from Europe. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 2018:20(1):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1463-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1463-510.1007/s10098-017-1463-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Tavakoli A. A journey among top ten emitter country, decomposition of ‘Kaya Identity’. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018:38:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.04010.1016/j.scs.2017.12.040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Liobikienė G., Butkus M. The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policy. Renewable Energy 2017:106:298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.036">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.03610.1016/j.renene.2017.01.036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] International Atomic Energy Agency. Energy indicators for sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. 2007. [Online]. [Accessed: 10.06.2021]. Available: http://wwwpub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1222_web.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Papież M., Śmiech S., Frodyma K. Determinants of renewable energy development in the EU countries. A 20-year perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:91:918–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.075">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.07510.1016/j.rser.2018.04.075
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Liobikienė G., Butkus M. The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Science of the Total Environment 2018:642:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.140">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.14010.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.14029929151
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Liobikienė G., Butkus M. Scale, composition, and technique effects through which the economic growth, foreign direct investment, urbanization, and trade affect greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable Energy 2019:132:1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.032">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.03210.1016/j.renene.2018.09.032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Rugani B., Marvuglia A., Pulselli F. M. Predicting Sustainable Economic Welfare – Analysis and perspectives for Luxembourg based on energy policy scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2018:137:288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.00510.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Siksnelyte I., Zavadskas E. K., Bausys R., Streimikiene D. Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method. Energy Policy 2019:125:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.01310.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Lyeonov S., Pimonenko T., Bilan Y., Štreimikienė D., Mentel G. Assessment of Green Investments’ Impact on Sustainable Development: Linking Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Renewable Energy. Energies 2019:12(20):12203891. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12203891">https://doi.org/10.3390/en1220389110.3390/en12203891
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Cohen G., Jalles J. T., Loungani P., Marto R., Wang G. Decoupling of emissions and GDP: Evidence from aggregate and provincial Chinese data. Energy Economics 2019:77:105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.030">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.03010.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Vasylieva T., Lyulyov O., Bilan Y., Streimikiene D. Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption. Energies 2019:12(17):3289. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173289">https://doi.org/10.3390/en1217328910.3390/en12173289
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Sánchez D. R., Hoadley A. F. A., Khalilpour K. R. A multi-objective extended input–output model for a regional economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2019:20:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.04.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.04.00910.1016/j.spc.2019.04.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Baležentis T., Streimikiene D., Zhang T., Liobikiene G. The role of bioenergy in greenhouse gas emission reduction in EU countries: An Environmental Kuznets Curve modelling. Resources Conservation and Recycling 2019:142:225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.01910.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Cucchiella F., D’Adamo I., Gastaldi M., Miliacca M. Efficiency and allocation of emission allowances and energy consumption over more sustainable European economies. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:182:805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.079">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.07910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.079
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Alola A. A., Bekun F. V., Sarkodie S. A. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 2019:685:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.13910.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.13931203164
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Zheng X., Streimikiene D., Balezentis T., Mardani A., Cavallaro F., Liao H. A review of greenhouse gas emission profiles, dynamics, and climate change mitigation efforts across the key climate change players. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:234:1113–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.140">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.14010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.140
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Nong D., Siriwardana M. Effects on the U.S. economy of its proposed withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: A quantitative assessment. Energy 2018:159:621–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.178">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.17810.1016/j.energy.2018.06.178
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Saqib N. Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Empirical evidence from gulf cooperation council countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2018:8(6):392–400. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7269">https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.726910.32479/ijeep.7269
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Rajbhandari S., Limmeechokchai B., Masui T. The impact of different GHG reduction scenarios on the economy and social welfare of Thailand using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2019:9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0200-9">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0200-910.1186/s13705-019-0200-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Eurostat database, No Title, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.04.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/env_air_gge_esms.htm
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] EnerData, Odyssee-Mure database, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.04.2021]. Available: https://odyssee.enerdata.net/home/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Turskis Z., Zavadskas E. K., Peldschus F. Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Eng. Econ. 2009:1(61):7–17.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Malta Resources Authority, Third Biennial Report, 2018. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.04.2021]. Available: https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionsStaging/NationalReports/Documents/92604815_Malta-BR3-1-BR3_Malta_final.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 367 - 381
Published on: Jul 16, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Energy indicators,
environmental performance indicators,
energy efficiency,
climate policy evaluation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Ieva Pakere, Toms Prodanuks, Agris Kamenders, Ivars Veidenbergs, Stefan Holler, Agnese Villere, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article