Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of Energy Retrofit Assessment Methodologies in Buildings by European Research Projects Cover

Analysis of Energy Retrofit Assessment Methodologies in Buildings by European Research Projects

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. [1] Gupta J., Chakraborty M. Energy efficiency in buildings. In Sustainable Fuel Technologies Handbook 2021:457– 480. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00016-010.1016/B978-0-12-822989-7.00016-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00016-010.1016/B978-0-12-822989-7.00016-0</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] European Commission. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] European Commission. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 30 may 2018 amending directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Gonzalez-Caceres A., Lassen A. K., Nielsen T. R. Barriers and challenges of the recommendation list of measures under the EPBD scheme: A critical review. Energy and Buildings 2020:223:110065. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11006510.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110065" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11006510.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110065</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] European Commission and Directorate-General for Energy. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 of 8 May 2019 on building renovation. Official Journal of European Union 2019: L 127/1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Geissler S. et al. Identifying and rating deep renovation opportunities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019:323(1). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/01217410.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012174" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/01217410.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012174</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Medjelekh D., Kenai A., Claude S., Ginestet S., Escadeillas G. Multi-technique characterization of ancient materials as part of an eco-renovation of historic centres, case of Cahors centre in France. Construction and Building Materials 2020:250:118894. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11889410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118894" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11889410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118894</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Egusquiza A., Izkara J. L., Gandini A. Energy efficiency improvement in historic urban environments: From decision support systems to co-creation strategies. 3rd International Conference Energy Efficiency in Historical Buildings.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] ALDREN project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. https://aldren.eu/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Sesana M. M., Salvalai G. A review on Building Renovation Passport: Potentialities and barriers on current initiatives. Energy and Buildings 2018:173:195–205. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.02710.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.027" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.02710.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.027</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Gómez Oñate V. REFURB project’s presentation in Covenan of Mayors for Climate & Energy, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Pomianowski M., Antonov Y. I., Heiselberg P. Development of energy renovation packages for the Danish residential sector. Energy Procedia 2019:158:2847–2852. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.04810.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.04810.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.048</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Vavallo M. et al. Accelerating Energy Renovation Solution for Zero Energy Buildings and Neighbourhoods. The Experience of the RenoZEB Project. Proceedings of Sustainable Places 2019:20(1). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings201902000110.3390/proceedings2019020001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings201902000110.3390/proceedings2019020001</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] ReValue project. The value of energy efficiency. 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 10.02.2021]. Available: https://revalue-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Final-Report-.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] mPower project. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://municipalpower.org/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Villamor E. et al. European cities in the energy transition: A preliminary analysis of 27 cities. Energies 2020:16(3):1–25. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061315.10.3390/en13061315" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061315.10.3390/en13061315</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] REPLICATE project. Report on indicators for monitoring at city level, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5afee0522&appId=PPGMS
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] REPLICATE project. Report on indicators for monitoring at project level, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5afede3ba&appId=PPGMS
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] GrowSmarter project. Final Report on Results of Technical and Social Validation. 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://grow-smarter.eu/fileadmin/editor-upload/Reports/GrowSmarter_Validation.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] RemoUrban project, Retrofit Social Housing Report– Better Homes Improve Lives, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/418439-retrofit-social-housing-better-homes-improve-lives
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Freeman R., Yearworth M. Climate change and cities: problem structuring methods and critical perspectives on low-carbon districts. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2017:25:48–64. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.00910.1016/j.erss.2016.11.009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.00910.1016/j.erss.2016.11.009</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] STEEP project. Guidelines for prioritising interventions, 2014. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.03.2021]. Available: https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/sites/www.smartcitiesinfosystem.eu/files/steep_guidelines_for_prioritising_interventions.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Costa G., Sicilia Á., Oregi X., Pedrero J., Mabe L. A catalogue of energy conservation measures (ECM) and a tool for their application in energy simulation models. Journal of Building Engineering 2020:29:101102. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10110210.1016/j.jobe.2019.101102" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10110210.1016/j.jobe.2019.101102</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] García-Fuentes M., Álvarez S., Serna V., Pousse M., Meiss A. Integration of prioritisation criteria in the design of energy efficient retrofitting projects at district scale: A case study. Sustainability 2019:11(14). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su1114386110.3390/su11143861" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1114386110.3390/su11143861</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] D’Appolonia S.p.A., EASEE project Final Report. 2016. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.03.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/285/285540/final1-easee-final-report-public-attachment.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Salvalai G., Sesana M. M., Iannaccone G. Deep renovation of multi-storey multi-owner existing residential buildings: A pilot case study in Italy. Energy and Buildings 2017:148:23–36. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.01110.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.01110.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.011</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Kamari A., Kirkegaard P. H., Leslie Schultz C. P. PARADIS – A process integrating tool for rapid generation and evaluation of holistic renovation scenarios. Journal of Building Engineering 2021:34:101944. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10194410.1016/j.jobe.2020.101944" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10194410.1016/j.jobe.2020.101944</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Kamari A., Corrao R., Kirkegaard P. H. Sustainability focused decision-making in building renovation, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ., 2017:6(2):330–350. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.00110.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.00110.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Madrazo L., Sicilia A., Massetti M., Plazas F. L., Ortet E. Enhancing energy performance certificates with energy related data to support decision making for building retrofitting. Therm. Sci. 2018:22(S3):957–969. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI171005028M10.2298/TSCI171005028M" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI171005028M10.2298/TSCI171005028M</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Alokabide, Plan Zero CO2 – Rehabilitación Energética y Accesbilidad del Parque Público de Alquiler. (Alokabide, Zero CO2 Plan - Energy Rehabilitation and Accessibility of the Public Rental Park). 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. Available: https://www.alokabide.euskadi.eus/plan-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-plan-zero-plana/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] EU Cordis webpage – Agree project. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/847068
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Agree project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: https://agree-basquecountry.eu/es/proyecto-agree/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Ruiz-Pérez M. R., Alba-Rodríguez M. D., Castaño-Rosa R., Solís-Guzmán J., Marrero M. HEREVEA tool for economic and environmental impact evaluation for sustainable planning policy in housing renovation. Sustainability 2019:11(10). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su1110285210.3390/su11102852" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1110285210.3390/su11102852</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] RemoUrban project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: http://www.remourban.eu/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] European Commission. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Mistretta M., Guarino F., Cellura M. Energy and environmental assessment of heritage building retrofit. In: Bevilacqua C., Calabrò F., Della Spina L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 178. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_13010.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_130" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_13010.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_130</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] ISO 14040:2006, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. p. 20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Wackernagel M., Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society, 1996.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] EN 16627:2015. Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of economic performance of buildings – Calculation methods.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Oregi X., Hernández R. J., Hernandez P. Environmental and economic prioritization of building energy refurbishment strategies with life-cycle approach. Sustainability 2020:12(9):3914. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su1209391410.3390/su12093914" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/su1209391410.3390/su12093914</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Foster V., Tre J.-P., Wodon Q., Bank W. Energy prices, energy efficiency, and fuel poverty. [Online]. [Accessed: 21.02.2021]. Available: http://www.mediaterre.org/docactu,bWF4aW0vZG9jcy9wZTE=,1.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Perez-Bezos S., Grijalba O., Irulegi O. Proposal for Prioritizing the Retrofitting of Residential Buildings in Energy Poverty Circumstances. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):66–79. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-008610.2478/rtuect-2020-0086" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-008610.2478/rtuect-2020-0086</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Tommasi L. De, Ridouane H., Giannakis G., Katsigarakis K., Lilis G. N., Rovas D. Model-based comparative evaluation of building and district control-oriented energy retrofit scenarios. Buildings 2018:8(7):1–20. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings807009110.3390/buildings8070091" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings807009110.3390/buildings8070091</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Etxebarria M., Oregi X., Grijalba O., Hernández R. J. Relationship Between Energy Demand, Indoor Thermal Behaviour and Temperature-Related Health Risk Concerning Passive Energy Refurbishment Interventions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):348–363. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-007810.2478/rtuect-2020-0078" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-007810.2478/rtuect-2020-0078</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] ISO 7730:2006. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] ISO-7726:2002. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Instruments for measuring physical quantities.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] EN 15251:2008 Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Monzón M., López-Mesa B. Buildings performance indicators to prioritise multi-family housing renovations. Sustainable Cities and Society 2017:38:109–122. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.02410.1016/j.scs.2017.12.024" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.02410.1016/j.scs.2017.12.024</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Egusquiza-Ortega A. Multiscale Information Management for Historic Districts′ Energy Retrofitting, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Li Y., Kubicki S., Guerriero A., Rezgui Y. Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:113:109244. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.10924410.1016/j.rser.2019.109244" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.10924410.1016/j.rser.2019.109244</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Jimenez-Bescos C., Oregi X. Implementing User Behaviour on Dynamic Building Simulations for Energy Consumption. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):308–318. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009710.2478/rtuect-2019-0097" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009710.2478/rtuect-2019-0097</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Vilches A., Garcia-Martinez A., Sanchez-Montañes B. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings 2017:135:286–301. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.04210.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.04210.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] STEEP project, Guidelines for monitoring impacts, 2014. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. Available: https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/sites/default/files/steep_guidelines_for_monitoring_impacts.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 265 - 280
Published on: Jun 20, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Building energy renovation,
decarbonising,
energy-efficient buildings,
energy transition,
holistic renovation,
Life Cycle Assessment,
urban regeneration
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Markel Arbulu, Olatz Grijalba, Xabat Oregi, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article