Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of CO2 Valorisation Options for Regional Development Cover

Analysis of CO2 Valorisation Options for Regional Development

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. [1] Chery D., Lair V., Cassir M. Overview on CO2 valorization: challenge of molten carbonates. Frontiers in Energy Research 2015:3:43. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2015.0004310.3389/fenrg.2015.00043" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2015.0004310.3389/fenrg.2015.00043</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Alvarez E., et al. EU Demonstration Programme for CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS). ZEP’s Proposal. 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] European Commission. A European Green Deal [Online]. [Accessed 16.10.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Parliament. Legislative Train 12.2020. 1A European Green Deal. Strasbourg: EP, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] European Commission. 2030 climate and energy framework [Online]. [Accessed 10.01.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Statista. Share of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuels and cements as of 2020, by economic sector [Online]. [Accessed 18.09.2020]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1129656/global-share-of-co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuel-and-cement/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Our World Data. CO2 emissions [Online]. [Accessed 18.09.2020]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Eurostat. Greenhouse emissions by source sector [Online]. [Accessed 19.05.2021]. Available: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_air_gge&lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Ritchie H. Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? Our World in data. 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] International Atomic Energy Agency. Transitions to low carbon electricity systems: Key economic and investment trends. Vienna: IAEA, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Central Statistical Bureau Databases. Air emissions accounts [Online]. [Accessed 7.09.2020]. Available: https://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/vide/vide__vide__ikgad/VIG070.px/table/tableViewLayout1/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Eurostat News release. Early estimates of CO2 emissions from energy use. Luxembourg: Eurostat Press Office, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Kudurs E., et al. Are Industries Open for Renewable Energy? Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):447–456. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-011510.2478/rtuect-2020-0115" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-011510.2478/rtuect-2020-0115</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Latvian Center for Environment, Geology and Meteorology. 2020. gadā iesniegtās siltumnīcefekta gāzu inventarizācijas kopsavilkums (Greenhouse gases inventory summary, submitted in 2020.) Riga: LVGMC, 2020. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] MefCO2 project [Online]. [Accessed 15.11.2020]. Available: http://www.mefco2.eu/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Phoenix Initiative. A European Integrated Approach to CO2 Valorisation [Online]. [Accessed 06.03.2021]. Available: https://www.phoenix-co2-valorisation.eu/lw_resource/datapool/systemfiles/cbox/56/live/lw_datei/flyer-phoenix_180215_v6.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Olajire A. A. Valorization of greenhouse carbon dioxide emissions into value-added products by catalytic processes. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2013:3–4:74–92. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.10.00410.1016/j.jcou.2013.10.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.10.00410.1016/j.jcou.2013.10.004</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] European Biofuels Technology Platform. Biomass with CO2 Capture and Storage (Bio-CCS). The way forward for Europe. Oslo: Bellona, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] IEA. Putting CO2 to Use. Creating value from emissions. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] EU Open Data Portal. CORDIS - EU research projects under Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) [Online]. [Accessed 15.10.2020]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/cordisH2020projects
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Cascio E. L., et al. Key performance indicators for integrated natural gas pressure reduction stations with energy recovery. Energy Conversion and Management 2018:164:219–229. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.08910.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.089" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.08910.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.089</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Pacheco K. A., et al. Multi criteria decision analysis for screening carbon dioxide conversion products. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2021:43:101391. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10139110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101391" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10139110.1016/j.jcou.2020.101391</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Chauvy R., et al. Comparison of multi-criteria decision-analysis methods for selecting carbon dioxide utilization products. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2020:24:194–210. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.00210.1016/j.spc.2020.07.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.00210.1016/j.spc.2020.07.002</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Styring P., et al. Carbon Capture and Utilisation in the green economy. Using CO2 to manufacture fuel, chemicals and materials. United Kingdom: CO2Chem Publishing, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Wang R., Peng B., Huang K. The research progress of CO2 sequestration by algal bio-fertilizer in China. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2015:11:67–70. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.00710.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.00710.1016/j.jcou.2015.01.007</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] I-PHYC project [Online]. [Accessed 16.11.2020]. Available: https://i-phyc.com/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Anto S., et al. Algae as green energy reserve: Technological outlook on biofuel production. Chemosphere 2020:242:125079. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12507910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12507931678847" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12507910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12507931678847</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Romagnoli F., et al. Novel Stacked Modular Open Raceway Ponds for Microalgae Biomass Cultivation in Biogas Plants: Preliminary Design and Modelling. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):1–19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-005010.2478/rtuect-2020-0050" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-005010.2478/rtuect-2020-0050</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Pastare L., Romagnoli F. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Biogas Production from Cerathophyllum demersum, Fucus vesiculosus and Ulva intestinalis in Latvian Conditions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):258– 271. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-006710.2478/rtuect-2019-0067" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-006710.2478/rtuect-2019-0067</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Ievina B., Romagnoli F. Potential of Chlorella Species as Feedstock for Bioenergy Production: A Review. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):203–220. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-006710.2478/rtuect-2020-0067" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-006710.2478/rtuect-2020-0067</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Drägerwerk AG & Co KGaA. Reliable CO2 monitoring in the beverage industry. Technical Paper. Germany: Drägerwerk AG & Co KGaA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Nerantzis E., et al. Winemaking process engineering: On line fermentation monitoring - Sensors and equipment. e-Journal of Science & Technology 2007:29–36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Sanjeev K., Ramesh M. N. Low Oxygen and Inert Gas Processing of Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2007:46(5):423–451. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1040839050021567010.1080/1040839050021567016891213" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/1040839050021567010.1080/1040839050021567016891213</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Ghiat I., et al. CO2 utilisation in agricultural greenhouses: A novel ‘plant to plant’ approach driven by bioenergy with carbon capture systems within the energy, water and food Nexus. Environmental Conversion and Management 2021:228:1136668. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11366810.1016/j.enconman.2020.113668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11366810.1016/j.enconman.2020.113668</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Zhang X., et al. CFD Modelling of Finned-tube CO2 Gas Cooler for Refrigeration Systems. Energy Procedia 2019:161:275–282. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.09210.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.092" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.09210.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.092</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Zhang Z., et al. Simulation and techno-economic assessment of bio-methanol production from pine biomass, biochar and pyrolysis oil. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2021:44:101002. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.10100210.1016/j.seta.2021.101002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.10100210.1016/j.seta.2021.101002</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 243 - 253
Published on: Jun 20, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
CO utilisation,
decarbonization,
key performance indicators,
multi-criteria analysis,
rural development
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Viktorija Terjanika, Julija Gusca, Jelena Pubule, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article