Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Life Cycle Assessment-Based Approach to Forecast the Response of Waste Management Policy Targets to the Environment Cover

Life Cycle Assessment-Based Approach to Forecast the Response of Waste Management Policy Targets to the Environment

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. [1] Eurostat. Recycling rates of municipal waste EU 2016–2018 [Online]. [Accessed 10.10.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/bookmark/b0146e61-8785-421e-a442-9e3a42de4e85?lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Eurostat. Landfill / Disposal rate in kg per capita [Online]. [Accessed 10.10.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/bookmark/ee6a17d2-0b8f-4a03-b358-bb37361fa627?lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Geng Y., Tsuyoshi F., Chen X. Evaluation of innovative municipal solid waste management through urban symbiosis: a case study of Kawasaki. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010:18(10–11):993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.00310.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Suna Erses Yay A. Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015:94:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.08910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development. National Waste Management Plan of Latvia 2013–2020, 2013. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] The Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030. Riga: Saeima of the republic of Latvia, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] EU Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste. Official Journal of the European Union 1999:L182/1–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] EU Council Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union 2008:3–30.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Weidema B., et al. The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Environ News 2004:70:46.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Fernández-González J. M., et al. Economic and environmental review of Waste-to-Energy systems for municipal solid waste management in medium and small municipalities. Waste Management 2017:67:360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.00310.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.00328501263
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Center. 3A Waste – data entry for the report for 2017. Riga: Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] EUR-Lex. Proposal for a EU Council Directive of the EP and of the Council amending Directives 2008/98/EC on waste, 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment. [Online]. [Accessed 10.10.2019]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52014PC0397
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Mustafa M. Y., Calay R. K., Román E. Biogas from Organic Waste - A Case Study. Procedia Engineering 2016:146:310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.397">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.39710.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.397
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Kavals E., et al. Indicator analysis of integrated municipal waste management system. Case study of Latvia. Energy Procedia 2018:147:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.086">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.08610.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.086
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre. Valsts statistiskas pārskata ‘Nr.3-Atkritumi – pārskats par atkritumiem’ datu apkopojums par 2016. gadu (Summary of the National Statistical Report ‘No.3 – Waste – Overview of Waste’ for 2016.). Riga: Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, 2017. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] GETLIŅI EKO Ltd. Assessment of the volume and composition of imported waste. Confidential information, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] GETLIŅI EKO Ltd. Energy production [Online]. [Accessed 14.04.2020]. Available: https://www.getlini.lv/lv/enerģija
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Palanivel T. M., Sulaiman H. Generation and Composition of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. APCBEE Procedia 2014:10:96–102.10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.10.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Nabavi-Pelesaraei A., et al. Prognostication of energy use and environmental impacts for recycle system of municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:154:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.033">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.03310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Kulczycka J., et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management – Comparison of Results Using Different LCA Models. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2015:24:125–140. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/26960">https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/2696010.15244/pjoes/26960
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] ZAAO Ltd. Waste report in 2016 for landfill site ‘Daibe’. Valsts statistiskas pārskata ‘Nr.3-Atkritumi – pārskats par atkritumiem’ par 2016. gadu atkritumu poligonā ‘Daibe’ (Summary of the National Statistical Report ‘No.3 - Waste -Overview of Waste’ for 2016.). Riga: Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, 2016. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Geo Consultants Ltd. Ietekmes uz vidi novērtējums - sadzīves atkritumu poligonam ‘GRANTIŅI’ Bauskas un Iecavas novados. (Environmental impact assessment – for municipal waste landfill ‘GRANTIŅI’ in Bauska un Iecava municipalities.) Riga: Geo Consultants, 2017. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Arunbabu V., Indu K. S., Ramasamy E. V. Leachate pollution index as an effective tool in determining the phytotoxicity of municipal solid waste leachate. Waste Management 2017:68:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.01210.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.01228736051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] De Albuquerque E. M., et al. Treatability of landfill leachate combined with sanitary sewage in an activated sludge system. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2018:23:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.03.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.03.01110.1016/j.jwpe.2018.03.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Penza M., et al. A case-study of microsensors for landfill air-pollution monitoring applications. Urban Climate 2015:14:351–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.00210.1016/j.uclim.2014.09.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] European Commission. Review of Waste Policy and Legislation (2017) [Online]. [Accessed 24.06.2020]. Available: http://EcEuropaEu/Environment/Waste/Target_reviewHtm
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Clavreul J., Guyonnet D., Christensen T. H. Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Management 2012:32:2482–2495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.00810.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.00822863069
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Eurostat. Population on 1st January by age, sex and type of projection (2015) [Online]. [Accessed 24.06.2020]. Available: http://AppssoEurostatEcEuropaEu/Nui/ShowDo?Dataset=proj_15npms&lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Area, population density and number of long-term residents in regions, republic cities and municipalities at the beginning of the year (2017) [Online]. [Accessed 16.10.2019]. Available: http://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/iedz/iedz__iedzskaits__ikgad/ISG050.px/table/tableViewLayout1/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Brussels: European Commission, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Ham Y. J., et al. The valuation of landfill disamenities in Birmingham. Ecological Economics 2013:85:116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.00610.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Cremiato R., et al. Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production. Renewable Energy 2018:124:180– 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.033">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.03310.1016/j.renene.2017.06.033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Michael H., Ralph K. R., Stig I. O. Life cycle assessment. Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products Processes and Services. Life cycle impact assesment. [Online]. [Accessed 27.06.2020]. Available: https://www.ciraig.org/pdf/5a-CIRAIG_PERF_MMargni_PERF_LCIAc.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Jolliet O., Margni M. IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2003:8:324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0297850510.1007/BF02978505
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Yin S., Tuladhar R., Riella J., Chung D., Collister T., Combe M., Sivakugan N., Comparative evaluation of virgin and recycled polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2016:114:134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.162">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.162
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Ikhlayel M. Development of management systems for sustainable municipal solid waste in developing countries: a systematic life cycle thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:180:571–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.057">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.05710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.057
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Giusti L. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Management 2009:29(8):2227–2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.02810.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.02819401266
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Premakumara D. G. J., et al. Reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) from municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in the Philippines: Rapid review and assessment. Waste Management 2018:80:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.036">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.03610.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.03630455021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Linzalone N., et al. Participatory health impact assessment used to support decision-making in waste management planning: A replicable experience from Italy. Waste Management 2017:59:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.035">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.03510.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.03527729197
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Smith A., et al. Waste management options and climate change: Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Abingdon: AEA Technology, 2001. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/climate_change.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Aparcana S. Approaches to formalization of the informal waste sector into municipal solid waste management systems in low- and middle-income countries: Review of barriers and success factors. Waste Management 2017:61:593–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.028">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.02810.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.02828038906
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia. Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas valsts plāns 2021.–2028. gadam. (Draft plan ‘National Waste Management Plan for Latvia for 2021 to 2028’.) Riga: VARAM, 2020. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste. Official Journal of the European Union 1994:L 365.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] EU Council Directive 2019/904 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Official Journal of the European Union 2019:L 155/1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] ZAAO Ltd. Landfill gas management [Online]. [Accessed 17.11.2019]. Available: http://www.zaao.lv/en/content/landfill-gas-management
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Energy report of Latvia, in natural units of measurement (NACE 2) - data on municipal waste incineration and generated thermal energy and electricity in 2016 [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2018]. Available: https://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/vide/vide__energetika__ikgad/ENG010.px/table/tableViewLayout1/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Jelgava Regional Environmental Board. Permit for A Category Pollutant Activity for ‘Zemgales EKO’ Ltd. 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] ZAAO Enerģija Ltd. Data on heat and electricity produced in 2015 at landfill ‘DAIBE’ [Online]. [Accessed 20.04.2020]. Available: http://www.zaao.lv/lv/saturs/paveiktais
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Valmiera Regional Environmental Board. Permit for A Category Pollutant Activity No. VA09IA0003, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] ZEMGALES EKO Ltd. Landfill Report in 2016 for landfill sites ‘Brakšķi’ and ‘Grantiņi’. Valsts statistiskas pārskata ‘Nr.3-Atkritumi – pārskats par atkritumiem’ par 2016. gadu atkritumu poligonos ‘Brakšķi’ un ‘Grantiņi’ (Summary of the National Statistical Report ‘No.3 – Waste – Overview of Waste’ for 2016.). Riga: Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, 2016. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] LIEPĀJAS RAS Ltd. Landfill Report in 2016 for landfill site ‘Ķīvītes’. Valsts statistiskas pārskata ‘Nr.3-Atkritumi – pārskats par atkritumiem’ par 2016. gadu atkritumu poligonā ‘Ķīvītes’ (Summary of the National Statistical Report ‘No.3 - Waste - Overview of Waste’ for 2016.). Riga: Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un meteoroloģijas centrs, 2016. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Bisinella V., et al. Importance of waste composition for Life Cycle Assessment of waste management solutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:164:1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.01310.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] Getliņi EKO Ltd. Sia ‘Getliņi Eko’ Gada pārskats par 2016. gadu (Waste report 2016 in landfill site ‘Getliņi’). Getliņi Eko, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Nelles M., Grünes J., Morscheck G. Waste Management in Germany – Development to a Sustainable Circular Economy? Procedia Environmental Science 2016:35:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.00110.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Madona Regional Environmental Board. Atkritumu pārskats par 2016. gadu. (Waste report for 2016.). Madona, 2016. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Eurostat. Metodology: Municipal waste generation and treatment, by type of treatment method [Online]. [Accessed 10.11.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Municipal_waste_statistics#Municipal_waste_treatment
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] EPA Victoria. Air Emissions from Non-Hazardous Air Emissions from Non-Hazardous Waste Landfills – Update of 2013 Literature Review. Carlton: EPA Victoria and the Department of Health and Human Services, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Beck-Broichsitter S., Gerke H. H., Horn R. Assessment of Leachate Production from a Municipal Solid-Waste Landfill through Water-Balance Modeling. Geosciences 2018:8(10):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8100372">https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences810037210.3390/geosciences8100372
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. [61] The European Environment Agency. Diversion of waste from landfill. [Online]. [Accessed 16.10.2019]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/diversion-from-landfill/assessment
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. [62] Eurostat. Municipal waste by waste management operations. [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/bookmark/6fb2a67e-79ac-4a62-929d-07af8ab0cfc5?lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. [63] Eurostat. Recycling rates for packaging waste. [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/bookmark/59bc70cd-bf6d-4147-a5d1-5174133dcd7b?lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. [64] Slagstad H., Brattebø H. Influence of assumptions about household waste composition in waste management LCAs. Waste Management 2013:33(1):212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.02010.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.02023117136
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 135
Published on: Mar 23, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Circular economy,
National targets,
Policy decision-making tool
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Edgars Kavals, Julija Gusca, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)Next article