Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessed Cross Laminated Timber in Latvia
References
- [1] M. Lavagna
et al. Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock.Build. Environ. 2018:145:260–275.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008 - [2] Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions On Resource Efficiency Opportunities In The Building Sector. Brussels: European Commission, 2014.
- [3] Müller H. S., Haist M., Vogel M. Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime.
Constr. Build. Mater. 2014:67(C):321–337.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039 - [4] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Life Cycle Assessment of Cross-Laminated Timber Produced in Canada. Ottawa: Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2013.
- [5] IEA. Global cement production, 2010-2019 – Charts – Data & Statistics - IEA [Online]. [Accessed 30.10.2020]. Available:
https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-cement-production-2010-2019 - [6] Wood Based Panel Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2018-2025 [Online]. [Accessed 09.02.2021]. Available:
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/wood-based-panel-market - [7] Panels & Furniture Asia May/Jun 2020 [Online]. [Accessed: 28.10.2020]. Available:
http://www.panelsfurnitureasia.com/ebook/PFA_MayJun2020/index.html - [8] Cherry R.,
et al . Out-of-grade sawn pine: A state-of-the-art review on challenges and new opportunities in cross laminated timber (CLT).Constr. Build. Mater. 2019:211:858–868.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.293">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.293 - [9] Hildebrandt J., Hagemann N., Thrän D. The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in europe.
Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017:34:405–418.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013 - [10] Jayalath A.,
et al. Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia.Energy Build. 2020:223:110091.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091 - [11] Hemström K., Mahapatra K., Gustavsson L. Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings.
Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011:55(11):1013–1021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.012 - [12] Cabinet of Ministers. Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 333: Noteikumi par Latvijas būvnormatīvu LBN 201-15 “Būvju ugunsdrošība” (Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 333: Regulations on the Latvian construction standard LBN 201-15 “Fire safety of buildings”).
Latvijas Vēstnesis 2015. (in Latvian) - [13] OECD.
How’s Life? Measuring well-being . Paris: OECD, 2017. - [14] Barboutis I. Kamperidou V. Properties of two different thicknesses 3-ply plywood of tree-of-heaven veneers.
Proceedings of the 22nd Int. Sci. Conf. Wood is Good - EU Preaccession Challenges Sect. Proc. 2011:6–19. - [15] Chen C. X., Pierobon F., Ganguly I. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) produced in Western Washington: The role of logistics and wood species mix.
Sustain. 2019:11(5):1278.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051278">https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051278 - [16] Guardigli L., Monari F., Bragadin M. A. Assessing environmental impact of green buildings through LCA methods: A comparison between reinforced concrete and wood structures in the European context.
Procedia Eng. 2011:21:1119–1206.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2131">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2131 - [17] Passarelli R. N. Environmental Benefits of Reusable Modular Mass Timber Construction for Residential use in Japan: an LCA Approach.
Modul. Offsite Constr. Summit Proc. 2019:2017:157–164.https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs89">https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs89 - [18] Giels E.
Cross laminated timber panels . Oslo: Epd-Norge, No. 2017. - [19] Sathre R., González-García S. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of wood-based building materials. Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Eco-Labelling and Case Studies. Woodhead Publishing, 2014:331–337.
https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.311">https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.311 - [20] Tubert-Brohman I., Sherman W., Repasky M., Beuming T. Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013:53(9):1689–1699.https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400128m">https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400128m - [21] Ichimura M.,
et al. Eco-efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-use Efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on the Environment. Bangkok: United Nations publication, 2009.
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 70
Published on: Feb 24, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Ilze Vamza, Fabian Diaz, Peteris Resnais, Antra Radziņa, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.