Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are Industries Open for Renewable Energy? Cover

Are Industries Open for Renewable Energy?

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)
By: Edgars Kudurs,  Anrijs Tukulis,  Arnis Dzalbs and  Dagnija Blumberga  
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. [1] Data & Statistics – IEA [Online]. [Accessed 09.05.2020]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=CoalProdByType
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of European Union 2009:L 140/16.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of European Union 2018:L 328/82.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Commission. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions The European Green Deal COM/2019/640 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] The Global Risks Report 2020 | World Economic Forum, 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 27.04.2020]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. ENG090. Elektriskā jauda un saražotā elektroenerģija no atjaunīgiem energoresursiem (Electric power and electricity produced from renewable energy sources) [Online]. [Accessed 03.09.2020]. Available: http://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/vide/vide__energetika__ikgad/ENG090.px/table/tableViewLayout1/ (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] European Environmental Agency. Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in Europe — European Environment Agency. 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 13.03.2020]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energy-consumption-4/assessment-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Cabinet of Ministers. Par Latvijas Nacionālo enerģētikas un klimata plānu 2021.–2030. gadam. (On the Latvian National Energy and Climate Plan 2021–2030 year). Riga: Cabinet of Ministers, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Meža platība Latvijā turpina pieaugt – pērn tie bija 52 % (Forest area in Latvia continues to grow - last year they were 52%), 2019. [Online]. [Accessed 13.03.2020]. Available: https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/meza-platiba-latvijaturpina-pieaugt--pern-tie-bija-52.a325062/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Fraunhofer ISE. Photovoltaics Report. Freiburg: Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] REN21 - 2019 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Briede A. Klimats Latvijā – Nacionālā Enciklopēdija (Climate in Latvia - National Encyclopedia), 2019. [Online]. [Accessed 12.01.2020]. Available: https://enciklopedija.lv/skirklis/26052-klimats-Latvijā (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Blumberga A., et al. Atjaunojamās elektroenerģijas akumulācija (Accumulation of renewable electricity.). Riga: RTU, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Global Solar Atlas 2.0. [Online]. [Accessed 12.01.2020]. Available: https://globalsolaratlas.info/map
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Letcher T. M. Wind Energy Engineering: A Handbook for Onshore and Offshore Wind Turbines. Elsevier, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00001-110.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00001-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Âboltiņš R. Vēja enerģijas izmantošanu ietekmējošo faktoru analīze un iespējamie risinājumi (Analysis of factors influencing wind energy use and possible solutions.). 2019. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] IRENA. Geothermal energy [Online]. [Accessed 13.01.2020]. Available: https://irena.org/geothermal
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] LVĢMC. Ģeotermālie resursi (Geothermal resources) [Online]. [Accessed 12.05.2020]. Available: https://www.meteo.lv/lapas/geologija/zemes-dzilu-resursi/perspektivie-resursi/geotermalie-resursi/geotermalieresursi?id=1488&nid=496 (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Ezici B., Egilmez G., Gedik R. Assessing the eco-efficiency of U.S. manufacturing industries with a focus on renewable vs. non-renewable energy use: An integrated time series MRIO and DEA approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:253:119630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11963010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119630
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] IRENA. Bioenergy [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2020]. Available: https://www.irena.org/bioenergy
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N. The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? Energy Policy 1994:22(10):804–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-410.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Shmelev S. E., Van Den Bergh J. C. J. M. Optimal diversity of renewable energy alternatives under multiple criteria: An application to the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:60:679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.10010.1016/j.rser.2016.01.100
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Maletič D., et al. Analytic Hierarchy Process Application in Different Organisational Settings. Applications and Theory of Analytic Hierarchy Process - Decision Making for Strategic Decisions. InTechOpen, 2016. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/applications-and-theory-of-analytic-hierarchy-process-decision-making-for-strategic-decisions/analytic-hierarchy-process-application-in-different-organisational-settings10.5772/64511
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Saaty T. L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1977:15(3):234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-510.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Cabala P. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Evaluating Decision Alternatives. Oper. Res. Decis. 2010:20(1):5–23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Lee H. C., Ter Chang C. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:92:883–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.00710.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Haddad B., Liazid A., Ferreira P. A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renewable Energy 2017:107:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.03510.1016/j.renene.2017.01.035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Wang J. J., et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009:13(9):2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.02110.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Mulliner E., Malys N., Maliene V. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega 2016:59(B):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.01310.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Strantzali E., Aravossis K. Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:55:885–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.02110.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0115 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 447 - 456
Published on: Dec 14, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP),
enterprise survey,
multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA),
renewable energy sources (RES),
technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Edgars Kudurs, Anrijs Tukulis, Arnis Dzalbs, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)Next article