Top Energy Saver of the Year: Results of an Energy Saving Competition in Public Buildings
References
- [1] EU Buildings Database [Online]. [Accessed 15.09.2020] Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/eu-buildings-database_en
- [2] Jimenez-Bescos C., Oregi X. Implementing User Behaviour on Dynamic Building Simulations for Energy Consumption. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):308–318. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009710.2478/rtuect-2019-0097
- [3] Andor M. A., Fels K. M. Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation – A Systematic Review of Non-price Interventions and Their Causal Effects. Ecological Economics 2018:148:178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.01810.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.018
- [4] Barbu A.-D., Griffiths N., Morton G. Achieving energy efficiency through behaviour change: what does it take? EEA technical report. Publications Office of the EU, Copenhagen, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2800/49941
- [5] Staddon S. C., et al. Intervening to change behaviour and save energy in the workplace: A systematic review of available evidence. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:17:30–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.02710.1016/j.erss.2016.03.027
- [6] Bull R., Janda K. B. Beyond feedback: introducing the ‘engagement gap’ in organizational energy management. Building Research & Information 2018:46:300–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.136674810.1080/09613218.2017.1366748
- [7] Gustafson C., Longland M. Engaging Employees in Conservation Leadership. Proceedings of the 2008 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 2008:134–147.
- [8] Metzger I., Kandt A., VanGeet O. Plug Load Behavioral Change Demonstration Project. NREL Technical Report. US: NREL, 2011.10.2172/1023720
- [9] Murtagh N., et al. Individual energy use and feedback in an office setting: A field trial. Energy Policy 2013:62:717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.09010.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.090
- [10] Dixon G. N., et al. Using Comparative Feedback to Influence Workplace Energy Conservation: A Case Study of a University Campaign. Environment and Behavior 2015:47: 667–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391651352041710.1177/0013916513520417
- [11] Petersen J. E., et al. Electricity and Water Conservation on College and University Campuses in Response to National Competitions among Dormitories: Quantifying Relationships between Behavior, Conservation Strategies and Psychological Metrics. PLOS ONE 2015:10:0144070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.014407010.1371/journal.pone.0144070468765526672599
- [12] Vine E. L., Jones C. M. Competition, carbon, and conservation: Assessing the energy savings potential of energy efficiency competitions. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:19:158–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.01310.1016/j.erss.2016.06.013
- [13] Vadovics E., et al. save@work Evaluation Report: Lessons learnt for future sustainable energy projects aiming to change everyday behaviour. 2017.
- [14] R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [Online]. [Accessed 21.09.2020]. Available: https://www.r-project.org
Language: English
Page range: 278 - 293
Published on: Dec 14, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2020 Jan Kaselofsky, Ralf Schüle, Marika Rošā, Toms Prodaņuks, Anda Jekabsone, Edina Vadovics, Kristóf Vadovics, Thekla Heinel, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.