Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Characterisation of Electrochemical Sensor-Array for Utilisation in Construction of BOD Bioelectronic Tongue Cover

Characterisation of Electrochemical Sensor-Array for Utilisation in Construction of BOD Bioelectronic Tongue

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)
By: Kätlin Pitman,  Jaak Nerut,  Merlin Raud and  Timo Kikas  
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. [1] Jouanneau S., et al. Rapid BOD assessment with a microbial array coupled to a neural machine learning system. Water Research 2017:166:115079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.11507910.1016/j.watres.2019.115079
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Rocha-Meneses L., et al. Thermodynamic, Environmental and Economic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery: Terceira Island Case Study. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23:2:347–365. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-007310.2478/rtuect-2019-0073
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Li Y., et al. A Rapid and Sensitive BOD Biosensor Based on Ultramicroelectrode Array and Carboxyl Graphene. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems 2017.10.1109/NEMS.2017.8017024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Pitman K., Raud M., Kikas T. Biochemical oxygen demand sensor arrays. Agronomy Research 2015:13:2:382–395.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Raud M., Kikas T. Bioelectronic tongue and multivariate analysis: A next step in BOD measurements. Water Research 2013:47:2555–2562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.02610.1016/j.watres.2013.02.026
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Ejeian F., et al. Biosensors for wastewater monitoring: A review. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2018:118:66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.07.01910.1016/j.bios.2018.07.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Commault A. S., et al. Geobacter-dominated biofilms used as amperometric BOD sensors. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2016:109:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.01.01110.1016/j.bej.2016.01.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Raud M. Study of semi-specific BOD biosensors for Biosensor-array. Tartu: University of Tartu, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Cêbere B., et al. Toxicity Tests for Ensuring Succesful Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2010:3(3):47. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-009-0005-810.2478/v10145-009-0005-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Kim B. H., Chang I. S., Moon H. Microbial Fuel Cell-Type Biochemical Oxygen Demand Sensor. Encyclopedia of Sensors X 2006:1–12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Kibena E., et al. Semi-specific Microbacterium phyllosphaerae-based microbial sensor for biochemical oxygen demand measurements in dairy wastewater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2012:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1166-810.1007/s11356-012-1166-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Liu J., Mattiasson B. Microbial BOD sensors for wastewater analysis. Water Research 2002:36(15):3786–3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00101-x10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00101-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Bourgeois W., Burgess J. E., Stuetz R. M. Review On-line monitoring of wastewater quality: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2001:76:337–348.10.1002/jctb.393
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Morris K., et al. Ferricyanide mediated biochemical oxygen demand – development of a rapid biochemical oxygen demand assay. Analytica Chimica Acta 2001:442:129–139.10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01133-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Liu C., et al. Immobilized multi-species based biosensor for rapid biochemical oxygen demand measurement. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2011:26(5):2074–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.09.00410.1016/j.bios.2010.09.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Lin L., et al. Novel BOD optical fiber biosensor based on co-immobilized microorganisms in ormosils matrix. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2006:21(9):1703–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2005.08.00710.1016/j.bios.2005.08.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Liu J., Björnsson L., Mattiasson B. Immobilised activated sludge based biosensor for biochemical oxygen demand measurement. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2000:14(12):883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-5663(99)00064-010.1016/S0956-5663(99)00064-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Webber J. B, et al. Appraising bacterial strains for rapid BOD sensing – an empirical test to identify bacterial strains capable of reliably predicting real effluent BODs. Applied Microbiological Biotechnology 2011:89:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2889-410.1007/s00253-010-2889-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] APHA, Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association: Washington 1985:525–531.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Strade E., Kalnina D. Cost Effective Method for Toxicity Screening of Pharmaceutical Wastewater Containing Inorganic Salts and Harmful Organic Compounds. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):52–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-000410.2478/rtuect-2019-0004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Chan C., et al. Designing an amperometric thick-film microbial BOD sensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2000:15:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-5663(00)00090-710.1016/S0956-5663(00)00090-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Wang J., et al. Ultramicroelectrode array modified with magnetically labelled Bacillus subtilis, palladium nanoparticles and reduced carboxy graphene for amperometric determination of biochemical oxygen demand. Microchim Acta 2017:184:763–771.10.1007/s00604-016-2055-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Raud M., et al. Utilization potential of urban greening waste: Tartu case-study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2017:21:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.01410.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Raud M., Olt J., Kikas T. N2 explosive decompression pretreatment of biomass for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass & Bioenergy 2016:90:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.03410.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Lei H., Yi L. A novel BOD sensor immobilized active sludge bacteria for rapid determination of biochemical oxygen demand in industrial wastewater. International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET.2009.33110.1109/ICEET.2009.331
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Tan T. C., Wu C. BOD sensors using multi-species living or thermally killed cells of a BODSEED microbial culture. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 1999:54(3):252–260.10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00113-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0084 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 54
Published on: Dec 14, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Biochemical oxygen demand,
biosensor,
BOD,
BOD sensor-array
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Kätlin Pitman, Jaak Nerut, Merlin Raud, Timo Kikas, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)Next article