Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Education for Advancing the Implementation of the Bioeconomy Goals: An Analysis of Master Study Programmes in Bioeconomy Cover

Education for Advancing the Implementation of the Bioeconomy Goals: An Analysis of Master Study Programmes in Bioeconomy

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 2 (September 2020)
By: Jelena Pubule,  Andra Blumberga,  Stelios Rozakis,  Anita Vecina,  Antra Kalnbalkite and  Dagnija Blumberga  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. [1] European Commission. 2018. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2020]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0673
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Levidow L., Birch K., Papaioannou T. Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values 2012:38(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391243814310.1177/0162243912438143
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Anghel I., Siminica M., Cristea M., Noja G. G., Sichigea M. Bioeconomy credentials and intellectual capital: a comparative modelling approach for the E.U.-13 and E.U.-15 2019. Economic Research 2019:32(1):2699–2722. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.165321210.1080/1331677X.2019.1653212
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Bildirici M., Ozaksoy F. An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries. Economic Research 2018:31(1):386–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.142761010.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Braha K., Qineti A., Serences R. Innovation and economic growth: The case of Slovakia. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development 2015:4(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2015-000210.1515/vjbsd-2015-0002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Zilberman D., Gordon B., Hochman G., Wesseler J. Economics of sustainable development and the bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 2018:40(1):22–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx05110.1093/aepp/ppx051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Fonseca S. C., Pinheiro R., Barbosa C., Araujo A., Vaz-Velho M., Alves R. Food innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: A case study. International Journal of Food Studies 2015:4(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a310.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Urmetzer S., Pyka A. Varieties of knowledge-based bioeconomies. In Dabbert S., Lewandowski I., Weiss J., Pyka A. Knowledge-driven developments in the bioeconomy. Economic complexity and evolution. Springer 2017:57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-710.1007/978-3-319-58374-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] European Commission. 2019. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. The European green deal. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Golembiewski B., Sick N., Bröring S. The emerging research landscape on bioeconomy: what has been done so far and what is essential from a technology and innovation management perspective? Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2015:29:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.006.10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Van Lancker J., Wauters E., Van Huylenbroeck G. Managing innovation in the bioeconomy: An open innovation perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy 2016:90:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.01710.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Lozano R. Carpenter A., Satric V. Fostering green chemistry through a collaborative business model: A Chemical Leasing case study from Serbia. Resource Conservation, Recycling 2013:78:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Marcon A., Fleith de Medeiros, J., Duarte Ribeiro J. L. Innovation and environmentally sustainable economy: Identifying the best practices developed by multinationals in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:160:83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Montalvo C. Sustainable production and consumption systems - cooperation for change: assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies. The case of the In-Bond industry in northern Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production 2003:11(4):411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00063-X10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00063-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Montalvo C. General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: a survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008:16(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Zailani S., Jeyaraman K., Vengadasan G., Premkumar R. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. International Journal of Production Economics 2012:140(1):330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.00810.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Chen Y. S. The driver of green innovation and green image - green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics 2007: 81(3):531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-110.1007/s10551-007-9522-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Chen Y. S. The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2008:77:271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-110.1007/s10551-006-9349-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Chen Y. S., Chang C. H. The determinants of green product development performance: green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics 2013:116(1):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Caniglia G., Luederitz C., Groß M., Muhr M., John B., Withycombe Keeler L., Wehrden H., Laubichler M., Wiek A., Lang D. Transnational collaboration for sustainability in higher education: Lessons from a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:168:764–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.25610.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.256
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ardoin N. M., Bowers A. W., Gaillard E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation 2020:241:108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.10822410.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Thurer M., Tomasevic I., Stevenson M., Qu T., Huisingh D. A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:181:608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.13010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.130
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Schutte G. What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? New Biotechnology 2018:40(A):82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00328458016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Wydra S. Measuring innovation in the bioeconomy – Conceptual discussion and empirical experiences. Technology in Society 2020:61:101242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Ribeiro G., Cherobim A. P. Environment and innovation: discrepancy between theory and research practice. RAI Revista de Administracao e Inovacao 2017:14(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.10.00210.1016/j.rai.2016.10.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Drejerska N. Employment in vs. Education for the bioeconomy. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017. November 2017, Kaunas, Lithuania.10.15544/RD.2017.245
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Lang D. J., Wiek A., Bergmann M., Stauffacher M., Martens P., Moll P., Swilling M., Thomas C. J. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 2012:7:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Segalas J., Ferrer-Balas D., Mulder K. F. What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010:18(3):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.01210.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Tejedor G., Segalas J., Rosas-Casals M. Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:175:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.08510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Lambrechts W., Mula I., Ceulemans K., Molderez I. The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programmes in management. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:48:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.03410.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Wiek A., Withycombe L., Redman C. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic programme development. Sustainable Science 2011:6:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-610.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Lask J., Maier J., Tchouga B., Vargas-Carpintero R. The bioeconomist. In: Lewandowski I. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_12
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Repko A. F., Szostak R., Buchenberger M. P. Identifying relevant disciplines and gathering information about the problem. In: Introduction to interdisciplinary studies, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks: CA, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Barth M., Burandt S. Adding the “e-” to learning for sustainable development: challenges and innovation. Sustainability 2013:5:2609–2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su506260910.3390/su5062609
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Biobased materials. Master study programme description. Maastricht University [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/education/master/master-biobased-materials
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Bio Inspired innovation. Master study programme description. Utrecht University [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.uu.nl/masters/en/bio-inspired-innovation/study-programme
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Biobased Sciences and Biosystems Engineering (and Biotechnology). Master study programme description. Wageningen University and Research [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.wur.nl/en/Education-Programmes/master/MSc-programmes/MSc-Biobased-Sciences.htm.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Management of Bioeconomy, Innovation and Governance. Master study programme description. University of Edinburgh [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.ed.ac.uk/studying/postgraduate/degrees/index.php?r=site/view&edition=2020&id=769
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Industrial Biotechnology. Master study programme description. University of Strathclyde [Online]. [Accessed 01-March 2020]. Available: https://www.strath.ac.uk/courses/postgraduatetaught/industrialbiotechnology/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Bioeconomy. Master study programme description. The University of Hohenheim [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/en/bioeconomy-masters.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Forest Sciences. Master study programme description. University of Helsinki [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/admissions/degree-programmes/forest-sciences-masters-programme.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] European Forestry. Joint Master study programme description. University of Eastern Finland, AgroParisTech, University of Freiburg, University of Lleida, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Transilvania University of Braşov. [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/european-forestry-master-science-forestry
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] European Master in Bioeconomy in the Circular economy. Joint Master study programme description. University of Bologna, University of Milano-Bicocca, University of Naples Federico II, University of Turin [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: http://masterbiocirce.com/program-overview/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] European Master in Biological and Chemical Engineering for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Erasmus Mundus Joint Master study programme description. Paris Institute of Technology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Aalto University, Tallinn University of Technology, University of Liège [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: http://www.bioceb.eu/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] The MSc in Management of Bioeconomy, Innovation and Governance Programme Aims [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020].Available: http://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/gradschool/prospective/taught_masters/h_n/msc_management_bioeconomy_innovation_governance/programme_aims
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0062 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 149 - 159
Published on: Sep 23, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Sustainable higher education,
competences,
green innovation,
bioeconomy integration assessment
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Jelena Pubule, Andra Blumberga, Stelios Rozakis, Anita Vecina, Antra Kalnbalkite, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 2 (September 2020)Next article