Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Difference between Bibliometric and Grey Data. Transdisciplinary Bioeconomy Research Cover

Difference between Bibliometric and Grey Data. Transdisciplinary Bioeconomy Research

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. [1] European Commission. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. 2018.
  2. [2] Vivien F. D., Nieddu M., Befort N., Debref R., Giampietro M. The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics 2019:159:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.02710.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
  3. [3] Asada R., Sern T. Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World. Ecological Economics 2018:149:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.01410.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.014
  4. [4] Brunori G. Biomass, Biovalue and Sustainability: Some Thoughts on the Definition of the Bioeconomy. EuroChoices 2013:12(1):48–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.1202010.1111/1746-692X.12020
  5. [5] Diakosavvasi D., Frezal C. Bio–Economy and the sustainability of the agriculture and food system: opportunities and policy challenges. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/1815679710.1787/18156797
  6. [6] Lewandowski I. Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-810.1007/978-3-319-68152-8
  7. [7] Zihare L., Muizniece I., Blumberga D. A holistic vision of bioeconomy: The concept of transdisciplinarity nexus towards sustainable development. Agronomy Research 2019:17(5):2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.183
  8. [8] Pfau S. F., Hagens J. E., Dankbaar B., Smits A. J. M. Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability 2014:6:1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su603122210.3390/su6031222
  9. [9] Golembiewski B., Sick N., Bröring S. The emerging research landscape on bioeconomy: What has been done so far and what is essential from a technology and innovation management perspective? Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2015:29:308–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.00610.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.006
  10. [10] Haarich S., et al. Bioeconomy development in EU regions. Mapping of EU Member States’/regions’ Research and Innovation plans & Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3) on Bioeconomy for 2014–2020. Spatial Foresight, SWECO, OIR, t33, Nordregio, Berman Group, Infyde, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2777/84684
  11. [11] Schütte G. What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? New Biotechnology 2017:40(A):82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00328458016
  12. [12] Konstaninis A., Rozakis S., Efpraxia-Aithra M., Kesheng S. A Definition of Bioeconomy though the Bibliometrics Networks of the Scientific Literature. AgroBioForum 2018:21(2):64–85.
  13. [13] Muizniece I., Kubule A., Blumberga D. Towards understanding the transdisciplinary approach of the bioeconomy nexus. Energy Procedia 2018:147:75–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.05210.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.052
  14. [14] Lehtonen M. The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological Economics 2004:49(2):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.01910.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019
  15. [15] Bracco S., Tani A., Çalıcıoğlu Ö., Gomez San Juan M., Bogdanski A. Indicators to monitor and evaluate the sustainability of bioeconomy. Overview and a proposed way forward. Rome: FAO, 2019.
  16. [16] Ramcilovic-Suominen S., Pülzl H. Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:172(20):4170–4180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.15710.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
  17. [17] Bugge M., Hansen T., Klitkou A. What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability 2016:8(7):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su807069110.3390/su8070691
  18. [18] Mittra J., Zoukas G. Unpacking the Concept of Bioeconomy: Problems of Definition, Measurement, and the Attribution of Value. Science & Technology Studies 2020:33(1):2–21. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.6966210.23987/sts.69662
  19. [19] Sanz-Hernández A., Esteban E., Garrido P. Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:224:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.16810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168
  20. [20] Braun J. Bioeconomy – The global trend and its implications for sustainability and food security. Global Food Security 2018:19:81–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.00310.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.003
  21. [21] Urmetzer S., Lask J., Vargas-Carpintero R., Pyka A. Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy. Ecological Economics 2020:167:106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.10643510.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106435
  22. [22] Hasenheit M., Gerdes H., Kiresiewa Z., Beekman V. Summary report on the social, economic and environmental impacts of the bioeconomy. 2016.
  23. [23] Falcone P. M., Garcia S. G., Imbert E., Lijo L., Moirea M. T., Tani A., Tartiu V. E., Morone P. Transitioning towards the bio-economy: Assessing the social dimension through a stakeholder lens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2019:26(5):1135–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.179110.1002/csr.1791
  24. [24] Vainio A., Ovaska U., Varho V. Not so sustainable? Images of bioeconomy by future environmental professionals and citizens. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:210:1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.29010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.290
  25. [25] Wohlfahrt J., Ferchaud F., Gabrielle B., Godard C., Kurek B., Loyce C. Therond O. Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:232:898–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.38510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385
  26. [26] Sanz-Hernández A., Sanagustín-Fons M. V., López-Rodríguez M. E. A transition to an innovative and inclusive bioeconomy in Aragon, Spain. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2019:33:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.08.00310.1016/j.eist.2019.08.003
  27. [27] Pinto S., Albanese F., Dorso C. O., Balanzuela P. Quantifying time-dependent Media Agenda and public opinion by topic modelling. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2019:524:614–624.10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.108
  28. [28] McCombs M., Shaw D. L. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 1972:36(2):176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/26799010.1086/267990
  29. [29] Choi J., Han Y., Kim Y. A Research for Finding Relationship Between Mass Media and Social Media Based on Agenda Setting Theory. In: Lee R. (Eds.) Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham, 2016:654. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33903-0_810.1007/978-3-319-33903-0_8
  30. [30] Klašnja M., Barberá P., Beauchamp N., Nagler J., Tucker J. A. Measuring Public Opinion with Social Media Data. Oxford Handbooks Online, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190213299.013.310.1093/oxfordhb/9780190213299.013.3
  31. [31] Muizniece I., Zihare L., Blumberga D. Obtaining the factors affecting bioeconomy. Environmental and climate technologies 2019:23(1):277–291. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-001810.2478/rtuect-2019-0018
  32. [32] Podobnik V., Lovrek I. Implicit Social Networking: Discovery of Hidden Relationships, Roles and Communities among Consumers. Procedia Computer Science 2015:60:583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.18510.1016/j.procs.2015.08.185
  33. [33] Giurca A., Metz T. A social network analysis of Germany’s wood–based bioeconomy: Social capital and shared beliefs. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2018:26:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.00110.1016/j.eist.2017.09.001
  34. [34] Bauer F., Hansen T., Hellsmark H. Innovation in the bioeconomy – dynamics of biorefinery innovation networks. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2018:30(8):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.142538610.1080/09537325.2018.1425386
  35. [35] Adams J., Hilier-Brown C. H., Moore J. H., Lake A. A., Araujo-Soares V., White M., Summerbell C. Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies. Systematic Reviews 2016:5(164):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y504133627686611
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0058 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 114
Published on: Sep 23, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Indra Muizniece, Anna Kubule, Lauma Zihare, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.