Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Using Emissions Intensity to Better Track Energy Transitions Cover

Using Emissions Intensity to Better Track Energy Transitions

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. [1] Williams J. Global energy strategies. Futures 1978:10(4):293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(78)90034-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(78)90034-410.1016/0016-3287(78)90034-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bach W. Impact of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations on global climate: Potential consequences and corrective measures. Environment International 1979:2(4–6):215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(79)90004-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(79)90004-710.1016/0160-4120(79)90004-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Hayes D. The Coming Energy Transition. The Futurist 1977:11:303.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Kern F., Rogge K. S. The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes? Energy Research & Social Science 2016:22:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.01610.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Petit V. The Energy Transition. An Overview of the True Challenge of the 21st Century. Springer Int. Publishing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50292-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50292-210.1007/978-3-319-50292-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Fouquet R. Historical energy transitions: Speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:22:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.01410.1016/j.erss.2016.08.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Bromley P. S. Extraordinary interventions: Toward a framework for rapid transition and deep emission reductions in the energy space. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:22:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.01810.1016/j.erss.2016.08.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Chabrol M. Re-examining historical energy transitions and urban systems in Europe. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:13:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.01710.1016/j.erss.2015.12.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Sovacool B. K., Hess D. J. Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science 2017:47(5):703–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717709363">https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271770936310.1177/0306312717709363564804928641502
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Grubler A. Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy 2012:50:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.070">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.07010.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.070
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Wilson C., Grubler A. Lessons from the history of technological change for clean energy scenarios and policies. Natural Resources Forum 2011:35(3):165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.x10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Foxon T. J. A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics 2011:70(12):2258–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.01410.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Lane J. L., Smart S., Schmeda-Lopez D., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Garnett A., Greig C., McFarland E. Understanding constraints to the transformation rate of global energy infrastructure. WIREs Energy and Environment 2016:5(1):33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.177">https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.17710.1002/wene.177
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Hansen T., Coenen L. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2015:17:92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.00110.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Smil V. Examining energy transitions: A dozen insights based on performance. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:22:194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.01710.1016/j.erss.2016.08.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Fouquet R. The slow search for solutions: Lessons from historical energy transitions by sector and service. Energy Policy 2010:38(11):6586–6596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.02910.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Solomon B. D., Krishna K. The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook. Energy Policy 2011:39(11):7422–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.00910.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Sovacool B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:13:202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.02010.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Araújo K. The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science 2014:1:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.00210.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Rozentale L., Blumberga D. Methods to Evaluate Electricity Policy from Climate Perspective. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):131–147. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0060">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-006010.2478/rtuect-2019-0060
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Abdollahi H. Investigating Energy Use, Environment Pollution, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):275–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0016">https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-001610.2478/rtuect-2020-0016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Grubler A., Wilson C., Nemet G. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:22:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.015">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.01510.1016/j.erss.2016.08.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] International Energy Agency. World energy statistics. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2020]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/data-00510-en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Ministério de Minas e Energia. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. (Ministry of Mines and Energy. Brazilian Energy Balance). 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Wakiyama T., Zusman E., Monogan Iii J. E. Can a low-carbon-energy transition be sustained in post-Fukushima Japan? Assessing the varying impacts of exogenous shocks. Energy Policy 2014:73:654–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.01710.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Hermwille L. The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions – Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 2016:11:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.00110.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] International Energy Agency. Emissions per kWh of electricity and heat output. [Online]. [Accessed: 20.05.2020]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/data-00432-en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] International Energy Agency. CO2 emissions by product and flow [Online]. [Accessed: 20.05.2020]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/data-00430-en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Rogelj J., Luderer G., Pietzcker R. C., Kriegler E., Schaeffer M., Krey V., Riahi K. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nature Climatic Change 2015:5:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate257210.1038/nclimate2572
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Hirsh R. F., Jones C. F. History’s contributions to energy research and policy. Energy Research & Social Science 2014:1:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.01010.1016/j.erss.2014.02.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0042 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 681 - 690
Published on: Dec 14, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Climate change mitigation,
energy transition,
emissions intensity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Kelly D’alessandro, Paul Dargusch, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article