Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of the Overall Energy Efficiency for Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles and Electric Vehicles Cover

Comparison of the Overall Energy Efficiency for Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles and Electric Vehicles

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. [1] Council BE. World Energy Scenarios. World Energy Council, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bajcinovci B. Environment Quality: Impact From Traffic, Power Plant and Land Morphology, a Case Study of Prishtina. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-000610.1515/rtuect-2017-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Bariss U., Bazbauers G., Blumberga A., Blumberga D. System Dynamics Modeling of Households’ Electricity Consumption and Cost-Income Ratio: a Case Study of Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20(1):36–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-000910.1515/rtuect-2017-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Sutthichaimethee P., Ariyasajjakorn D. Forecast of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Consumption in Industry Sectors in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22:107–117. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-000710.2478/rtuect-2018-0007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Albatayneh A., Alterman D., Page A., Moghtaderi B. The Significance of Building Design for the Climate. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22:165–178. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-001110.2478/rtuect-2018-0011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Conti J., et al. International energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040. USDOE Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC (United States). Office of Energy Analysis, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Curran S. J. et al. Well-to-wheel analysis of direct and indirect use of natural gas in passenger vehicles. Energy 2014:75:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.03510.1016/j.energy.2014.07.035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Assis Brasil de W. N., et al. Energy and emission impacts of liquid fueled engines compared to electric motors for small size motorcycles based on the Brazilian scenario. Energy 2019:168:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.05110.1016/j.energy.2018.11.051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Van Vliet O., et al. Energy use, cost and CO2 emissions of electric cars. Journal of Power Sources 2011:196(4):2298–2310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.11910.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.119
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Travesset-Baro O., Rosas-Casals M., Jover E. Transport energy consumption in mountainous roads. A comparative case study for internal combustion engines and electric vehicles in Andorra. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2015:34:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.09.00610.1016/j.trd.2014.09.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Kosai S., Nakanishi M., Yamasue E. Vehicle energy efficiency evaluation from well-to-wheel lifecycle perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2018:65:355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.01110.1016/j.trd.2018.09.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Hekkert M. P., Hendriks F. H., Faaij A. P., Neelis M. L. Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development. Energy Policy 2005:33(5):579–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.01810.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Wang M. Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts. Journal of Power Sources 2002:112(1):307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00447-010.1016/S0378-7753(02)00447-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Stodolsky F., et al. Total fuel cycle impacts of advanced vehicles. SAE transactions 1999:444–459.10.4271/1999-01-0322
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Ou X. M., Zhang X. L., Chang S. Y. Life-cycle analysis of energy consumption, GHG emissions and regulated pollutants emissions of automotive fuel pathways in China. Bejing: Center of Automotive Energy Research Center, Tsinghua University, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Tobin J. Natural gas compressor stations on the interstate pipeline network: developments since 1996. Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas 2007:1–12.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Bureau C. S. China energy statistic yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistic Press, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Pamela L. S., Mann M. K., Kerr D. R. Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. U.S.: National Renewable Energy Lab., 1999. https://doi.org/10.2172/1210010.2172/12100
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] NETL. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity Rev. 2. Pittsburgh, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Torchio M. F., Santarelli M. G. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs–European market analysis. Energy 2010:35(10):4156–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.037.10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Torchio M. F., Santarelli M. G. Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs–European market analysis. Energy 2018:35(10):4156–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.03710.1016/j.energy.2010.06.037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Unnasch S., Browning L. Fuel Cycle Energy Conversion Efficiency Analysis. Status Report. CA: Air Resources Board, 2000.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Graus W., Worrell E. Trend in efficiency and capacity of fossil power generation in the EU. Energy Policy 2009:37(6):2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.034.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Tolmasquim M. Energia Renovável: hidráulica, biomassa, eólica, solar, oceânica, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Rosen M. A. Energy-and exergy-based comparison of coal-fired and nuclear steam power plants. Exergy, An International Journal 2001:1(3):180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-0235(01)00024-310.1016/S1164-0235(01)00024-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Edwards R., et al. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. SAE transactions 2004:1072–1084.10.4271/2004-01-1924
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Fioreze M. Montagem de dispositivos ópticos para obtenção de imagens por contraste de difração e atenuação para análise de incrustações de fosfato e oxalato de cálcio em superfícies de caldeiras. Installation of optical devices for obtaining images by diffraction contrast and attenuation for analysis of calcium phosphate and oxalate incrustations on boiler surfaces, 2016. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2019]. Available: http://dspace.unila.edu.br/123456789/637 (In Spanish).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Allik A., Märss M., Uiga J., Annuk, A. Optimization of the inverter size for grid-connected residential wind energy systems with peak shaving. Renewable Energy 2016:99:1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.01610.1016/j.renene.2016.08.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Pearsall N. The Performance of Photovoltaic (PV) Systems: Modelling, Measurement and Assessment. Woodhead Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02701-310.1016/C2014-0-02701-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Shipley M., et al. Combined heat and power: Effective energy solutions for a sustainable future. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2008.10.2172/1218492
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Linssen J., Bickert S., Hennings W. Netzintegration von Fahrzeugen mit elektrifizierten Antriebssystemen in bestehende und zukünftige Energieversorgungsstrukturen. Advances in Systems Analyses 1. 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Smith W. J. Can EV (electric vehicles) address Ireland’s CO2 emissions from transport? Energy 2010:35(12):4514–4521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.029 (in German)10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.029
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Hayes J. G., De Oliveira R. P. R., Vaughan S., Egan M. G. Simplified electric vehicle power train models and range estimation. Presented at the IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2011.604316310.1109/VPPC.2011.6043163
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Campanari S., Manzolini G., De la Iglesia F. G. Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. Journal of Power Sources 2009:186(2):464–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.11510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.115
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Van Sterkenburg S., et al. Analysis of regenerative braking efficiency—A case study of two electric vehicles operating in the Rotterdam area. Presented at the 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2011.604310910.1109/VPPC.2011.6043109
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Athanasopoulou L., Bikas H., Stavropoulos P. Comparative Well-to-Wheel Emissions Assessment of Internal Combustion Engine and Battery Electric Vehicles. Procedia CIRP 2018:78:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.16910.1016/j.procir.2018.08.169
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Singh B., Ellingsen, L. A. W., Strømman A. H. Pathways for GHG emission reduction in Norwegian road transport sector: Perspective on consumption of passenger car transport and electricity mix. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2015:41:160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.02810.1016/j.trd.2015.09.028
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership: Third Report. National Academies Press, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Sovran G. Revisiting the formulas for tractive and braking energy on the EPA driving schedules. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems 2013:6(1):269–282. https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-076610.4271/2013-01-0766
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Kirkinen J., Palosuo T., Holmgren K., Savolainen I. Greenhouse impact due to the use of combustible fuels: Life cycle viewpoint and relative radiative forcing commitment. Environmental Management 2008:42(3):458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9145-z10.1007/s00267-008-9145-z251708818521657
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Shonnard D. R., Klemetsrud B., Sacramento-Rivero J., Navarro-Pineda F., Hilbert J., Handler R., Suppen N., Donovan R. P. A review of environmental life cycle assessments of liquid transportation biofuels in the Pan American region. Environmental Management 2015:56(6):1356–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0543-810.1007/s00267-015-0543-826041501
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Doyle M. W., Von Windheim J. Environmental management strategy: four forces analysis. Environmental Management 2015:55(1):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0389-510.1007/s00267-014-0389-525331643
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 669 - 680
Published on: Oct 22, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Electric car,
internal combustion engine,
overall energy efficiency
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Aiman Albatayneh, Mohammad N. Assaf, Dariusz Alterman, Mustafa Jaradat, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article