Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Explain Energy Saving Behaviour Cover

Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Explain Energy Saving Behaviour

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By: Bhavana Arya and  Shiromi Chaturvedi  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. [1] Ajzen I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour.in K. J. Beckman, and J. Beckman, Eds., Action Control: From Cognition to Behaviour. Berlin: Springer, 1985:11–39.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1991:50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009:29(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.00410.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Alam S., et al. Factors Affecting Energy-Efficient Household Products Buying Intention: Empirical Study. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-000610.2478/rtuect-2019-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Alam S., Nor N. Ahmad M., Hashim N. A Survey on Renewable Energy Development in Malaysia: Current Status, Problems and Prospects. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2016:17(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2016-000210.1515/rtuect-2016-0002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Latosov E., Volkova A., Siirde A., Methodological Approach to Determining the Effect of Parallel Energy Consumption on District Heating System. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-000110.1515/rtuect-2017-0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Chen J., et al. A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Science of the Total Environment 2017:579:1000–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.02510.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.02527908624
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Du S., Li H., Malin S. Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016:112(P2):1600–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.08610.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.086
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Singh A., Singh B., Dhingra A. Drivers and Barriers of Green Manufacturing Practices Drivers and Barriers of Green Manufacturing Practices: A Survey of Indian Industries. IJMRS’s International Journal of Engineering Sciences 2012:1(1): 5–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Bhattacharya A., Oppenheim J., Stern N. Driving sustainable development through better infrastructure: Key elements of a transformation program. Brookings Global Working Paper Series. Washington: Brookings, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Coburn B., Inna Sekirov I., Finlay B. Type III secretion systems and disease. Clinical microbiology reviews 2007:20(4):535–549. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00013-0710.1128/CMR.00013-07217604917934073
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Durantini M., et al. Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behaviour change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychological bulletin 2006:132(2):212–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.21210.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212480328216536642
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Trope Y., Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological review 2010:117(2):440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001896310.1037/a0018963315282620438233
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill House, 1988.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Schwartz S. H. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1977:10:221–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-510.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Stern P., Dietz T., Gregory A. A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1998:58:984–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449805800600810.1177/0013164498058006008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Armitage C., Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001:40(4):471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/01446660116493910.1348/014466601164939
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Fishbein M. A Reasoned Action Approach to Health Promotion. Medical Decision Making 2008:28(6):834–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0832609210.1177/0272989X08326092
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Schultz P., Shriver C., Tabanico J., Khazian A. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of environmental psychology 2004:24(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-710.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Li D., et al. What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behaviour? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019:146:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.02410.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Aman L., Harun A., Hussein Z. The influence of environmental knowledge and concern on green purchase intention the role of attitude as a mediating variable. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 2012:7(2):145–167.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Heath Y., Gifford R. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002:32(10):2154–2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Gifford R. The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers that Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. American Psychologist 2011:66(4):290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002356610.1037/a0023566
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology 2014:49(3):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.1203410.1002/ijop.12034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Liberman N., Michael D., Sagristano M., Trope Y. The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of experimental social psychology 2002:38:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-810.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Liberman N., Förster J. Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009:97(2):203–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001567110.1037/a001567119634971
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Boninger S., Faith Gleicher F., Strathman A. Counterfactual thinking: From what might have been to what may be. Journal of personality and social psychology 1994:67(2):297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.29710.1037/0022-3514.67.2.297
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Keough K., Zimbardo P., Boyd J. Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and applied social psychology 1999:21(2):149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BA21020710.1207/S15324834BA210207
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Agerström J., Björklund F. Why people with an eye toward the future are more moral: The role of abstract thinking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2013:35(4):373–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.80396710.1080/01973533.2013.803967
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Milfont T. L., Wilson J., Diniz P. K. C. Time Perspective and Environmental Engagement: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Psychology 2012:47:325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.64702910.1080/00207594.2011.64702922452746
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Mishal A., Dubey R., Gupta O., Luo Z. Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2017:9(5):682–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-11-2016-016810.1108/IJCCSM-11-2016-0168
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Kautish P. Environmentally conscious consumer behaviour and green marketing: an analytical study of the Indian market. Green Consumerism: Perspectives, Sustainability, and Behaviour. USA: Apple Academic Press, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Dursun I., Kabadayi E., Koksal C., Tuger A. Pro-Environmental Consumption: Is It Really All About the Environment? Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics 2016:3(2):114–134.10.17261/Pressacademia.2016219940
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behaviour. The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.10.4324/9780203838020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Webb T., Sheeran P. Does changing behavioural intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological bulletin 2006:132(2):249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.24910.1037/0033-2909.132.2.24916536643
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. 1977.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Pelletier L., Sharp E. Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne 2008:49(3):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001275510.1037/a0012755
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Bamberg S. Effects of implementation intentions on the actual performance of new environmentally friendly behaviours – results of two field experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2002:22(4):399–411. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2002.027810.1006/jevp.2002.0278
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Gadiraju T. Investigating the Determinants of Recycling Behaviour in Youth by Using Theory of Planned Behaviour. MA Thesis, University of South Florida, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Jain S., Kaur G. Green marketing: An attitudinal and behavioural analysis of Indian consumers. Global Business Review 2004:5(2):187–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509040050020310.1177/097215090400500203
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Taylor S., Todd P. Understanding household garbage reduction behaviour: a test of an integrated model. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 1995:14(2):192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156950140020210.1177/074391569501400202
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Fleig L., et al. From intentions via planning and behaviour to physical exercise habits. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2013:14(5):632–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.00610.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Hall P., Fong G. Temporal self-regulation theory: Integrating biological, psychological, and ecological determinants of health behaviour performance. In Hall P. (Eds) Social Neuroscience and Public Health. Springer, New York, 2013:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_310.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Bénard M., et al. Impulsivity and consideration of future consequences as moderators of the association between emotional eating and body weight status. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity 201:15(1)84–99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0721-110.1186/s12966-018-0721-1612795730189878
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Carmi N., Arnon S. The role of future orientation in environmental behaviour: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society & Natural Resources 2014:27(12):1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.92839310.1080/08941920.2014.928393
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Evans L., et al. Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change 2013:3(2):122–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate166210.1038/nclimate1662
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Arnocky S., Milfont T., Nicol J. Time perspective and sustainable behaviour: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behaviour 2014:46(5):556–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391651247498710.1177/0013916512474987
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Strathmann A., Joireman J. (eds.) Environmental Problems as Social Dilemmas: The Temporal Dimension. In Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time. Theory, Research, and Application. Taylor & Francis Group 2005:289–304. https://doi.org/10.4324/978141061351610.4324/9781410613516
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Khachatryan H., Joireman J., Casavant K. Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2013:34:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.00110.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Corral-Verdugo V., et al. Consideration of immediate and future consequences in accepting and responding to anthropogenic climate change. Psychology 2017:8(10):1519–1531. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.81010110.4236/psych.2017.810101
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Gao Y., Mattila A., Lee S. A meta-analysis of behavioural intentions for environment-friendly initiatives in hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2016:54:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.01.01010.1016/j.ijhm.2016.01.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Paladino A., Baggiere J. Are we “green”? An empirical investigation of renewable electricity consumption. ACR European Advances in Consumer Research 2007:8:340–341.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] McCarty J., Shrum L. The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behaviour. Journal of Business Research 1994:30(1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90068-X10.1016/0148-2963(94)90068-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Kilbourne W., Pickett G. How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Business Research 2008:61:(9):885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.01610.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Liberati M., et al. Beyond protection: Expanding “conservation opportunity” to redefine conservation planning in the 21st century. Journal of environmental management 183:(2016):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.04110.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.04127570145
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. [58] Dunlap R., Liere K., Mertig A., Jones R. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues 2000:56(3):425–442.10.1111/0022-4537.00176
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. [59] Geng L., et al. Connections with nature and environmental behaviours. PloS One 2015:10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.012724710.1371/journal.pone.0127247443613425985075
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. [60] Sánchez M., Lafuente R. Defining and measuring environmental consciousness. Revista Internacional de Sociologia (RIS) 2010:68(3):731–55. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.11.0310.3989/ris.2008.11.03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. [61] Abrahamse W., Steg L. Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review 2011:18(1):30–40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. [62] Pinheiro J., Corral-Verdugo V. Time perspective and sustainable behaviour. Psychological approaches to sustainability. Current trends in theory, research and applications 2010:205–224.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. [63] Levine D., Strube M. Environmental attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviours among college students. The Journal of social psychology 2012:152(3):308–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.60436310.1080/00224545.2011.60436322558826
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. [64] Morren M., Grinstein A. Explaining environmental behaviour across borders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2016:47:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.00310.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. [65] Laner M. It’s Not Easy Being Green: Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behaviours Among College Students. Honors Program Theses.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 516 - 528
Published on: Sep 26, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Consideration of future consequences,
environmental awareness,
pro-environment behaviour,
theory of planned action
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Bhavana Arya, Shiromi Chaturvedi, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article