References
- [1] Langemeyer J., Gomez-Baggethun E., Haase D., Scheuer S., Elmqvist T. Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy 2016:62:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.01310.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
- [2] Ishizaka A., Nemery P. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.10.1002/9781118644898
- [3] Yazdani M., Payam A. F. A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS. Materials & Design 2015:65:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.00410.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.004
- [4] Debbarma B., Chakraborti P., Bose P. K., Deb M., Banerjee R. Exploration of PROMETHEE II and VIKOR methodology in a MCDM approach for ascertaining the optimal performance-emission trade-off vantage in a hydrogen-biohol dual fuel endeavour. Fuel 2017:210:922–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.01610.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.016
- [5] Chen Y., Ran Y., Wang Z., Li X., Yang X., Zhang G. An extended MULTIMOORA method based on OWGA operator and Choquet integral for risk prioritization identification of failure modes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2020:91:103605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.10360510.1016/j.engappai.2020.103605
- [6] Obayiuwana E., Falowo O. A multimoora approach to access network selection process in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE AFRICON Conf. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2015.7331973.10.1109/AFRCON.2015.7331973
- [7] Sennaroglu B., Varlik Celebi G. A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2018:59:160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.02210.1016/j.trd.2017.12.022
- [8] Garg R., Jain D. Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making evaluation of e-learning websites using FAHP, COPRAS, VIKOR, WDBA. Decision Science Letters 2017:6(4):351–364. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.003.10.5267/j.dsl.2017.2.003
- [9] Fakhrehosseini S. F. Selecting the Optimal Industrial Investment by Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods with Emphasis on TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS (Case Study of Guilan Province). International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering 2020:8(4):312–324. https://doi.org/10.22105/riej.2020.216548.1117
- [10] Batur Sir G. D., Çalışkan E. Assessment of development regions for financial support allocation with fuzzy decision making: A case of Turkey. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2019:66:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.02.00510.1016/j.seps.2019.02.005
- [11] Leal J. E. AHP-express : A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX 2020:7:100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.02110.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021699301332021813
- [12] Opricovic S. Compromise solution by MCDM methods : A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. 2004:156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-110.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
- [13] Chatterjee P., Manikrao V., Chakraborty S. Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials & Designs 2011:32(2):851–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.01010.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.010
- [14] Ajrina A. S., Sarno R., Hari Ginardi R. V. Comparison of MOORA and COPRAS Methods Based on Geographic Information System For Determining Potential Zone of Pasir Batu Mining. International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, ICOIACT 2019:360–365. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.893846510.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.8938465
- [15] Suharevska, K., Blumberga, D. Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):47–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-005410.2478/rtuect-2019-0054
- [16] Whiteman, A., Sohn, H., Esparrago, J., Arkhipova, I., and Elsayed S. Renewable Capacity Statistics. IRENA, 2018. [Online]. [Accessed: April 7, 2020]. Available: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Mar/IRENA_RE_Capacity_Statistics_2018.pdf
- [17] A. Ilas, P. Ralon, A. Rodriguez, and M. Taylor. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. International Renewable Energy Agency, IRENA, 2018. [Online]. [Accessed: April 8, 2020]. Available: https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/May/Renewable-power-generation-costs-in-2018
- [18] US Energy Information Administration. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources. Annual Energy Outlook 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: April 8, 2020]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf.
- [19] European Environment Agency. Renewable Energy in Europe – 2017 Update. EEA Report, No. 23/2017 [Online]. [Accessed: April 7, 2020]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/renewable-energy-in-europe
- [20] World Nuclear Association. Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources. WNA Report, 2011. [Online]. [Accessed: April 7, 2020]. Available: http://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/WNA/Publications/Working_Group_Reports/comparison_of_lifecycle.pdf
- [21] Ferroukhi, R., Khalid, A., García-Baños, C., and Renner, M. Renewable Energy and Jobs – Annual Review 2017. IRENA, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: April 8, 2020]. Available: https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/May/Renewable-Energy-and-Jobs--Annual-Review-2017
- [22] Saaty T. L., Ozdemir M. S. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2003:38(3–4):233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-510.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5
- [23] Kablan M. M. Decision support for energy conservation promotion: An analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy 2004:32(10):1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00078-810.1016/S0301-4215(03)00078-8
- [24] Opricovic S. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research 2007:178:514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.02010.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
- [25] Hafezalkotob A., Hafezalkotob A. Interval target-based VIKOR method supported on interval distance and preference degree for machine selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2017:57:184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.10.01810.1016/j.engappai.2016.10.018
- [26] Sayadi M. K., Heydari M., Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2009:33(5):2257–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.00210.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002
- [27] Nuuter T., Lill I., Tupenaite L. Land Use Policy Comparison of housing market sustainability in European countries based on multiple criteria assessment. Land Use Policy 2015:42:642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.02210.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.022
- [28] Hafezalkotob A., Hafezalkotob A., Kazem M. Extension of MULTIMOORA method with interval numbers: An application in materials selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2016:40(2):1372–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.07.01910.1016/j.apm.2015.07.019
- [29] Karande P., Chakraborty S. Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Materials & Design 2012:37:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.01310.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.013
- [30] Mareschal, B. Visual PROMETHEE 1.4 Manual. VPSolutions 2012-2013:1–192. [Online]. [Accessed: April 9, 2020]. Available: http://www.promethee-gaia.net/files/VPManual.pdf