GHG Performance Evaluation in Green Deal Context
References
- [1] European Commission. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 2019.
- [2] European Commission. Clean energy. The European Green Deal. 2019.
- [3] Lee H. Climate Change Biology, 1st ed. Academic Press, 2010.
- [4] Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2008:363(1492):815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.218510.1098/rstb.2007.2185261011117761468
- [5] Bajcinovci B. Environment quality: Impact from traffic, power plant and land morphology, a case study of Prishtina. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-000610.1515/rtuect-2017-0006
- [6] Danila A. M., et al. Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990 – 2016 and inventory report 2018. Copenhagen: EEA, 2018.
- [7] Luzzati T., Gucciardi G. A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: An illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU Countries. Ecological Economics 2015:113:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.01810.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.018
- [8] Antanasijević D., et al. A differential multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of sustainability performance of European countries: Beyond country ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:165:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.13110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.131
- [9] Moutinho V., Madaleno M., Robaina M. The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach. Ecological Indicators 2017:78:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.04210.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.042
- [10] García-Álvarez M. T., Moreno B., Soares I. Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synthetic index. Ecological Indicators 2016:60:96–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.00610.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.006
- [11] Siksnelyte I., Zavadskas E. K., Bausys R., Streimikiene D. Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method. Energy Policy 2018:125:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.01310.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.013
- [12] Cucchiella F., et al. A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: A sustainability index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:78:401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.07710.1016/j.rser.2017.04.077
- [13] De Alegría I. M., et al. Spain’s fulfillment of its Kyoto commitments and its fundamental greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016:59:858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.20810.1016/j.rser.2015.12.208
- [14] Cruz L., Dias J. Energy and CO2 intensity changes in the EU-27: Decomposition into explanatory effects. Sustainable Cities and Society 2016:26:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.00710.1016/j.scs.2016.03.007
- [15] Štreimikiene D., Balezentis T. Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU ‘20-20-20’ targets in the Baltic States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:58:1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.31110.1016/j.rser.2015.12.311
- [16] Su M., et al. Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012. Applied Energy 2016:184:759–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.07410.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.074
- [17] Kijewska A., Bluszcz A. Research of varying levels of greenhouse gas emissions in European countries using the k-means method. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2016:7(5):935–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.01010.1016/j.apr.2016.05.010
- [18] Kijewska A., Bluszcz A. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union member states with the use of an agglomeration algorithm. Journal of Sustainable Mining 2016:15(4):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2017.02.00110.1016/j.jsm.2017.02.001
- [19] Randma T. Estonia needs a plan and support to get rid of its dirty oil shale. Energy Post, 2018.
- [20] Volkova A., Latosov E., Siirde A. Heat Storage Combined with Biomass CHP under the National Support Policy. A Case Study of Estonia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):171–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-001110.2478/rtuect-2020-0011
- [21] O’Sullivan K. Ireland has third highest emissions of greenhouse gas in EU. The Irish Times, 2019.
- [22] Statistics Finland. Greenhouse gas emissions increased, emission allocation exceeded. Environmental and natural Resources 2019. Helsinki, 2019.
- [23] Opricovic S., Tzeng G. H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 2004:156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-110.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
- [24] Leal J. E. AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX 2020:7:100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.02110.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021699301332021813
Language: English
Page range: 431 - 441
Published on: Jun 24, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2020 Beate Zlaugotne, Linda Ievina, Reinis Azis, Denis Baranenko, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.