[6] Mazziotta M., Pareto A. Methods for Constructing Composite Indices: One for All or All for One? RIEDS – Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica 2013:67(2):67–80.
[9] European Commission. NACE Rev. 2 – Statistical classification of economic activites in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008.
[15] Pérez K., González-Araya M. C., Iriarte A. Energy and GHG emission efficiency in the Chilean manufacturing industry: Sectoral and regional analysis by DEA and Malmquist indexes. Energy Economics 2017:66:290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.02210.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.022
[16] Sutthichaimethee P., Ariyasajjakorn D. Forecast of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Consumption in Industry Sectors in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):107–117. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2018-000710.2478/rtuect-2018-0007
[20] Central Statistics Bureau of Latvia. Entrepreneurship indicators of enterprises (SBG010) [Online]. [Accessed: 10.02.2020]. Availeble: http://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/uzn/uzn__uzndarb/SBG010.px
[22] International Organization for Standardization. The ISO Survey of certifications to management system standards - Full results. Geneva: ISO, 2018.
[25] Eurostat. Energy supply and use by NACE Rev. 2 activity [Online]. [Accessed 02.03.2020]. Available: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ac_pefasu&lang=en
[26] Eurostat. Environmental benefits due to innovation in the enterprises by NACE Rev. 2 activity and size class [Online]. [Accessed 02.03.2020]. Available: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=inn_cis9_env&lang=en