Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ranking of Bioresources for Biogas Production Cover

Ranking of Bioresources for Biogas Production

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. [1] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. A policy framework for Climate and Energy in the period from 2020 to 2030, 2014. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] European Commission. 2050 long-term strategy. Going climate-neutral by 2050, 2018. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Bereiter B., Eggleston S., Schmitt J., Nehrbass-Ahles C., Stocker T. F., Fischer H., Kipfstuhl S., Chappellaz J. Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present. Geophysical Research Letters 2015:42(2):542–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL06195710.1002/2014GL061957
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee, the committee of the regions and the European investment bank. A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, 2018. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Scarlat N., Dallemand J. F., Fahl F. Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe. Renewable Energy 2018:129 (A):457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.00610.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Yu Q., Liu R., Li K., Ma R. A review of crop straw pretreatment methods for biogas production by anaerobic digestion in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:107:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.02010.1016/j.rser.2019.02.020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Timonen K., Sinkko T., Luostarinen S., Tampio E., Joensuu K. LCA of anaerobic digestion: Emission allocation for energy and digestate. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:235:1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.08510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.085
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Chen X. Y., Vinh-Thang H., Ramirez A. A., Rodrigue D., Kaliaguine S.. Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading. RSC Advances 2015:5:31:24399–24448. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA00666J10.1039/C5RA00666J
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Karklins A. Biogas production in Latvia. Possibilities of obaining and using biomethane [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. http://www.sam.gov.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_6133_6_LBA_biometans_SM_06.2016.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] BiogasAction – New developments in Latvia. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. https://www.fedarene.org/biogasaction-new-developments-latvia-23060.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Development of biogas in Latvia [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. http://latvijasbiogaze.lv/index.php?c=3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Renewable energy consumption in 2017 [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/statistika/statistikas-temas/vide-energetika/energetika/meklet-tema/2407-atjaunigoenergoresursu-paterins-2017-gada.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Meyer A. K. P., Ehimen E. A., Holm-Nielsen J. B. Future European biogas: Animal manure, straw and grass potentials for a sustainable European biogas production. Biomass and Bioenergy 2018:111:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.01310.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Mano Esteves E. M., Naranjo Herrera A. M., Peçanha Esteves V. P., Morgado C. R. V. Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 219:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.09110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.091
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Muizniece I., Zihare L., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Circular Economy and Bioeconomy Interaction Development as Future for Rural Regions. Case Study of Aizkraukle Region in Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):129–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-008410.2478/rtuect-2019-0084
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Lauka D., Slisane D., Ievina L., Muizniece I., Blumberga D. When Bioeconomy Development Becomes a Biomass Energy Competitor. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):347–359. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0100.10.2478/rtuect-2019-0100
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Conti F., Saidi A., Goldbrunner M., CFD Modelling of Biomass Mixing in Anaerobic Digesters of Biogas Plants. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):57–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-007910.2478/rtuect-2019-0079
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Blumberga, D., Veidenbergs, I., Romagnoli, F., Rochas, C., Žandeckis, A. Bioenergy Technologies, Riga: RTU, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] European Environmental Agency. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Biological treatment of waste – anaerobic digestion at biogas facilities [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: file:///C:/Users/jelen/Downloads/5.B.2%20Biological%20treatment%20of%20waste%20-%20anaerobic%20Digestion%20Biogas%202019.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Li K., Liu R., Sun C. A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:54:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.10310.1016/j.rser.2015.10.103
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ministry of Environment and Regional development of Latvia. Land policy plan for 2016–2020. [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. (in Latvian) http://www.varam.gov.lv/in_site/tools/download.php?file=files/text/Sab_lidzdaliba/sab_apsp/VARAM_Zemes_politikas_plans_211116.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Prochnow A., Heiermann M., Plöchl M., Linke B., Idler C., Amon T., Hobbs P. J. Bioenergy from permanent grassland – A review: 1. Biogas. Bioresource Technology 2009:100:21:4931–4944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.07010.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.07019546001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Chiumenti A., Borso F., Limina S. Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant: Efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation. Waste Management 2018:71:704–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.04610.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.04628389052
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Latvian Renewable Energy federation. Biogas energy [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: https://www.laef.lv/en/biogas//
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Putri D., Saputro R., Budiyono B. Biogas Production from Cow Manure. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 2012:1:2:61–64. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.1.2.61-6410.14710/ijred.1.2.61-64
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Berglund Odhner P., Sárvári Horváth I., H. Mohseni Kabir M., Schabbauer A. Biogas from lignocellulosic biomass, 2012 [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. http://www.sgc.se/ckfinder/userfiles/files/SGC247.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Tong H., Tong Y. W., Peng Y. H. A comparative life cycle assessment on mono- and co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge. Energy Procedia 2019:158:4166–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.81410.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.814
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Climate Change Connection. CO2 equivalents [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: https://climatechangeconnection.org/emissions/co2-equivalents/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Brēmere I., Indriksone D., Klāvs G., Reķis J. Synergies and Conflicting Impacts of GHG Reduction Measures Recommendation Report. 2016 [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: https://www.bef.lv/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Rekomendacijas_zinojums_BEF.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Advertisements [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: www.ss.comhttps://www.ss.com/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Tariffs for municipal waste [Online]. [Accessed 15.05.2015]. Available: http://www.getlini.lv/en/private-clients
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 368 - 377
Published on: Jun 15, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Biogas,
economic feasibility,
maize,
manure,
substrate efficiency,
TOPSIS
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Ketija Bumbiere, Agita Gancone, Jelena Pubule, Vladimirs Kirsanovs, Saulius Vasarevicius, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article