Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Energy Efficiency – Indoor Air Quality Dilemma in Educational Buildings: A Possible Solution Cover

Energy Efficiency – Indoor Air Quality Dilemma in Educational Buildings: A Possible Solution

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By: Liva AsereORCID and  Andra BlumbergaORCID  
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. [1] Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union 2018:L 156/75.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Structural Survey 2005:23(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ss.2005.11023aab.00110.1108/ss.2005.11023aab.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] European Commission. A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Brussels: European Commission, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] European Commission. 2030 Climate & Energy framework - Climate Action. 2030 Climate & Energy Framework, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] European Environment Agency. Share of EU energy consumption from renewable sources, 2005–2050. 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] European Commission Report. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The application of Council Regulation 2157/2001 of 8 October 2001 on the Statute for a European Company (SE). Brussels: European Commission, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Du X., Bokel R., van den Dobbelsteen A. Spatial configuration, building microclimate and thermal comfort: A modern house case. Energy and Buildings 2019:193:185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.03810.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.038
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Gładyszewska-Fiedoruk K., Krawczyk D. A. The possibilities of energy consumption reduction and a maintenance of indoor air quality in doctor’s offices located in north-eastern Poland. Energy and Buildings 2014:85:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.04110.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.041
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Asere L., Mols T., Blumberga A. Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in Renovated Buildings of Liepāja Municipality. Energy Procedia 2016:91:907–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.25710.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.257
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Csobod É., et al. SINPHONIE – Schools Indoor Pollution and Health Observatory Network in Europe - Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Gladyszewska-Fiedoruk K. Survey Research of Selected Issues the Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in an Office Building. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-005010.2478/rtuect-2019-0050
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Becker R., Goldberger I., Paciuk M. Improving energy performance of school buildings while ensuring indoor air quality ventilation. Building and Environment 2007:42(9):3261–3276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Vasile V., et al. Indoor Air Quality - A Key Element of the Energy Performance of the Buildings. Energy Procedia 2016:96:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.15010.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.150
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Földváry V., et al. Effect of energy renovation on indoor air quality in multifamily residential buildings in Slovakia. Building and Environment 2017:122:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.00910.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Ghita S. A., Catalina T. Energy efficiency versus indoor environmental quality in different Romanian countryside schools. Energy and Buildings 2015:92:140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.04910.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Dascalaki E. G., Sermpetzoglou V. G. Energy performance and indoor environmental quality in Hellenic schools. Energy and Buildings 2011:43(2–3):718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.01710.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Yang W., et al. Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings in Korea. Journal of Environmental Management 2009:90(1):348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.00310.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.00318079045
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Baker L., Bernstein H. The Impact of School Buildings on Student Health and Performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Research Foundation, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] d´Ambrosio Alfano F. R., et al. Indoor Environment And Energy Efficiency In Schools - Part 1. Brussels, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Asere L., Blumberga A. Does energy efficiency-indoor air quality dilemma have an impact on the gross domestic product? Journal of Environmental Management 2019:262:110270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11027010.1016/j.jenvman.2020.11027032094106
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Wargocki P., Wyon D. P. Providing better thermal and air quality conditions in school classrooms would be cost-effective. Building and Environment 2013:59:581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.00710.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Bakó-Biró Z., et al. Ventilation rates in schools and pupils’ performance. Building and Environment 2012:48(1):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.01810.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] SolarGIS. Solar resource maps and GIS data. 2020. [Online]. [Accessed 07.02.2020]. Available: https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/download/latvia
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Arnulf J.-W. PV Status Report 2019. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Masson G., Kaizuka I. IEA PVPS report - Trends in Photovoltaic Applications 2019. Paris: IEA, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Eurostat. Electricity production capacities for renewables and wastes [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nrg_inf_epcrw&lang=en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] AS Augstsprieguma tīkls. Elektroenergijas tirgus apskats, AST. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: http://www.ast.lv/lv/electricity-market-review
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Eurostat. Area of wooded land (source: FAO - FE) [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Gathier G., Jossart J.-M., Calderon C. AEBIOM Statistical Report. Pellet Market Overview. European Bioenergy Outlook. Brussels: European Biomass Associaton, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Eurostat. Eurostat celebrates Latvia - Product [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20171118-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Rickerson W., et al. IEA-RETD Residential Prosumers-Drivers and Policy Options (Re-Prosumers). Paris: IEA, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Flaute M., et al. Macroeconomic effects of prosumer households in Germany. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 2017:7(1):146–155.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Toffler A. Future Shock: The Third Wave. Bantam Book, 1981.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Oberst C. A., Schmitz H., Madlener R. Are Prosumer Households That Much Different? Evidence From Stated Residential Energy Consumption in Germany. Ecological Economics 2019:158:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.01410.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Keiner D., et al. Cost optimal self-consumption of PV prosumers with stationary batteries, heat pumps, thermal energy storage and electric vehicles across the world up to 2050. Solar Energy 2109:185:406–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.08110.1016/j.solener.2019.04.081
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Breyer C., Gerlach A. Global overview on grid-parity. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2013:21(1):121–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.125410.1002/pip.1254
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Photovoltaic Software. How to calculate output energy of PV solar systems? 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://photovoltaic-software.com/principle-ressources/how-calculate-solar-energy-power-pv-systems
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Wujek P., Sprawka P. New PV Micro-Modules on Standard Roof Tiles. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(2):338–346. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-007210.2478/rtuect-2019-0072
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] 2020 Electricity Tariff Calculator Electroenergy Tariff Comparison [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.elektroenergija.lv/en
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] AS Sadales tīkls. AS Sadales tīkls, elektroenerģijas sadales sistēmas pakalpojumu diferencētie tarifi no 2020.gada 1. janvāra (bez PVN) (JSC Sadales tīkls, differentiated tariffs for electricity distribution system services from January 1, 2020 (excluding VAT)) [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.sadalestikls.lv/uploads/2020/01/ST_tarifi_2020-labots.pdf (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Elektrum. Mandatory procurement and capacity components : Electricity [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.elektrum.lv/en/for-business/electricity/mandatory-procurement-and-capacity-components-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] AS Sadales tīkls. Microgenerator connection [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.sadalestikls.lv/en/to-customers/connections/microgenerator-connection
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] AS Sadales tīkls. Power plant connection [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.sadalestikls.lv/en/to-customers/connections/producer-connections
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] SPRK. Tarifi (Tariffs) [Online]. [Accessed 27.05.2020]. Available: https://www.sprk.gov.lv/content/tarifi-4 (in Latvian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] EEA. CO2 emission intensity – European Environment Agency. 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 357 - 367
Published on: Jun 15, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
educational buildings,
energy efficiency,
indoor air quality,
prosumers,
renewable energy sources,
GHG emissions
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Liva Asere, Andra Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article