Life Cycle Assessment of Foam Concrete Production in Latvia
References
- [1] UNEP SBCI. Buildings and Climate Change. Summary for Decision-Makers. Paris: DTIE, 2009.
- [2] Wolf C., Pomponi F., Moncaster A. Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy Build 2017:140:68–80. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.07510.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075
- [3] European Union. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European parliament and council on the energy performance of buildings. Official Journal of the European Union 2010:L153/13.
- [4] Genovaite L., Mindaugas B. The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policy. Renewable Energy 2017:106:298–309. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.03610.1016/j.renene.2017.01.036
- [5] Brojan L., Petric A., Clouston P. L. A comparative study of brick and straw bale wall systems from environmental, economical and energy perspectives. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2013:8(11):920–926.
- [6] Sinka M., et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of magnesium binders as an alternative for hemp concrete. Resources conservation and recycling 2018:133:288–299. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.02410.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.024
- [7] Suhendro B. Toward Green Concrete for Better Sustainable Environment. Procedia Engineering 2014:95:305–320. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.19010.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.190
- [8] Siram K. K. B., Raj K. A. Concrete + Green = Foam Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 2013:4(4):179–184.
- [9] Ramamurthy K., Nambiar E. K., Ranjani G. I. S. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites 2009:31(6):388–396. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006
- [10] Khan Q. S., et al. Experimental investigation on foam concrete without and with recycled glass powder: A sustainable solution for future construction. Construction and Building Materials 2019:201:369–379. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.178
- [11] Gökçe H. S., Hatungimana D., Ramyar K. Effect of fly ash and silica fume on hardened properties of foam concrete. Construction and Building Materials 2019:194:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.036
- [12] Falliano D., et al. Experimental investigation on the compressive strength of foamed concrete: Effect of curing conditions, cement type, foaming agent and dry density. Construction and Building Materials 2018:165:735–749. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.24110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.241
- [13] Hertz K. CO2 emissions from super-light structures. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 2010.
- [14] Heijungs R. Ecodesign — Carbon Footprint — Life Cycle Assessment — Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. A Flexible Framework for a Continuum of Tools. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2010:4(1):42–46. doi:10.2478/v10145-010-0016-510.2478/v10145-010-0016-5
- [15] ISO 14040:2006. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework, 2006.
- [16] ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, 2006.
- [17] Goedkoop M., et al. Introduction to LAC with SimaPro. Pre, 2016.
- [18] Guinée J. B., et al. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2002:7:311. doi:10.1007/BF0297889710.1007/BF02978897
- [19] Acero A. P., Rodríguez C., Ciroth A. LCIA methods Impact assessment methods in Life Cycle Assessment and their impact categories. Berlin: Greendeta, 2017
- [20] Namsone E., Šahmenko G., Korjakins A. Durability Properties of High Performance Foamed Concrete. Procedia Engineering 2017:172:760–767. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.12010.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.120
- [21] Namsone E., Korjakins A., Šahmenko G., Šinka M. The Environmental Impacts of Foamed Concrete Production and Exploitation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017:251:20–29. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/251/1/01202910.1088/1757-899X/251/1/012029
- [22] Heath A. C., Paine K. A., McManus M. C. Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014:78:75–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.04610.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.046
- [23] Mahmud M. A. P., Huda N., Farjana S. H., Lang C. Comparative Life Cycle Environmental Impact Analysis of Lithium-Ion (LiIo) and Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) Batteries. Batteries 2019:5(1):22. doi:10.3390/batteries501002210.3390/batteries5010022
- [24] Bricks, pavement, building blocks company Lode [Online]. [Accessed 11.01.2019]. Available: https://lode.lv/produkts/keraterm-44-s/
- [25] Nagy B., Tóth E. Hydrothermal behaviour of hollow and filled ceramic masonry block. Presented at the International RILEM Conference on Materials, Systems and Structures in Civil Engineering Conference segment on Moisture in Materials and Structures, 2016 Lyngby, Denmark, 2016:279–289.
- [26] Gong X. Z., Tian Y. L., Zhang L. J. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Typical Foam Glass Production. Materials Science Forum 2018:913:1054–1061. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.913.105410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.913.1054
- [27] Invent company Stikloporas [Online]. [Accessed 15.01.2019]. Available: http://www.stikloporas.lt/
- [28] Company Bauroc [Online]. [Accessed 11.01.2019]. Available: https://bauroc.lv/product/universal/
Language: English
Page range: 70 - 84
Published on: Dec 13, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2019 Zinta Zimele, Maris Sinka, Aleksandrs Korjakins, Diana Bajare, Genadijs Sahmenko, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.