Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Evaluation of Probability of Harmful Impact Caused by Toxic Spill Emergencies Cover

Numerical Evaluation of Probability of Harmful Impact Caused by Toxic Spill Emergencies

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 23 (2019): Issue 3 (December 2019)
By: Yurii Skob,  Mykhaylo Ugryumov and  Eduard Granovskiy  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. [1] Andersson B., Andersson R., Hakansson L. Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers. New York: Cambridge University Press Publ., 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139093590
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Zhang H.-D., Zheng X-P. Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in China: A statistical investigation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2012:25(4):686–693. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2012.03.00110.1016/j.jlp.2012.03.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Hughes Ph., Ferrett E. Introduction to Health and Safety at Work: The Handbook for the NEBOSH National General Certificate. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.10.4324/9780080959375
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Nolan, D. Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles: for Oil, Gas, Chemical and Related Facilities 4th ed. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Hallenbeck W. H., Flowers R. E. Risk analysis for worker exposure to benzene. Environmental Management 1992:16(3):415–420. doi:10.1007/BF0240008110.1007/BF02400081
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Chrostowski P. C., Pearsall L. J., Shaw C. Risk assessment as a management tool for inactive hazardous materials disposal sites. Environmental Management 1985:9(5):433–441. doi:10.1007/BF0186634210.1007/BF01866342
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Levin S. A., et al. New perspectives in ecotoxicology. Environmental Management 1984:8(5):375–442. doi:10.1007/BF0187180710.1007/BF01871807
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Assael M. J., Kakosimos K. E. Fires, Explosions, and Toxic Gas Dispersions: Effects Calculation and Risk Analysis. New York: CRC Press Publ., 2010. doi:10.1201/978143982676810.1201/9781439826768
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Huyen D. T. T., Tram L. T. B. Development of a Procedure for Evaluating the Impacts of the Accidental Emission of Hazardous Chemicals, Case Study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Environmental Management 2019:63(4):486–494. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0979-010.1007/s00267-017-0979-029302714
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Blumberga A., Timma L., Blumberga D. System Dynamic Model for the Accumulation of Renewable Electricity using Power-to-Gas and Power-to-Liquid Concepts. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2015:16(1):54–68. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2015-001210.1515/rtuect-2015-0012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Vigants E., et al. Modelling of Technological Solutions to 4th Generation DH Systems. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20(1):5–23. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-000710.1515/rtuect-2017-0007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Bariss U., et al. System Dynamics Modeling of Households’ Electricity Consumption and Cost-Income Ratio: a Case Study of Latvia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20(1):36–50. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-000910.1515/rtuect-2017-0009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Truong S. C. H., et al. Accidental benzene release risk assessment in an urban area using an atmospheric dispersion model. Atmospheric Environment 2016:144:146–159. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.07510.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.075
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Granovskiy E. A., et al. Numerical Modeling of Hydrogen Release, Mixture and Dispersion in Atmosphere. Proceedings of 1-st International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, Pisa, Italy, 2005. [Online]. [Accessed 24.02.2019]. Available: http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2005/Papers/110021.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Skob Y. A., Ugryumov M. L., Granovskiy E. A. Mathematical modeling of hydrogen explosion consequences at fueling station. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, Hamburg, Germany, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed 12.03.2019]. Available: https://hysafe.info/wp-content/uploads/2017_papers/159.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Kim C. H., et al. Operational Atmospheric Modeling System CARIS for Effective Emergency Response Associated with Hazardous Chemical Releases in Korea. Environmental Management 2004:33(3):345–354. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0030-510.1007/s00267-003-0030-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Markiewicz T. A review of mathematical models for the atmospheric dispersion of heavy gases. Part I. A classification of models. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S 2012:19(3):297–314. doi:10.2478/v10216-011-0022-y10.2478/v10216-011-0022-y
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Rogulski M. Indoor PM10 concentration measurements using low-cost monitors in selected locations in Warsaw. Energy Procedia 2018:147:137–144. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.04310.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Barisa A., Rosa M. Scenario analysis of CO2 emission reduction potential in road transport sector in Latvia. Energy Procedia 2018:147:86–95. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.03610.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.036
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Puttock J. S., et al. Dispersion models and hydrogen fluoride predictions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1991:4(1):16–28. doi:10.1016/0950-4230(91)80003-D10.1016/0950-4230(91)80003-
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Folch A., Costa A., Hankin R. K. S. Twodee-2: A shallow layer model for dense gas dispersion on complex topography. Computers & Geosciences 2009:35(3):667–674. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.01710.1016/j.cageo.2007.12.017
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Kopka P., Wawrzynczak A. Framework for stochastic identification of atmospheric contamination source in an urban area. Atmospheric Environment 2018:195:63–77. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.03510.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.035
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Burns D. S., et al. A simplified chemistry module for atmospheric transport and dispersion models: Proof-of-concept using SCIPUFF. Atmospheric Environment 2012:56:212–221. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.06710.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.067
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Merah A., Noureddine A. Reactive pollutants dispersion modeling in a street Canyon. International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2019:24(1):91–103. doi:10.2478/ijame-2019-000610.2478/ijame-2019-0006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Arvidson S., Davidson L., Peng S.-H. Interface methods for grey-area mitigation in turbulence-resolving hybrid RANS-LES. International Journal Heat and Fluid Flow 2018:73:236–257. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.08.00510.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.08.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Lipatnikov A. N., Sabelnikov V. A., Poludnenko A. Y. Assessment of a transport equation for mean reaction rate using DNS data obtained from highly unsteady premixed turbulent flames. International Journal Heat and Mass Transfer 2019:134:398–404. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.04310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.043
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Galeev A. D., Starovoitova E. V., Ponikarov S. I. Numerical simulation of the formation of a toxic cloud on outpouring ejection of liquefied chlorine to the atmosphere. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics 2013:86(1):219–228. doi:10.1007/s10891-013-0823-110.1007/s10891-013-0823-1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Engeln-Müllges G., Niederdrenk K., Wodicka R. Numerik-Algorithmen: Verfahren, Beispiele, Anwendungen. Berlin: Xpert.press Publ., 2010. (in German) doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13473-910.1007/978-3-642-13473-9
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Snegirev A. Y., Frolov A. S. The large eddy simulation of a turbulent diffusion flame. High Temperature 2011:49:690–704. doi:10.1134/S0018151X1104020110.1134/S0018151X11040201
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Sutthichaimethee P., Ariyasajjakorn D. Forecast of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Consumption in Industry Sectors in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):107–117. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2018-000710.2478/rtuect-2018-0007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Belyaev N. N., Koptilaya O. V. Kompiuternoe modelirovanie zagriazneniia okruzhaiushchei sredy pri razlive ammiaka. Dnipropetrovsk. Ekologia prirodokoristuvannia – Ecology and nature management, Transactions of IPPE NAN Ukraine. 2002:2:158–162. (in Russian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Slisane D., Blumberga D. Assessment of Roadside Particulate Emission Mitigation Possibilities. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2013:12(1):4–9. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2013-000910.2478/rtuect-2013-0009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Matsak V. G., Khotsianov L. K. Gigienicheskoe znachenie skorosti ispareniia i davleniia para toksicheskikh veshchestv primeniaemykh v proizvodstve. Moscow: Medgiz, 1959. (in Russian)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] RD-03-26-2007. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya po otsenke posledstviy avariynykh vybrosov opasnykh veshchestv. (Methodological guidelines for the assessment of the consequences of accidental releases of hazardous substances.) Moscow: STC “Industrial safety”, 2008:27(6):122.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Knott G. D. Interpolating Cubic Splines. Boston: Birkhäuser Publ., 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Skob Y. A., Ugryumov M. L. Kompyuterna interaktyvna systema inzhenernoho analizu ta prohnozu “Toxic Spill Safety” dlya otsinky bezpeky pid chas avariynoho prolyttya toksychnoho zridzhenoho hazu. (Computer Interactive System “Toxic Spill Safety” of Engineering Analysis and Forecast for Safety Assessment of Accidental Spillage of Toxic Liquefied Gas). Official bulletin of copyrights 2017:45:212.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0075 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Dec 13, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Gas mixtures,
numerical methods for solving partial differential equations,
exposure to harmful substances,
pollution
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2019 Yurii Skob, Mykhaylo Ugryumov, Eduard Granovskiy, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 23 (2019): Issue 3 (December 2019)Next article