Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Why Biopolymer Packaging Materials are Better

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 23 (2019): Issue 2 (November 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. [1] Ramos M., Valdes A., Beltran A., Garrigós M. Gelatin-based films and coatings for food packaging applications. Coatings 2016:6(4):41. doi:10.3390/coatings604004110.3390/coatings6040041
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Marsh K., Bugusu B. Food Packaging – Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues. Journal of Food Science 2007:72(3):39–55. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Zihare L., Blumberga D. Market Opportunities for Cellulose Products From Combined Renewable Resources. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19(1):33–38. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-000310.1515/rtuect-2017-0003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Ivankovic A., Zeljko K., Talic S., Martinovic Bevanda A., Lasic M. Biodegradable Packaging in the Food Industry. Journal of Food Safety and Food Quality 2017:68(2):23–52.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Gómez-Estaca J., Gavara R., Catalá R., Hernández-muñoz P. The Potential of Proteins for Producing Food Packaging Materials : A Review. Packaging Technology and Science 2016:29(4–5):203–224. doi:10.1002/pts.219810.1002/pts.2198
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Blunden S., Wallace T. Tin in canned food : a review and understanding of occurrence and effect. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2003:41(12):1651–1662. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00217-510.1016/S0278-6915(03)00217-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Zhou J., Liu S., Qi J., Zhang L. Structure and Properties of Composite Films Prepared from Cellulose and Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide Particles. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2005:101(6):3600–3608. doi:10.1002/app.2265010.1002/app.22650
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] ASTM C 1048. Standard Specification for Heat-Treated Flat Glass-Kind HS, Kind FT Coated and Uncoated Glass, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials. ASTM Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2000:907–914.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] RaheemD. Application of plastics and paper as food packaging materials – An overview. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2012:25(3):177–188. doi:10.9755/ejfa.v25i3.1150910.9755/ejfa.v25i3.11509
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Cho B., Ryu J., Song B. Pilot Study on the Manufacture of Kraft Paper from OCC Pilot Study on the Manufacture of Kraft Paper from OCC. Journal of Korea Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry 2008:40(5).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Tutus A., Karatas B., Cicekler M. Pulp and Paper Production from Hemp by Modified Kraft Method. Presented at the 1st International Mediterranian Science and Engineering Congress, Adana, Turkey, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Costa J. L., Legrand V., Freour S. Durability of Composite Materials under Severe Temperature Conditions : Influence of Moisture Content and Prediction of Thermo-Mechanical Properties During a Fire. Journal of Composites Science 2019:3:55. doi:10.3390/jcs302005510.3390/jcs3020055
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Raut I., et al. Comparative Study on the Behavior of Virgin and Recycled Polyolefins – Cellulose Composites in Natural Environmental Conditions. Journal of Composites Science 2019:3(2):60. doi:10.3390/jcs302006010.3390/jcs3020060
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Halden R. U. Plastics and Health Risks. Annual Review of Public Health 2010:31:179–194. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.10371410.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.10371420070188
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Poustka J., et al. Acrylonitrile in Food Contact Materials – Two Different Legislative Approaches : Comparison of Direct Determination with Indirect Evaluation Using Migration into Food Simulants. Chezh Journal of Food Sciences 2007:25(5):265–271. doi:10.17221/678-CJFS10.17221/678-CJFS
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Tokiwa Y., et al. Biodegradability of Plastics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2009:10(9):3722–3742. doi:10.3390/ijms1009372210.3390/ijms10093722
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Almaadeed M. A., et al. Mechanical, sorption and adhesive properties of composites based on low-density polyethylene filled with date palm wood powder. Materials & Design 2014:53:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.09310.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.093
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Gicevska J., Bazbauers G., Repele M. Ecodesign of Liquid Fuel Tanks. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2011:6(1):17–22. doi:10.2478/v10145-011-0002-610.2478/v10145-011-0002-6
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Sarker M., et al. Chemical Products Produced from High-Density Polyethylene ( HDPE ) Waste Plastic. International Journal of Material Science 2012:2(3):56–62.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Chen G., Patel M. K. Plastics Derived from Biological Sources : Present and Future: A Technical and Environmental Review. Chemical Reviews 2011:112(4):2082–2099. doi:10.1021/cr200162d10.1021/cr200162d
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Hadad D., Geresh S., Sivan A. Biodegradation of polyethylene by the thermophilic bacterium Brevibacillus borstelensis. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2005:98(5):1093–1100. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02553.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02553.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Fabbri C., Bietti M., Lanzalunga O., Chimica D. Generation and Reactivity of Ketyl Radicals with Lignin Related Structures. On the Importance of the Ketyl Pathway in the Photoyellowing of Lignin Containing Pulps and Papers. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2005:70(7):2720–2728. doi:10.1021/jo047826u10.1021/jo047826u
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Cazón P., et al. Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocolloids 2017:68:136–148. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.00910.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Chua H., Yu P. H. F., Ma C. K. Accumulation of Biopolymers in Activated Sludge Biomass. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology1 1999:78(1–3):389–399. doi:10.1385/ABAB:78:1-3:38910.1385/ABAB:78:1-3:389
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Salgado P. R., Ortiz S. E. M., Petruccelli S., Mauri A. N. Biodegradable sunflower protein films naturally activated with antioxidant compounds. Food Hydrocolloids 2010:24(5):525–533. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.12.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.12.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Roy N., Saha N., Saha P. Biodegradable Hydrogel Film for Food Packaging Centre of Polymer Systems. Presented at the 4th WSEAS International Conference on Energy and Development, Corfu Island, Greece, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Quilter H. C., Hutchby M., Davidson M. G., Jones M. D. Polymerisation of a terpene-derived lactone: A bio-based alternative to ϵ-caprolactone. Polymer Chemistry 2017:5:833–837. doi:10.1039/C6PY02033J10.1039/C6PY02033J
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Weber C. J. Biobased Packaging Materials for the Food Industry: Status and Perspectives. Food Science & Technology 2000:5:16–20.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Tutak D., Keskin B., Abubakr S., Fleming P. D. Water Vapor Permeability (Wvtr) Of Packaging Cartons In Water Vapor Permeability (Wvtr) Of Packaging Cartons in Extreme Hot. Presented at the 6th International Printing Technologies Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Ponnambalam V., Poon S. J., Shiflet G. J. Fe-based bulk metallic glasses with diameter thickness larger than one centimeter. Journal of Materials Research 2004:19(5):1320–1323. doi:10.1557/JMR.2004.017610.1557/JMR.2004.0176
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Elsabee M. Z., Abdou E. S. Chitosan-based edible films, and coatings : A review. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2013:33(4):1819–1841. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.010.10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.01023498203
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Benavides S., Villalobos-Carvajal R., Reyes J. E. Physical, mechanical and antibacterial properties of alginate film: Effect of the crosslinking degree and oregano essential oil concentration. Journal of Food Engineering 2012:110(2):232–39. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.05.02310.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.05.023
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Pang J., et al. Fabrication of Cellulose Film with Enhanced Mechanical Properties in Ionic Liquid 1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium Chloride (AmimCl). Materials 2013:26(6):1270–1284. doi:10.3390/ma604127010.3390/6041270
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Stirna U., Fridrihsone A., Misane M., Vilsone D. Rapeseed Oil as Renewable Resource for Polyol Synthesis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2011:6(1):85–90. doi:10.2478/v10145-011-0012-410.2478/v10145-011-0012-4
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Priedniece V., Spalvins K., Ivanovs K., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Bioproducts from potatoes. A review. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:21(1):18–27. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-001310.1515/rtuect-2017-0013
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Nafchi A. M., Moradpour M., Saeidi M., Alias A. K. Thermoplastic starches: Properties, challenges, and prospects. Starch 2013:65(1–2):61–72. doi:10.1002/star.20120020110.1002/star.201200201
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Qi H., Chang C., Zhang L. Properties and applications of biodegradable transparent and photoluminescent cellulose films prepared via a green process. Green Chemistry 2009:11(2):177–184. doi:10.1039/B814721C10.1039/B814721
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Erhardt D., Tumosa C. S. Chemical Degradation of Cellulose in Paper over 500 Years. Restaurator 2005:26(3):151–158. doi:10.1515/rest.2005.26.3.15110.1515/rest.2005.26.3.151
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Shatalov I., Shatalova A., Shleikin A. Developing Of Edible Packaging Material Based On Protein Film. Football 2014:298–301.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Popa S., Sorina B., Simulescu V. Collagen films obtained from collagen solutions characterized by rheology. Materiale Plastice 2017:54(2):359–361.10.37358/MP.17.2.4851
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Abugoch L. E., et al. Food Hydrocolloids Characterization of quinoa protein chitosan blend edible films. Food Hydrocolloids 2011:25(5):879–886. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.08.00810.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.08.008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Rawdkuen S., Suthiluk P., Kamhangwong D., Benjakul S. Properties of gelatin-based film incorporated with catechin-lysozyme. Chemistry Central Journal 2012:6:131. doi:10.1186/1752-153X-6-13110.1186/1752-153X-6-131358579523134808
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Aider M. Chitosan application for active bio-based films production and potential in the food industry : Review. LWT – Food Science Technology 2010:43(6):837–842. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.01.02110.1016/j.lwt.2010.01.021
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Muizniece I., Blumberga D. Thermal Conductivity of Heat Insulation Material Made from Coniferous Needles with Potato Starch Binder. Energy Procedia 2016:95:324–329. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.01410.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.014
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Krohling R. A., Pacheco A. G. C. A-TOPSIS – An approach based on TOPSIS for ranking evolutionary algorithms. Procedia Computer Science 2015:55:308–317. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.05410.1016/j.procs.2015.07.054
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Li P., Qian H., Wu J., Chen J. Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2012:185(3):2456–1461. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2723-910.1007/s10661-012-2723-922752962
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Swain P. T. R., Biswas S. Selection of Materials Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method by Considering Physical and Mechanical Properties of Jute/Al2O3 Composites. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014:592–594:729–733. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.72910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.729
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] RISE. Roadmaps toward the future bioeconomy – the vital role of the forest industry. Stockholm: Research Institutes of Sweden, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Rawlings J. O., et al. Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool. New York: Springer, 1998.10.1007/b98890
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Zavadskas E. K., et al. Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: An overview ofdevelopments from 2000 to 2015. International Journal of Information technology and Decision Making 2016. doi:10.1142/S021962201650017610.1142/S0219622016500176
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Vinodh S., Prasanna M., Prakash N. H. Integrated Fuzzy AHP – TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method : A case study. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2014:38(19–20):4662–4672. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.00710.1016/j.apm.2014.03.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] Kaya T., Kahraman C. Expert Systems with Applications An integrated fuzzy AHP – ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 2011:38(7):8553–8562. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.05710.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.057
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Miranda G., Berna A., Mulet A. Dried-Fruit Storage: An Analysis of Package Headspace Atmosphere Changes. Foods 2019:8(2):56. doi:10.3390/foods802005610.3390/foods8020056640684330720722
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0074 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 366 - 384
Published on: Nov 18, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Biopolymers,
multi-criteria decision making,
packaging materials,
sensitivity analysis,
TOPSIS
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2019 Nadeeshika Silva, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2019): Issue 2 (November 2019)