Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 23 (2019): Issue 2 (November 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. [1] Klavins M., Bisters V., Burlakovs J. Small scale gasification application and perspectives in circular economy. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22:42–54. doi:10.2478/rtuect-2018-000310.2478/rtuect-2018-0003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Kittipongvises S. Assessment of environmental impacts of limestone quarrying operations in Thailand. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:20:67–83. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2017-001110.1515/rtuect-2017-0011
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Zappa W., Junginger M., Broe M. Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050? Applied energy 2019:233–234:1027–1050. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.10910.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.109
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Kumar A., et al. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:69:596–609. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.19110.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union 2009:L140/16.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Eurostat. Renewable energy statistics. Statistics Explained [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] European Commission. Report from the commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Rogge N. EU countries’ progress towards ‘Europe 2020 strategy targets’. Journal of Policy Modeling 2019:41(2):255–272. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.00310.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. Catalogue of Statistical Publications 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Electricity Market Review by JSC Augstsprieguma tikls [Online]. Available: http://ast.lv/lv/electricity-market-review
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] IRENA. Renewable capacity statistics 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Krog L., Sperling K. A. comprehensive framework for strategic energy planning based on Danish and international insights. Energy Strategy Reviews 2019:24:83–93. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.00510.1016/j.esr.2019.02.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Zinck Thellufsen J., Lund H. Cross-border versus cross-sector interconnectivity in renewable energy system. Energy 2017:124:492–501. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.11210.1016/j.energy.2017.02.112
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Yang Y., et al. Using multi-criteria analysis to prioritize renewable energy home heating technologies. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2018:29:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2018.06.00510.1016/j.seta.2018.06.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Dansk Arkitektur Center. Green growth in Denmark towards 2050. Four future scenarios. DK 2050.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Bergek A., Mignon I. Motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies: Evidence from Sweden. Energy Policy 2017:106:547–559. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.01610.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Mahapatra K., Gustavsson L. An adopter-centric approach to analyze the diffusion patterns of innovative residential heating systems in Sweden. Energy Policy 2008:36(2):577–590. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.00610.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Panula-Ontto J., et al. Cross-impact analysis of Finnish electricity system with increased renewables: Long-run energy policy challenges in balancing supply and consumption. Energy Policy 2018:118:504–513. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.00910.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Jung N., et al. Social acceptance of renewable energy technologies for buildings in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area of Finland. Renewable Energy 2016:99:813–824. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.00610.1016/j.renene.2016.07.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Aslani A., Helo O., Naaranoja M. Role of renewable energy policies in energy dependency in Finland: System dynamics approach. Applied Energy 2014:113:758–765. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.01510.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.015
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Gaigalis V., Markevicius A., Katinas V., Skema R. Analysis of the renewable energy promotion in Lithuania in compliance with the European Union strategy and policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014:35:422–435. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.01310.1016/j.rser.2014.04.013
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Zhang C., et al. Probabilistic multi-criteria assessment of renewable micro-generation technologies in households. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:212:582–592. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.05110.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.051
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Valodka I., Valodkienė G. The Impact of Renewable Energy on the Economy of Lithuania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015:213:123–128. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.41410.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.414
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Ligus M., Peternek P. Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Energy Procedia 2018:153:101–106. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.04610.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Paska J., Surma T. Electricity generation from renewable energy sources in Poland. Renewable Energy 2014:71:286–294. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.01110.1016/j.renene.2014.05.011
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Polityka energetyczna Polski do roku 2030 (Energy policy of Poland until 2030). Appendix to Resolution no. 202/2009 of the Council of Ministers of 10 November 2009. (in Polish)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Krajowy plan działania w zakresie energii ze zrode ł odnawialnych (National Action Plan for Renewable Energy Sources). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki, 2010. (in Polish)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Sowizdza A. Geothermal energy resources in Poland – Overview of the current state of knowledge. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:82(3):4020–4027. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.07010.1016/j.rser.2017.10.070
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Kępińska B. Geothermal energy use – country update for Poland, 2013–2015. Proceeding European geothermal congress 2016, Strasbourg, France, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Ligus M. Evaluation of economic, social and environmental effects of low-emission energy technologies development in Poland: a multi-criteria analysis with application of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Energies 2017:10(10):1550. doi:10.3390/en1010155010.3390/en10101550
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Bórawski P., et al. Development of renewable energy sources market and biofuels in the European union. Accepted manuscript. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:228:467–484. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.24210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.242
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Karatasou S, Laskari M, Santamouris M. Models of behavior change and residential energy use: a review of research directions and findings for behavior-based energy efficiency. Advances in Building Energy Research 2014:8(2):137–147. doi:10.1080/17512549.2013.80927510.1080/17512549.2013.809275
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Sengül U., et al. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renewable energy 2015:75:617–625. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.04510.1016/j.renene.2014.10.045
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Hwang C. L., Yoon K. P. Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer, 1981.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Wang J., Jing Y., Zhang C., Zhao J. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009:13(9):2263–2278. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.02110.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] IRENA, Renewable Power generation Costs in 2017. AbuDhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Lauka D. Sustainability analysis of renewable energy sources. Riga: RTU Press, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Sianaki O. A. Intelligent Decision Support System for Energy Management in Demand Response Programs and Residential and Industrial Sectors of the Smart Grid. School of Information Systems. Curtin: Curtin Business School, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Mezősi A., Szabó L., Szabó S. Cost-efficiency benchmarking of European renewable electricity support schemes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy reviews 2018:98:217–226. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.00110.1016/j.rser.2018.09.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Lauka D., Barisa A., Blumberga D. Assessment of the availability and utilization potential of low-quality biomass in Latvia. Energy Procedia 2018:147:518–524. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.06510.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.065
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] European Commission. First estimates of Research & Development expenditure “R&D expenditure in the EU increased slightly to 2.07% of GDP in 2017. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 63
Published on: Nov 18, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Europe-2020,
low/zero emission energy technology prioritization,
Matlab programming,
multi-criteria decision making (MCDM),
TOPSIS
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2019 Karina Suharevska, Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2019): Issue 2 (November 2019)Next article