Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mandatory Procurement Lessons. Phenomena of External Initiator Factor Cover

Mandatory Procurement Lessons. Phenomena of External Initiator Factor

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. [1] Geels F. W., Sovacool B. K., Schwanen T., Sorrell S. The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions. Joule 2017:1(3):463–479. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.01810.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018
  2. [2] Miezis M., Zvaigznitis K., Stancioff N., Soeftestad, L. Climate change and buildings energy efficiency–the key role of residents. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2016:17:30–43. doi:10.1515/rtuect-2016-000410.1515/rtuect-2016-0004
  3. [3] European Commission. 2020 climate & energy package. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2020_en
  4. [4] European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union 2009:L140:1–56.
  5. [5] European Commission. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union 2012:L315:16–62.
  6. [6] Ministry of Economics. Energetikas ricibas plans (Energy Action Plan), 2010. (In Latvian).
  7. [7] Barbosa L., Ferrao P., Rodrigues A., Sardinha A. Feed-in Tariffs with Minimum Price Guarantees and Regulatory Uncertainty. Energy Economics 2018:72:517–541. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.02810.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.028
  8. [8] Schallenberg-Rodriguez J. Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:76:1422–1439. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.10510.1016/j.rser.2017.03.105
  9. [9] Tabatabaei S. M., Hadian E., Marzban H., Zibaei M. Economic, welfare and environmental impact of feed-in tariff policy: A case study in Iran. Energy Policy 2017:102:164–169. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.02810.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.028
  10. [10] Dong Y., Shimada K. Evolution from the renewable portfolio standards to feed-in tariff for the deployment of renewable energy in Japan. Renewable Energy 2017:107:590–596. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.01610.1016/j.renene.2017.02.016
  11. [11] Atalay Y., Kalfagianni A., Pattberg P. Renewable energy support mechanisms in the Gulf Cooperation Council states: Analyzing the feasibility of feed-in tariffs and auction mechanisms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:72:723–733. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.10310.1016/j.rser.2017.01.103
  12. [12] Ciarreta A., Espinosa M. P., Pizarro-Irizar C. Optimal regulation of renewable energy: A comparison of Feed-in Tariffs and Tradable Green Certificates in the Spanish electricity system. Energy Economics 2017:67:387–399. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.02810.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.028
  13. [13] Prasanna A., Mahmoodi J., Brosch T., Patel M. K. Recent experiences with tariffs for saving electricity in households. Energy Policy 2018:115:514–522. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.04410.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.044
  14. [14] Cabinet of Ministers. On the Energy Development Guidelines for 2016–2020. Latvijas Vestnesis 2016:32(5604).
  15. [15] Ministry of Economics. Informativais zinojums par energetikas politikas planosanas vadlinijam laika perioda lidz 2030. gadam. Energijas ilgtermina strategija 2030 – konkuretspejiga energetika sabiedribai, 2013. (Informative Report on Energy Policy Planning Guidance till 2030. Energy Long Term Strategy 2030 – Competitive Energy for Society.) (In Latvian).
  16. [16] AS “Rezeknes siltumtikli” energijas kopejas jaudas. (Total capacity of JSC “Rezeknes siltumtikli”.) Available: http://www.rezeknessiltumtikli.lv [Accessed: 05.09.18]
  17. [17] Klessmann C. Experience with renewable electricity (RES-E) support schemes in Europe. Current status and recent trends, 2014.
  18. [18] Kauliņš Dz. Aktuālie procesi enerģētikas politikā, 2017. (Current Processes in Energy Policy.) (In Latvian)
  19. [19] Cabinet of Ministers. Noteikumi par elektroenergijas razosanu un cenu noteiksanu, razojot elektroenergiju kogeneracija (Regulations Regarding Electricity Production and Price Determination upon Production of Electricity in Cogeneration). Latvijas Vestnesis 2009:42(4028). (in Latvian).
  20. [20] Cabinet of Ministers. Noteikumi par elektroenergijas razosanu, izmantojot atjaunojamos energoresursus, un cenu noteiksanas kartibu (Regulations Regarding the Production of Electricity Using Renewable Energy Sources and the Procedures for the Determination of the Price). Latvijas Vestnesis 2010:51/52(4243/4244). (In Latvian).
  21. [21] Ye L.-C., Rodrigues J. F. D., Lin H. X. Analysis of feed-in tariff policies for solar photovoltaic in China 2011–2016. Applied Energy 2017:203:496–505. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.03710.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.037
  22. [22] Koo B. Examining the impacts of Feed-in-Tariff and the Clean Development Mechanism on Korea’s renewable energy projects through comparative investment analysis. Energy Policy 2017:104:144–154. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.01710.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.017
  23. [23] Martin N., Rice J. Solar Feed-In Tariffs: Examining fair and reasonable retail rates using cost avoidance estimates. Energy Policy 2018:112:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.05010.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.050
  24. [24] Martin N., Rice J. Solar Feed-In Tariffs: Examining fair and reasonable retail rates using cost avoidance estimates. Energy Policy 2018:112:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.05010.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.050
  25. [25] Poruschi L., Ambrey C. L., Smart J. C. R. Revisiting feed-in tariffs in Australia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:82(1):260–270. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.02710.1016/j.rser.2017.09.027
  26. [26] Grover D., Daniels B. Social equity issues in the distribution of feed-in tariff policy benefits: A cross sectional analysis from England and Wales using spatial census and policy data. Energy Policy 2017:106:255–265. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.04310.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.043
  27. [27] Sandvall A. F., Ahlgren E. O., Ekvall T. Low-energy Buildings Heat Supply – Modelling of Energy Systems and Carbon Emissions Impacts. Energy Policy 2017:111:371–382. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.00710.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.007
  28. [28] Derveniece I. Izstrada siltuma tarifa samazinasanas projektu. (Development of a heat tariff reduction project.) Neatkariga Rita Avize 2012. (In Latvian).
  29. [29] Haka Z. Rezekne par gandriz 20 % samazina siltuma tarifus. (Rezekne reduces heat tariffs by almost 20 %.) Dienas Bizness 2013. (In Latvian).
  30. [30] Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulesanas komisija (Commisison of Public Utilities). Rezekne par siltumu bus jamaksa mazak; Regulators apstiprina jaunus siltumenergijas apgades pakalpojumu tarifus AS “Rezeknes Siltumtikli”. (Rezekne will be pay less for heat; The Regulator approves new tariffs for heat energy supply services at JSC “Rezeknes Siltumtikli”), 2018. (In Latvian).
  31. [31] Antweiler W. A two-part feed-in-tariff for intermittent electricity generation. Energy Economics 2017:65:458–470. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.01010.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.010
  32. [32] Blumberga A., Blumberga D., Dzene I., et al. Atjaunojamas elektroenergijas akumulacija. Riga, 2015.
  33. [33] Sandvall A. F., Ahlgren E. O., Ekvall T. System Profitability of Excess Heat Utilisation – A Case-based Modelling Analysis. Energy 2016:97:424–434. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.03710.1016/j.energy.2015.12.037
  34. [34] Sandvall A. F., Ahlgren E. O., Ekvall T. Cost-efficiency of Urban Heating Strategies – Modelling Scale Effects of Low-energy Building Heat Supply. Energy Strategy Reviews 2017:18:212–223. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2017.10.00310.1016/j.esr.2017.10.003
  35. [35] Sandvall A. F., Borjesson M., Ekvall T., Ahlgren E. O. Modeling of Environmental and Energy System Impacts of Large-Scale Excess Heat Utilization – a Regional Case Study. Energy 2015:79:68–79. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.04910.1016/j.energy.2014.10.049
  36. [36] Soder L., et al. A review of demand side flexibility potential in Northern Europe. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:91:654–664. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.10410.1016/j.rser.2018.03.104
  37. [37] Pablo-Romero M. D. P., Sanchez-Braza A., Salvador-Ponce J., Sanchez-Labrador N. An overview of feed-in tariffs, premiums and tenders to promote electricity from biogas in the EU-28. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:73:1366–1379. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.13210.1016/j.rser.2017.01.132
  38. [38] Bohringer C., Cuntz A., Harhoff D., Asane-Otoo E. The impact of the German feed-in tariff scheme on innovation: Evidence based on patent filings in renewable energy technologies. Energy Economics 2017:67:545–553. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.00110.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Language: English
Page range: 188 - 213
Published on: Aug 3, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Dagnija Blumberga, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.