Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cost Effective Method for Toxicity Screening of Pharmaceutical Wastewater Containing Inorganic Salts and Harmful Organic Compounds Cover

Cost Effective Method for Toxicity Screening of Pharmaceutical Wastewater Containing Inorganic Salts and Harmful Organic Compounds

Environmental and Climate Technologies
Volume 23 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
By: Elina Strade and  Daina Kalnina  
Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. [1] Neumegen R. A., Fernández-Alba A. R., Chisti Y. Toxicities of Trichlosan, Phenol, and Copper Sulfate in Activated Sludge. Environmental Toxicology 2005:20(2):160–164. doi:10.1002/tox.2009010.1002/tox.2009015793824
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Davies P. S., Murdoch F. The increasing importance of assessing toxicity in determining sludge health and management policy. Measurement and Control 2002:35(8):238–242. doi:10.1177/00202940020350080410.1177/002029400203500804
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Katritzky A. R., et al. Estimating the toxicities of organic chemicals in activated sludge process. Water Research 2010:44(8):2451–2460. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.00910.1016/j.watres.2010.01.00920153498
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Jurga A., Gemza N., Janiak K. A concept development of an early warning system for toxic sewage detection. E3S Web of Conferences 2017:17(00036):1–8. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/2017170003610.1051/e3sconf/20171700036
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Sanganyado E., Lu Z., Fu Q., Schlenk D., Gan J. Chiral pharmaceuticals: A review on their environmental occurrence and fate processes. Water Research 2017:124:527–542. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.00310.1016/j.watres.2017.08.00328806704
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Kraigher B., Kosjek T., Heath E., Kompare B., Mandic-Mulec I. Influence of pharmaceutical residues on the structure of activated sludge bacterial communities in wastewater treatment bioreactors. Water Research 2008:42(17):4578–4588. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.00610.1016/j.watres.2008.08.00618786690
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Vasiliadou I. A., Molina R., Martinez F., Melero J. A., Stathopoulou P. M., Tsiamis G. Toxicity assessment of pharmaceutical compounds on mixed culture from activated sludge using respirometric technique: The role of microbial community structure. Science of The Total Environment 2018:630:808–819. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.09510.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.09529494982
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Rozitis Dz., Strade E. COD reduction ability of microorganisms isolated from highly loaded pharmaceutical wastewater pre-treatment process. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 2015:6(2):507–512.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Tekin H., et al. Use of Fenton oxidation to improve the biodegradability of a pharmaceutical wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006:136(2):258–265. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.01210.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.01216423452
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Lefebvre O., et al. Biological treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater from the antibiotics industry. Water Science and Technology 2014:69(4):855–861. doi:10.2166/wst.2013.72910.2166/wst.2013.72924569287
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Ma K., Qin Z., Zhao Z., Zhao C., Liang S. Toxicity evaluation of wastewater collected at different treatment stages from a pharmaceutical industrial park wastewater treatment plant. Chemosphere 2016:158:163–170. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.05210.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.05227262686
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Shi X., Yeap T. S., Huang S., Chen J., Ng H. Y. Pretreatment of saline antibiotic wastewater using marine microalga. Bioresource Technology 2018:258:240–246. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.11010.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.110
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Ren S. Assessing wastewater toxicity to activated sludge: recent research and developments. Environment International 2004:30(8):1151–1164. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.06.00310.1016/j.envint.2004.06.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Sirtori C., et al. Decontamination industrial pharmaceutical wastewater by combining solar photo-Fenton and biological treatment. Water Research 2009:43(3):661–668. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.01310.1016/j.watres.2008.11.013
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Cēbere B., Faltiņa E., Zelčāns N., Kalniņa D. Toxicity tests for ensuring successful industrial wastewater treatment plant operation. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2009:3(3):41–47. doi:10.2478/v10145-009-0005-810.2478/v10145-009-0005-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Oller I., Malato S., Sánchez-Pérez J. A. Combination of Advanced Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination – A review. Science of Total Environment 2011:409(20):4141–4166. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.06110.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.061
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Philp J. C., et al. Whole cell immobilised biosensors for toxicity assessment of a wastewater treatment plant treating phenolics-containing waste. Analytica Chimica Acta 2003:487(1):61–74. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00358-110.1016/S0003-2670(03)00358-1
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Xiao Y., De Araujo C., Sze C. C., Stuckey D. C. Toxicity measurement in biological wastewater treatment processes: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2015:286:15–29. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.03310.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.033
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Hassan S. H. A., Van Ginkel S. W., Hussein M. A. M., Abskharon R., Oh S. E. Toxicity assessment using different bioassays and microbial biosensors. Environment International 2016:92–93:106–118. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.00310.1016/j.envint.2016.03.003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Kungolos A. Evaluation of toxic properties of industrial wastewater using on-line respirometry. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 2005:40(4):869–880. doi:10.1081/ESE-20004829210.1081/ESE-200048292
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Gutiérrez M., Etxebarria J., de las Fuentes L. Evaluation of wastewater toxicity: comparative study between Microtox® and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition. Water Research 2002:36(4):919–924. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00299-810.1016/S0043-1354(01)00299-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Meherdad F., et al. Identification of Bacterial Population of Activated Sludge Process and Their Potentials in Pharmaceutical Effluent Treatment. British Biotechnology Journal 2014:4(3):317–324. doi:10.9734/BBJ/2014/791310.9734/BBJ/2014/7913
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Surerus V., Giordano G., Teixeira L. A. C. Activated sludge inhibition capacity index. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2014:31(2):385–392. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20140312s0000251610.1590/0104-6632.20140312s00002516
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Abdalla K. Z., Hammam G. Correlation between Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Chemical Oxygen Demand for Various Wastewater Treatment Plants in Egypt to Obtain the Biodegradability Indices. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 2014:13(1):42–48.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Mangkoedihardjo S. Biodegradability Improvement of Industrial Wastewater Using Hyacinth. Journal of Applied Sciences 2006:6:1409–1414. doi:10.3923/jas.2006.1409.141410.3923/jas.2006.1409.1414
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Cui W., Cui Z., Zhang N., Ma Q., Liu L., Zhang X. A new efficient technology for refractory phenol-formaldehyde resin wastewater treatment. RSC Advances 2016:6(23):19078–19088. doi:10.1039/C5RA21502A10.1039/521502
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR). Toxicological profile for Formaldehyde. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1999.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Eiroa M., Vilar A., Amor L., Kennes C., Veiga M. C. Biodegradation and effect of formaldehyde and phenol on the denitrification process. Water Research 2005:39(2–3):449–455. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.01710.1016/j.watres.2004.09.017
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR). Toxicological profile for Phenol. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Yoong E. T., Lant P. A., Greenfield P. F. In situ respirometry in an SBR treating wastewater with high phenol concentrations. Water Research 2000:34(1):239–245. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00142-610.1016/S0043-1354(99)00142-6
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Hussain A., Dubey S. K., Kumar V. Kinetic study for aerobic treatment of phenolic wastewater. Water Resources and Industry 2015:11:81–90. doi:10.1016/j.wri.2015.05.00210.1016/j.wri.2015.05.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Pradeep N. V., et al. Biological removal of phenol from wastewaters: a mini review. Applied Water Science 2015:5(2):105–112. doi:10.1007/s13201-014-0176-810.1007/s13201-014-0176-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Heys K. A., Shore R. F., Pereira M. G., Jones K. C., Martin F. L. Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects. RSC Advances 2016:6(53):47844–47857. doi:10.1039/C6RA05406D10.1039/605406
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Kargi F. Enhanced biological treatment of saline wastewater by using halophilic bacteria. Biotechnology Letters 2002:24(19):1569–1572. doi:10.1023/A:102037942191710.1023/A:1020379421917
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Lefebvre O., Moletta R. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: A literature review. Water Research 2006:40(20):3671–3682. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.02710.1016/j.watres.2006.08.027
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Shi X., Lefebvre O., Ng K. K., Ng H.Y. Sequential anaerobic-aerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater with high salinity. Bioresource Technology 2014:153:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.04510.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.045
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Zhang X., Gao J., Zhao F., Zhao Y., Li Z. Characterization of a salt-tolerant bacterium Bacillus sp. from a membrane bioreactor for saline wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2014:26(6):1369–1374. doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60613-010.1016/S1001-0742(13)60613-0
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Wang R., et al. Effects of inorganic salts on denitrifying granular sludge: The acute toxicity and working mechanisms. Bioresource Technology 2016:204:65–70. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.06210.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.06226773376
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Ochoa-Herrera V., et al. Toxicity of fluoride to microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems. Water Research 2009:43(13):3177–3186. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.03210.1016/j.watres.2009.04.03219457531
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Negrea A., et al. Studies Concerning the Aluminium Ions Removal from Waste Water. Chemical Bulletin of "POLITEHNICA" University of Timişoara 2005:50:148–51.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Pour P. G., Takassi M. A., Hamoule T. Removal of Aluminum from Water and Industrial Waste Water. Oriental Journal of Chemistry 2014:30(3):1365–1369. doi:10.13005/ojc/30035610.13005/ojc/300356
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Olaniran A. O., Balgobind A., Pillay B. Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Soil: Impact on Microbial Biodegradation of Organic Compounds and Possible Improvement Strategies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2013:14(5):10197–10228. doi:10.3390/ijms14051019710.3390/ijms140510197367683623676353
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Jaishankar M., Tseten T., Anbalagan N., Mathew B. B., Beeregowda K. N. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology 2014:7(2):60–72. doi:10.2478/intox-2014-000910.2478/intox-2014-0009442771726109881
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Rosseland B. O., Eldhuset T. D., Staurnes M. Environmental effects of aluminium. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 1990:12(1–2):17–27. doi:10.1007/BF0173404510.1007/BF0173404524202562
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Sparling D. W. Ecotoxicology Essentials: Environmental Contaminants and Their Biological Effects on Animals and Plants. London: Academic Press, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Comber S. D. W., Gardner M. J., Churchley J. Aluminium speciation: implications of wastewater effluent dosing on river water quality. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability 2005:17(3):117–128. doi:10.3184/09542290578277487410.3184/095422905782774874
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Klimek B., et al. The toxicity of aluminium salts to Lecane inermis rotifers: are chemical and biological methods used to overcome activated sludge bulking mutually exclusive? Archives of Environmental Protection 2013:39(3):127–138. doi:10.2478/aep-2013-002410.2478/aep-2013-0024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8837 | Journal ISSN: 1691-5208
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 63
Published on: Jul 15, 2019
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Activated sludge,
biochemical oxygen demand,
pharmaceutical wastewater,
toxicity Nomenclature
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2019 Elina Strade, Daina Kalnina, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)Next article